Elena Hotinski1, James Dudley2. 1. Postgraduate Prosthodontics Registrar, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. Electronic address: elena.hotinski@gmail.com. 2. Associate Professor and Program Director, Postgraduate Prosthodontics, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Techniques that allow angulation correction for screw-retained implant-supported restorations are now available. However, whether angulation correction built into the head of the implant affects abutment screw loosening is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants and straight implants subjected to simulated nonaxial occlusal loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven external connection 12-degree angulation-correcting implants and 7 straight implants were embedded in an acrylic resin housing, and titanium abutments were secured with titanium screws tightened to 32 Ncm. Each specimen was secured in a tooth wear machine and subjected to 1 000 000 cycles of 50-N nonaxial load to simulate 1 year of clinical service. The mean abutment screw removal torque values were calculated, and the association between number of cycles and the abutment screw removal torque was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model and statistical software (α=.05) RESULTS: The mean abutment screw torque loss was 59.8% for the angulation-correcting implant group and 68.7% for the straight implant group. A statistically significantly greater mean abutment screw removal torque was recorded in the angulation-correcting implant group compared with the straight implant group after 1 000 000 cycles (P=.019). CONCLUSIONS: A significant loss of abutment screw torque was found in both implant groups with increased cycles of occlusal loading. The angulation-correcting implants resisted screw loosening significantly more than the straight implants because of the reduced angle of abutment screw loading.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Techniques that allow angulation correction for screw-retained implant-supported restorations are now available. However, whether angulation correction built into the head of the implant affects abutment screw loosening is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess abutment screw loosening in angulation-correcting implants and straight implants subjected to simulated nonaxial occlusal loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven external connection 12-degree angulation-correcting implants and 7 straight implants were embedded in an acrylic resin housing, and titanium abutments were secured with titanium screws tightened to 32 Ncm. Each specimen was secured in a tooth wear machine and subjected to 1 000 000 cycles of 50-N nonaxial load to simulate 1 year of clinical service. The mean abutment screw removal torque values were calculated, and the association between number of cycles and the abutment screw removal torque was analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model and statistical software (α=.05) RESULTS: The mean abutment screw torque loss was 59.8% for the angulation-correcting implant group and 68.7% for the straight implant group. A statistically significantly greater mean abutment screw removal torque was recorded in the angulation-correcting implant group compared with the straight implant group after 1 000 000 cycles (P=.019). CONCLUSIONS: A significant loss of abutment screw torque was found in both implant groups with increased cycles of occlusal loading. The angulation-correcting implants resisted screw loosening significantly more than the straight implants because of the reduced angle of abutment screw loading.