Literature DB >> 30006474

Randomized Controlled Trial of E-Counseling for Hypertension: REACH.

Robert P Nolan1,2, Ross Feldman3, Martin Dawes4, Janusz Kaczorowski5, Hazel Lynn6, Susan I Barr4, Carolyn MacPhail7, Scott Thomas2, Jack Goodman2, Gunther Eysenbach8,2, Sam Liu9, Rika Tanaka10, Jelena Surikova10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of internet-based interventions to improve hypertension management is not established. We evaluated the therapeutic benefit of e-counseling by adapting best evidence guidelines for behavioral counseling. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial included assessments at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Participants were 35 to 74 years of age and diagnosed with hypertension: systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) 130 to 180/85 to 110 mm Hg. BP was assessed by automated office measurement. E-Counseling used multimedia and interactive tools to increase motivation and skill for self-care (exercise, diet, medication adherence, and smoking cessation). Control used self-care education. Frequency of contact by our e-platform was equal for both trial arms. Primary end points were change at 4 and 12 months in systolic BP, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, total lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and Framingham 10-year cardiovascular risk index. Intention-to-treat analysis used generalized linear models adjusted for baseline measures, sex, and medications. Among 264 participants, mean age was 57.6 years (SE, 0.6), 58% were women, with 83% on antihypertensive medications. At 12 months, e-counseling versus control evoked greater reduction in systolic BP (-10.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI), -12.5, -7.6] versus -6.0 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.5, -3.5]; P=0.02); pulse pressure (-5.2 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.9, -3.5] versus -2.7 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.5, -0.9]; P=0.04), and Framingham risk index (-1.9% [95% CI, -3.3, -0.5] versus -0.02% [95% CI, -1.2, 1.7]; P=0.02), respectively. Among males in e-counseling versus control, 12-month end points included lower diastolic BP (P=0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.04), total lipoprotein cholesterol (P=0.03), and a trend for total lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (P=0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first double-blind randomized trial of e-counseling for hypertension. Added benefit for medical therapy was achieved by combining available technology with a clinically organized protocol of motivational and cognitive-behavioral counseling. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01541540.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; clinical trial; health behavior; internet; lifestyle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30006474     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes        ISSN: 1941-7713


  13 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the dose-response relationship between usage and outcomes of online physical activity weight-loss interventions.

Authors:  Nicholas Smith; Sam Liu
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 2.  Health Behavior Change Programs in Primary Care and Community Practices for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Risk Factor Management Among Midlife and Older Adults: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Deepika Laddu; Jun Ma; Jill Kaar; Cemal Ozemek; Raegan W Durant; Tavis Campbell; Jean Welsh; Stephanie Turrise
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 39.918

3.  Utilising digital health to improve medication-related quality of care for hypertensive patients: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Kannikar Wechkunanukul; Daya Ram Parajuli; Mohammad Hamiduzzaman
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Internet-based patient- primary care physician-cardiologist integrated management model of hypertension in China: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Runyu Ye; Rufeng Shi; Kai Liu; Xin Zhang; Si Wang; Hang Liao; Xinran Li; Qiling Gou; Xi Rong; Zhipeng Zhang; Changqiang Yang; Xiangyu Yang; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Effect of electronic health interventions on metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dandan Chen; Zhihong Ye; Jing Shao; Leiwen Tang; Hui Zhang; Xiyi Wang; Ruolin Qiu; Qi Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Web-Based Dietary and Physical Activity Intervention Programs for Patients With Hypertension: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Fatimah Najihah Baderol Allam; Mohd Ramadan Ab Hamid; Siti Sabariah Buhari; Harrinni Md Noor
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Psychobehavioral Profiles to Assist Tailoring of Interventions for Patients With Hypertension: Latent Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Rika Tanaka; Robert P Nolan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Achieving Rapid Blood Pressure Control With Digital Therapeutics: Retrospective Cohort and Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Nicole L Guthrie; Mark A Berman; Katherine L Edwards; Kevin J Appelbaum; Sourav Dey; Jason Carpenter; David M Eisenberg; David L Katz
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2019-03-12

9.  The Effectiveness of Self-Management of Hypertension in Adults Using Mobile Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ran Li; Ning Liang; Fanlong Bu; Therese Hesketh
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Hypertension management in 2030: a kaleidoscopic view.

Authors:  Spoorthy Kulkarni
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.