Literature DB >> 30006843

Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era.

Christopher W Mangieri1,2, Bryan P Hendren3, Matthew A Strode3,4, Bradley C Bandera3, Byron J Faler3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed laparoscopic procedure. It is superior in nearly every regard compared to open cholecystectomies. The one significant aspect where the laparoscopic approach is inferior regards the association with bile duct injuries (BDI). The BDI rate with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is approximately 0.5%; nearly triple the rate compared to the open approach. We propose that 0.5% BDI rate with the laparoscopic approach is no longer accurate.
METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry was retrospectively reviewed. All laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed between 2012 and 2016 were extracted. A total of 217,774 cases meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The primary data points were the overall BDI incidence rate and time of diagnosis. BDI were identified by ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Secondary data points were variables associated with BDI.
RESULTS: The BDI rate was 0.19%. 77% of cases were diagnosed after the index surgical admission. Intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) use was associated with a higher BDI rate and higher identification rate of a BDI intraoperatively (P value < 0.0001). Resident teaching cases were protective with a RR score of 0.56 (P value < 0.0001). The presence of cholecystitis increased the risk of a BDI with a RR score of 1.20 (P value < 0.0001). There was a low conversion rate of 0.04% however converted cases had a nearly hundredfold increase in BDI at 15% (P value < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in North America is no longer associated with higher BDI rates compared to open. IOC use still is not protective against BDI, and cholecystitis continues to be a risk factor for BDI. When a cholecystectomy requires conversion from a laparoscopic to an open approach the BDI increases a hundredfold; which may raise the concern if this approach is still a safe bailout method for a difficult laparoscopic dissection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BDI; Bile duct injury; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Procedural safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30006843     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6333-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  36 in total

1.  The decline of training in open biliary surgery: effect on the residents' attitude toward bile duct surgery.

Authors:  R S Chung; L Wojtasik; Q Pham; V Chari; P Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: incidents and complications. A retrospective analysis of 9542 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  S Duca; O Bãlã; N Al-Hajjar; C Lancu; I C Puia; D Munteanu; F Graur
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review.

Authors:  Wan Yee Lau; Eric C H Lai; Stephanie H Y Lau
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club.

Authors:  M J Moore; C L Bennett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Cagir; M Rangraj; L Maffuci; B L Herz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1994-12

6.  Bile duct injuries at laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single-institution prospective study. Acute cholecystitis indicates an increased risk.

Authors:  Claes Söderlund; Farshad Frozanpor; Stefan Linder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Beyond the learning curve: incidence of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy normalize to open in the modern era.

Authors:  Caitlin Halbert; Spyridon Pagkratis; Jie Yang; Ziqi Meng; Maria S Altieri; Purvi Parikh; Aurora Pryor; Mark Talamini; Dana A Telem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: primary and long-term results from a single institution.

Authors:  Jukka Karvonen; Risto Gullichsen; Simo Laine; Paulina Salminen; Juha M Grönroos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Bile duct injuries, 1989-1993. A statewide experience. Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  J C Russell; S J Walsh; A S Mattie; J T Lynch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1996-04

10.  What necessitates the conversion to open cholecystectomy? A retrospective analysis of 5164 consecutive laparoscopic operations.

Authors:  Volkan Genc; Marlen Sulaimanov; Gokhan Cipe; Salim Ilksen Basceken; Nezih Erverdi; Mehmet Gurel; Nusret Aras; Selcuk M Hazinedaroglu
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.

Authors:  Anne Marthe Schreuder; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink; Povilas Ignatavicius; Antanas Gulbinas; Giedrius Barauskas; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Association of Video Completed by Audio in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Improvements in Operative Reporting.

Authors:  Özgür Eryigit; Floyd W van de Graaf; Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs; Meindert N Sosef; Eelco J R de Graaf; Anand G Menon; Marilyne M Lange; Johan F Lange
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: An Indian e-survey.

Authors:  Supriya Sharma; Anu Behari; Ratnakar Shukla; Mukteshwar Dasari; Vinay K Kapoor
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  The evaluation of B-SAFE and ultrasonographic landmarks in safe orientation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Maciej Sebastian; Agata Sebastian; Jerzy Rudnicki
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Effect of timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on postoperative efficacy and rehabilitation of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Runze Xu; Yefang Xu; Ran Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Isolated aberrant right cysticohepatic duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evaluation and treatment challenges of a severe postoperative complication associated with an extremely rare anatomical variant.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vasiliadis; Elena Moschou; Sofia Papaioannou; Panagiotis Tzitzis; Albion Totsi; Stamatia Dimou; Eleni Lazaridou; Dimitrios Kapetanos; Christos Papavasiliou
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-05-31

7.  Two Cases of Subvesical Bile Duct Injury Detected and Repaired Simultaneously during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Atsushi Kohga; Kenji Suzuki; Takuya Okumura; Kiyoshige Yajima; Kimihiro Yamashita; Jun Isogaki; Akihiro Kawabe
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 8.  Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Adoption of universal culture of safety in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Vishal Gupta; Gaurav Jain
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-27

9.  Recommendation for Photographic Documentation of Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Maciej Sebastian; Agata Sebastian; Jerzy Rudnicki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Excision of a part of the bile duct as an iatrogenic injury typical for laparoscopic cholecystectomy - characteristics, treatment and long-term results, based on own material.

Authors:  Sergiusz Durowicz; Ireneusz Kozicki; Adam Ciesielski; Wiesław Tarnowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.