Jordi Cabanas-Danés1,2, Ellie Landman3, Jurriaan Huskens2, Marcel Karperien3, Pascal Jonkheijm1,2. 1. Bioinspired Molecular Engineering Laboratory, TechMed Centre , University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede , The Netherlands. 2. Molecular Nanofabrication Group, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology , University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede , The Netherlands. 3. Developmental BioEngineering Group, TechMed Centre , University of Twente , P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede , The Netherlands.
Abstract
Release of growth factors while simultaneously maintaining their full biological activity over a period of days to weeks is an important issue in controlled drug delivery and in tissue engineering. In addition, the selected strategy to immobilize growth factors largely determines their biological activity. Silica surfaces derivatized with glycidyloxy propyl trimethoxysilane and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) brushes yielded epoxide-functionalized surfaces onto which human bone morphogenetic protein-6 (hBMP-6) was immobilized giving stable secondary amine bonds. The biological activity of hBMP-6 was unleashed by hydrolysis of the surface siloxane and ester bonds. We demonstrate that this type of labile bonding strategy can be applied to biomaterial surfaces with relatively simple and biocompatible chemistry, such as siloxane, ester, and imine bonds. Our data indicates that the use of differential hydrolytically labile linkers is a versatile method for functionalization of biomaterials with a variety of growth factors providing control over their biological activity.
Release of growth factors while nclass="Chemical">simultaneously maintaining their full biological activity over a period of days to weeks is an important issue in controlled drug delivery and in tissue engineering. In addition, the selected strategy to immobilize growth factors largely determines their biological activity. class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Silica surfaces derivatized with glycidyloxy propyl trimethoxysilane and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) brushes yielded epoxide-functionalized surfaces onto which humanbone morphogenetic protein-6 (hBMP-6) was immobilized giving stable secondary amine bonds. The biological activity of hBMP-6 was unleashed by hydrolysis of the surface siloxane and ester bonds. We demonstrate that this type of labile bonding strategy can be applied to biomaterial surfaces with relatively simple and biocompatible chemistry, such as siloxane, ester, and imine bonds. Our data indicates that the use of differential hydrolytically labile linkers is a versatile method for functionalization of biomaterials with a variety of growth factors providing control over their biological activity.
Growth factors (GFs)
are endogenously present either bound to the
extracellular matrix (ECM)[1] or as soluble
molecules secreted by cells. Bound GFs, as opposed to their soluble
analogues, provide control over their local concentration and protection
from enzymatic degradation.[2] Many growth
factors are bound in an inactive conformation to the ECM. Upon proteolyticcleavage, these growth factors become active and are released in the
extracellular space. An example of such a GF is the Bone Morphogenetic
Protein-6 (nclass="Gene">hBMP-6) growth factor, which is a member of the transforming
growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily. class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">hBMP-6 is stored
in the ECM as an inactive precursor molecule. Upon proteolytic cleavage,
active, mature hBMP-6 is released from the degrading ECM which in
turn stimulates cells to repair the lost tissue.[3] BMP-6 is known to regulate differentiation of various cells
implicated in cartilage and bone formation during skeletal development
and fracture repair.[4−6] This is exemplified by the hBMP-6 mediated induction
of alkaline phosphatase activity in osteoblast precursor cells, a
hallmark of osteogenic differentiation.[7]
Throughout the past decade, many efforts have been devoted
to develop
methods to immobilize GFs at biomaterial surfaces.[8−10] The main aim
of these efforts is to mimic the endogenous GF delivery system and
thereby improving the performance of biomaterials in tissue engineering
and therapeutic applications.[8−10] For example, nclass="Gene">hBMP-2 has been
mixed with biomaterials to be released by diffuclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sion and thereby activating
cell differentiation.[11,12] Other approaches have been focusing
on linking ECM elements, such as heparins,[13−15] or mimics thereof,[16−20] to biomaterials in order to position growth factors on their surfaces
through heparin’s growth factor binding domains. Single-domain
antibodies have also been employed to reversibly link growth factors
to surfaces,[21] or alternatively, direct
coupling of growth factors has also been pursued using noncovalent
His-tag technology.[22] Covalent chemistry
yields long-term presentation of growth factors,[23,24] which continuously engage in receptor binding and protein dimerization,
and hamper internalization of growth factors.[25]
Here, we investigate the effect on cells when hydrolytically
labile
nclass="Chemical">siloxane and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">imine bonds are used as a linkage between the surface
and the GF. Such chemistry has been successfully applied for the controlled
formation of for example reversible gels, polymers and functional
surfaces.[26−28] Siloxane and imine bonds are attractive as they can
be hydrolyzed under physiological conditions.[29−34] Klok and co-workers have studied the stability of trialkoxysilane-anchored
brushes and found that brushes detached from the surface upon prolonged
exposure to cell culture medium.[33b] Using
reversible imine bonds, biologically active molecules were cross-linked
in a hydrophilic polymer network.[29] Differences
in the percentage of released small molecules as well as the duration
of that release were strictly depended on the percentage of the entrapped
compound in the solvent of the gel.[29] In
addition, reversible imine bonds were used to fabricate various mixed
surface patterns and gradients to control surface compositions of
small molecules and their subsequent release.[31,32] Despite the potential of adopting reversible chemistry for constructing
and functionalizing materials and surfaces, to date these types of
reversible siloxane and imine bonds have not been explored for the
delivery of GFs. We study the effect on cell response of releasing
hBMP-6 through hydrolytical cleavage. Release can be slowed down by
creating a polymer brush. The data suggests the released growth factors
are bioactive.
Results and Disucssion
The Immobilization of hBMP-6
onto Epoxide-Coated Surfaces and
Its Cell Signaling Capability
Monolayers of hBMP-6
To establish
the method of hydrolytically
releanclass="Chemical">sing class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">hBMP-6, we started with model studies on freshly prepared
epoxide-terminated glass slides. Deposition of (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane
(GPTMS, Figure a)
successfully yielded monolayers, evident from the recorded advancing
contact angle value of 55° ± 2° and the increase in
film thickness of 0.9 nm ± 0.2 nm using ellipsometry, which is
in agreement with literature (Table ).[33,34] hBMP-6 was covalently immobilized
to epoxide-functionalized substrates by reactive microcontact printing
(μCP)[35] (Figure a) through a nucleophilic ring-opening reaction,
presumably with primary amine groups of the lysine residues that are
localized at the periphery of the dimeric GF structure. Immobilization
of hBMP-6 led to an increase of the advancing contact angle value
from 55° ± 2° to 64° ± 5°, to the appearance
of an N1s peak in the XPS spectrum indicating the presence of ca.
1% N and to a further increase in film thickness of 1 nm as observed
by ellipsometry (Table ). Inspection of the monolayers using atomic force microscopy (AFM)
(Figure b, c) revealed
clear patterns of effectively immobilized hBMP-6 with on average nearly
70% of the total area of the pattern occupied with protein. A height
of 0.5 nm between the protein patterns and the background was observed
(Figure S1), which is lower than observed
using ellipsometry presumably due to tip-induced compression of the
proteins. These results indicate that hBMP-6 is immobilized in a moderately
packed, single layer configuration, which amounts to ca. 120 ng/cm2.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic overview of the preparation of epoxide-terminated
glass substrates with two linkers of different length that have a
difference in hydrolytic release: (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane
(GPTMS) (top) and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) (bottom) and
subsequent immobilization of hBMP-6 (accessible lysine residues are
indicated in dark gray) by reactive microcontact printing (μCP)
(atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)). (b) Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) phase image of hBMP-6 micropatterned (10 μm diameter dots
and 5 μm spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface without using
a passivated background. (c) Zoom in of the phase image. (d) Fluorescence
microscopy image (inset shows the intensity profile) of immunostained
μCP patterns of hBMP-6 (100 μm diameter dots and 100 μm
spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface using a background passivated
by NH2-PEG (see the Supporting Information for details).
Table 1
Advancing
(θa) and
Receding (θb) Water Contact Angle Values, Ellipsometric
Thicknesses, and N Fractions Determined by XPS of
the Two Epoxide-Terminated Linkers before and after the Immobilization
of hBMP-6
monolayer (full)
θa [deg]
θb [deg]
ellipsometric thickness [nm]
N [%] (XPS)
GPTMS
55 ± 2
40 ± 5
0.9 ± 0.2
–a
GPTMS + hBMP-6
64 ± 5
47 ± 2
1.9 ± 0.2
1.0 ± 0.3
PGMA
60 ± 1
52 ± 4
80 ± 3
–a
PGMA + hBMP-6
65 ± 1
41 ± 4
87 ± 2
0.7 ± 0.2
Not detected.
(a) Schematic overview of the preparation of nclass="Chemical">epoxide-terminated
glass substrates with two linkers of different length that have a
difference in hydrolytic release: class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">(3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane
(GPTMS) (top) and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) (bottom) and
subsequent immobilization of hBMP-6 (accessible lysine residues are
indicated in dark gray) by reactive microcontact printing (μCP)
(atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)). (b) Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) phase image of hBMP-6 micropatterned (10 μm diameter dots
and 5 μm spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface without using
a passivated background. (c) Zoom in of the phase image. (d) Fluorescence
microscopy image (inset shows the intensity profile) of immunostained
μCP patterns of hBMP-6 (100 μm diameter dots and 100 μm
spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface using a background passivated
by NH2-PEG (see the Supporting Information for details).
Not detected.
Induction of Osteogenic
Differentiation
Immobilized
nclass="Gene">hBMP-6 was also visualized uclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sing immunofluorescence staining of the
surface. The recorded fluorescence micrograph (Figure d) showed clearly the presence of hBMP-6
at the surface. This result indicates that the immobilized hBMP-6
had conceivably retained the GF secondary structure, which is essential
for antibody binding. The covalent immobilization appeared to be specific
to the epoxide SAM because in controls with preblocking the epoxide
groups with BSA or incubation on a glass surface, the immunofluorescence
staining was absent. To determine whether immobilized hBMP-6 remained
biologically active on the surface, a mesenchymal precursor cell line
(KS483) was seeded for 24 h on the surfaces. Cells adhered on glass
in the absence of hBMP-6, while addition of hBMP-6 or immobilized
hBMP-6 on GPTMS layers did not lead to significant changes in cell
spreading kinetics, as expected (Figure S2). Actin cytoskeleton stains showed no significant differences in
cell area and stress fiber formation (Figure S2). Confluency was reached after 4 days, and no cytotoxicity of the
surfaces was observed (Figure S2). KS483
cells can differentiate into osteoblasts during a 1–3 week
culture period under osteogenesis-inducing conditions and this can
be shown by the induction of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as early marker
of osteogenic differentiation. Mature human and mouseBMP-6 share
96% amino acid identity, and human BMPs cross react with mouse BMP
receptors. This cell model is therefore suitable to assess the ability
of hBMP-6 to initiate differentiation into mineralizing osteoblasts.[21,36] KS483 cells were seeded on immobilized hBMP-6 coated surfaces and
both an immunofluorescence hBMP-6 stain and an immunohistochemical
ALP stain were clearly visible in contrast to control surfaces with
immobilized polyethyleneglycol (Figure a, b). These results indicate that only in the areas
where functional hBMP-6 was available, ALP production was induced.
The biological activity of immobilized hBMP-6 and supplemented hBMP-6
was compared by normalizing the ALP activity in KS483 cells after
seven days of culture to the DNA content of the total number of cells
in contact with the substrate and expressed as relative induction
values compared to a glass control (Figure c). Interestingly, cells seeded on immobilized
hBMP-6 produced significantly more ALP when compared to all other
cases (Figure c).
Increase in induced ALP activity on immobilized hBMP-6 was 4-fold
in comparison with controls on glass. This contrasts significantly
with the 2-fold increase in induced ALP activity when the culture
medium was supplemented with comparable amounts of hBMP-6. Controls
where hBMP-6 was partly denatured (by heating at 90 °C for 2
min) prior to cell seeding showed a significant loss of ALP. Controls
where cells were seeded on epoxide-terminated glass, in medium supplemented
with hBMP-6, showed a significantly lower ALP activity when compared
to immobilized hBMP-6. Yet, the ALP induction was significantly higher
when compared to epoxide-terminated glass controls without supplemented
hBMP-6 and glass controls with supplemented hBMP-6. Also, epoxide-terminated
surfaces induced ALP activity by 2-fold versus glass controls indicating
an osteo-inductive effect of the epoxide groups. Dose-dependent ALP
activities were performed for immobilized and supplemented hBMP-6
(Figure d). When supplemented
hBMP-6 was doubled to 200 ng/mL, a significant rise in ALP activity
was noted, but the ALP activity plateaued when hBMP-6 was doubled
again. A concentration of 200–400 ng/mL hBMP-6 is in excess.[37] Interestingly, the ALP activity of cells seeded
on immobilized hBMP-6 compared favorably to the case when 200 ng/mL
or higher of supplemented hBMP-6 was used. This indicates that a sufficient
amount of active hBMP-6 is available on the surface (ca. 120 ng/cm2) to achieve the maximum ALP activity. The immobilized hBMP-6
dose was easily reduced by a fourth (ca. 28 ng/cm2) using
a featured μCP stamp during the immobilization step. This reduced
dose resulted in a significantly lower ALP activity when compared
to an entirely covered surface, but still significantly higher when
compared to 100 ng/mL of hBMP-6 that was supplied to the medium. Taken
together, these results indicate that immobilized hBMP-6 is bioactive
and effective to induce ALP activity in cells.
Figure 2
Study of early osteogenesis
in KS483 cells by immobilized hBMP-6.
(a) Fluorescence microscopy image of hBMP-6 immobilized (by immersion
2 h in this case) on half of the substrate after immunofluorescence
staining (inset shows averaged intensity profiles). (b) Immunohistochemical
staining of ALP, after 4 days by KS483 cells (inset shows intensity
profile with high (white) intensity indicative of low ALP activity).
This slide was also prepared by immobilization of hBMP-6 by immersion
(2 h). (c) ALP activity normalized by the total DNA content of KS483
cells after 6 days of culture, expressed as relative induction to
a glass control in the presence of soluble (s (100 ng/mL)), bound
(b), denatured bound (db) hBMP-6. Immobilization of hBMP-6 using flat
stamps. (d) Dose response of KS483 cells cultured for 7 days in the
presence of increasing concentrations of hBMP-6 in solution and two
different amounts of bound hBMP-6, i.e., a full layer (100%, ca. 120
ng/cm2) of hBMP-6 and a μCP patterned layer of hBMP-6
(23% of the coverage in comparison to the full layer (using a flat
stamp, ca. 28 ng/cm2). *p < 0.05 and
**p < 0.01.
Study of early osteogenenclass="Chemical">sis
in KS483 cells by immobilized class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">hBMP-6.
(a) Fluorescence microscopy image of hBMP-6 immobilized (by immersion
2 h in this case) on half of the substrate after immunofluorescence
staining (inset shows averaged intensity profiles). (b) Immunohistochemical
staining of ALP, after 4 days by KS483 cells (inset shows intensity
profile with high (white) intensity indicative of low ALP activity).
This slide was also prepared by immobilization of hBMP-6 by immersion
(2 h). (c) ALP activity normalized by the total DNA content of KS483
cells after 6 days of culture, expressed as relative induction to
a glass control in the presence of soluble (s (100 ng/mL)), bound
(b), denatured bound (db) hBMP-6. Immobilization of hBMP-6 using flat
stamps. (d) Dose response of KS483 cells cultured for 7 days in the
presence of increasing concentrations of hBMP-6 in solution and two
different amounts of bound hBMP-6, i.e., a full layer (100%, ca. 120
ng/cm2) of hBMP-6 and a μCP patterned layer of hBMP-6
(23% of the coverage in comparison to the full layer (using a flat
stamp, ca. 28 ng/cm2). *p < 0.05 and
**p < 0.01.
Shielded Release of hBMP-6
We next attached nclass="Gene">hBMP-6
to the surface by essentially class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">similar chemistry, but now using a longer
brush-type linker.[38] To this end, layers
of poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) brushes on glass were prepared
(Figure a).[38−42] Briefly, the atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) initiator,
2-bromo-2-methylpropionyl bromide, was reacted with the terminal amine
moieties of a (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) monolayer (Figure a). Subsequently,
the immobilized initiator was immersed in an oxygen-free solution
of glycidyl methacrylate as the ATRP monomer for 2 h to yield a PGMA
brush layer of 80 nm thickness (Table ). Immobilization of hBMP-6 onto the PGMA layers was
confirmed using contact angle, ellipsometry and XPS measurements (Table ). Immunofluorescence
stains of hBMP-6 on PGMA brushes were of similar intensity as compared
to the hBMP-6 patterns on GPTMS surfaces (Figures d and S3) suggesting
similar loading of hBMP-6 on either the GPTMS or PGMA coated surfaces.
The release of hBMP-6 in culture medium was quantified using an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) over a period of 15 days without cells
seeded (Figure top).
In the case of the short (GPTMS) linker, a released quantity of 100
ng/mL hBMP-6 was promptly reached within 24 h, which moderately increased
and plateaued in the following 7 days. The concentration of 100 ng/mL
of hBMP-6 is a therapeutic level reported in literature.[37,43] In the case of the long, PGMA linker, the release of hBMP-6 was
much slower (by a factor 6–10) in the first 4 days and the
therapeutic hBMP-6 level of 100 ng/mL was only reached at day 5, while
the total amount of released hBMP-6 after 7 and 15 days was half of
that on GPTMS. When the ELISA assay was performed when cells were
seeded on the hBMP-6 coated surfaces, remarkable differences were
observed. For cells seeded on layers of hBMP-6 on short (GPTMS) linkers,
a much reduced, near negligible, amount of released hBMP-6 protein
was observed during the first 5 to 6 days. When cells were seeded
on layers of hBMP-6 on long (PGMA) linkers, the detected release profile
was found close to the case without cells in the first 5 to 6 days.
We also observed a reduced cell adhesion and spreading on PGMA layers
in comparison with the GPTMS layers (Figure S2). A confluent cell layer was only reached after 7 days on the PGMA
layers, while on GPTMS layers, confluency was reached at day 4. After
7 days, lower quantities of hBMP-6 were also detected in the medium
on PGMA layers in the presence of cells. The observations indicate
that when cells adhere earlier, as on GPTMS, less hBMP-6 escaped to
the medium, and adhered cells with more bioactive hBMP-6 available,
facilitates more interactions with cellular BMP receptors at the cell
membrane. However, when cells adhere later, as on PGMA, slower released
hBMP could still escape into the medium. These results confirm that
release of hBMP-6 occurred and that the release kinetics could be
decreased on brushes of PGMA, but for released hBMP-6 to be confined
to cells, as required for registration by cells, cells need to be
adhered to the surface.
Figure 3
Quantification of hBMP-6 in medium by ELISA
(top) over a period
of 15 days without (solid lines) and with (dashed lines) 5000 cells/cm2 on GPTMS and PGMA with initially μCP hBMP-6 (patterned
stamps). Relative induction of ALP by KS483 cells after 4 days relative
to a glass control (bottom). Black bars represent relative induction
of cells seeded in contact with the films. White bars represent relative
induction of cells seeded in transwell. **p <
0.01.
Quantification of nclass="Gene">hBMP-6 in medium by ELISA
(top) over a period
of 15 days without (solid lines) and with (dashed lines) 5000 cells/cm2 on class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">GPTMS and PGMA with initially μCP hBMP-6 (patterned
stamps). Relative induction of ALP by KS483 cells after 4 days relative
to a glass control (bottom). Black bars represent relative induction
of cells seeded in contact with the films. White bars represent relative
induction of cells seeded in transwell. **p <
0.01.
In a next experiment, KS483 cells
were seeded for 4 days either
in direct contact to or separated from the surface unclass="Chemical">sing a transwell
assay (Figure bottom).
Low class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">ALP activity was observed on control surfaces (glass, GPTMS and
PGMA), irrespective of the presence of the transwell insert. Remarkably,
when cells were seeded in direct contact to or in transwell above
hBMP-6 immobilized on PGMA layers, in both of these cases, a lower
ALP activity was observed in comparison when cells were seeded in
direct contact to immobilized hBMP-6 on GPTMS layers, while an intermediate
ALP activity level was observed using GPTMS layers in the transwell
assay. These observations confirm that cells seeded on GPTMS layers
register more bioactive hBMP-6 after four days. This is presumably
aided by adhered cells that are able to confine and register released
hBMP-6 to produce ALP. This state of adhered cells and hence ability
to confine released hBMP-6 is different on PGMA layers, where both
release of hBMP-6 and cell adhesion is slower, but not to same extent
slower.
The biological activity of released nclass="Gene">hBMP-6 was further
confirmed
by measuring the luciferase activity of C2C12 cells that were stably
transfected with a BMP-responclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sive element (BRE) fused to the firefly
luciferase reporter gene (BRE-Luc cells) (Figure a).[44] C2C12 is
a model to study differentiation into bone cells.[44] To avoid effects related to material stiffness, differences
in luciferase expression relative to background of the same surface
in absence of hBMP-6 were used. Figure a shows that luciferase activity was delayed to day
two, when cells were seeded on surfaces with immobilized hBMP-6 using
the short (GPTMS) linker in comparison to soluble hBMP-6, whereas
on the long (PGMA) linker, a significant rise in luciferase activity
was observed only at day seven. In addition, mRNA expression levels
of osteoblast-specific runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2)
and osteocalcin (OCN) genes were analyzed using quantitative PCR (Figure b, c).[45] Upregulation of RUNX2 was clearly observed already
one day after cell seeding using either soluble hBMP-6 or hBMP-6 immobilized
using the short linker. OCN expression was first observed after day
three, which is in line with the delayed response of this gene during
osteoblast differentiation.[45,46] The increase in expression
of the same genes when cells were seeded on hBMP-6 coated surfaces
using the longer PGMA linker was clearly delayed. Taken together,
these results confirm that the activation of ALP production and the
induction of osteoblastic specific gene expression were activated
by hBMP-6. Attachment of hBMP-6 to a surface lessens its biological
activity as compared to the soluble growth factor controls. The activity
is unleashed by hydrolysis of the linker, which releases the hBMP-6
from the surface. These results are in agreement with the ELISA studies
showing that in the case of the long linker, the release of hBMP-6
is delayed with 4 to 5 days before cells adhere and have a minimal
dosage of released hBMP-6 present that can activate ALP production
and gene transcription. Therefore, we believe that the biological
activity of hBMP-6 growth factors anchored via siloxane-based linkers
is related to their release from the surface, but cells need to be
adhered to confine the released growth factors to the cells.
Figure 4
(a) Luminescence
of C2C12 cells transfected with BRE-Luc, measured
at different time points relative to a background using the same surface
without hBMP-6. Flat stamps were used for immobilization of hBMP-6.
Inset shows the luminescence results at day 7 from an independent
experiment. Gene expression analysis at days 1, 3, and 7 of (b) RUNX2
and (c) OCN was determined via the 2ΔΔCt method using
the expression on day 1 on glass as a reference. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
(a) Luminescence
of C2C12 cells transfected with BRE-Luc, measured
at different time points relative to a background unclass="Chemical">sing the same surface
without class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">hBMP-6. Flat stamps were used for immobilization of hBMP-6.
Inset shows the luminescence results at day 7 from an independent
experiment. Gene expression analysis at days 1, 3, and 7 of (b) RUNX2
and (c) OCN was determined via the 2ΔΔCt method using
the expression on day 1 on glass as a reference. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Growth Factor Activity of hBMP-6 on Biomaterials
To
demonstrate that our release strategy is applicable to nclass="Chemical">polymeric biomaterials,
we next attempted to functionalize a representative biomaterial with
growth factors adopting our findings in line with our model study
on glass. Therefore, a class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">siloxane-bound GPTMS linker was attached on
plasma-oxidized (Ox) 100 μm thick films of commercially available
biopolymers (Figure a and 5b) made of a poly(ether ester) copolymer
(PA) comprising poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(butylene terephthalate
(PBT) onto which hBMP-6 was immobilized (Figure c, II). In a second set of experiments, hBMP-6
was immobilized directly onto this polymer surface after introduction
of aldehyde groups by oxygen plasma treatment and the subsequent incubation
with hBMP-6 to introduce imine bond formation (Figure c, I). A control surface with irreversibly
bound GF was obtained by mildly reducing the imine bond (see the Supporting Information) to generate a stable,
irreversible, secondary amine linkage under physiological conditions
(Figure c, III). GPTMS-functionalization
of PA was verified with contact angle measurements, XPS and FT-IR
(Table S1, Figure S4). Upon oxidizing the
PA surface the advancing contact angle decreased with respect to the
native PA films, while upon coupling of GPTMS the contact angle increased.
Upon reaction with GPTMS, the presence of elemental Si was detected
in the XPS spectra, while deconvoluted XPS spectra of the C1s region
(Figure S4) showed an increase of the peak
at 286.35 eV, which can be attributed to ether bonds (C–O).[47] In addition, the peak centered at 288.52 eV,
which can be mainly attributed to ester bonds (O–C=O)
that are present in native PA films, was broadened during plasma treatment
indicating other carbonyl-containing species such as aldehyde/ketone
(C=O) groups, which typically have bands in the range of 287.1–288.1
eV. In the FT-IR spectrum an O-H stretching band appeared after plasma
treatment of the native PA films (inset Figure S5a). This band was significantly reduced upon reaction with
GPTMS indicating the conversion of O-H bonds into O-Si bonds. Also,
the ratio of the intensities of the asymmetric C–O–C
and the C=O stretching bands (Figure S5b) was inverted after the plasma treatment with a higher intensity
for the carbonyl peak. Upon reaction with GPTMS, the ratio was inverted
back with a slightly higher intensity for the C–O–C
stretching band corresponding to the epoxide ring of the linker. Taken
together, these results are indicative of successful activation of
the PA films with groups that allow the immobilization of hBMP-6 as
envisioned.
Figure 5
(a) Molecular structure of the block-copolymer (PA) consisting
of a hydrophilic block of poly(ethylene glycol terephthalate) (PEGT)
and a hydrophobic block of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). (b)
100 μm thick PA films were prepared by casting a solution of
3.4 wt% PA in chloroform overnight and cured above 60 °C for
several hours. (c) Schematic procedure of the surface functionalization
of PA films after preactivation using O2 plasma, with GPTMS.
hBMP-6 is subsequently immobilized via reactive μCP on the activated
film via the reaction between the primary amine groups (accessible
lysine residues in dark gray) and aldehyde groups forming an imine
bond (I), which is further reduced in order to increase its stability
toward hydrolysis (II) or on the GPTMS (III) with unreacted aldehyde
groups also available to tether the growth factor as in I.
(a) Molecular structure of the block-nclass="Chemical">copolymer (PA) conclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sisting
of a hydrophilic block of poly(ethylene glycol terephthalate) (PEGT)
and a hydrophobic block of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). (b)
100 μm thick PA films were prepared by casting a solution of
3.4 wt% PA in chloroform overnight and cured above 60 °C for
several hours. (c) Schematic procedure of the surface functionalization
of PA films after preactivation using O2 plasma, with GPTMS.
hBMP-6 is subsequently immobilized via reactive μCP on the activated
film via the reaction between the primary amine groups (accessible
lysine residues in dark gray) and aldehyde groups forming an imine
bond (I), which is further reduced in order to increase its stability
toward hydrolysis (II) or on the GPTMS (III) with unreacted aldehyde
groups also available to tether the growth factor as in I.
nclass="Gene">hBMP-6 microarrays on the activated PA films were
preclass="Chemical">pared via
reactive μCP as described in the model study on glass and visualized
by immunostaining (Figure S6). The results
showed that class="Chemical">pan class="Gene">hBMP-6 was successfully anchored via the different immobilization
strategies. For the GPTMS linker, a significant decay of fluorescence
intensity was observed within two days, which is slower in comparison
to the case of applying this linker on glass substrates, but faster
than for immobilizing hBMP-6 via imines, while, after reduction using
NaBH3CN, the fluorescence intensity remained nearly constant
over the course of seven days. This indicated that hBMP-6 remained
linked to the surface in this time period. Significant enhancement
of cell adhesion was observed after the formation of a GPTMS linker
on the PA films, irrespective of the presence of hBMP-6 (Figure S7d, h). Plasma treated PA films (PAOx)
exhibited improved cell adhesion and spreading in comparison to native
PA films (Figure S7a, b), which is in agreement
with literature,[48] while immobilization
of hBMP-6 did not change cell adhesion as expected (Figure S7e, f). Similar cell adhesion behavior was found on
these films after reduction of the imine bond (Figure S7g). The biological activity of the released hBMP-6
from PA films using the different linkers was verified using C2C12
BRE-Luc cells (Figure ). The luciferase activity was increased when substantial quantities
of hBMP-6 were released from the surface. For example, in the case
of the GPTMS linker, a significant release of hBMP-6 after two days
coincided with an increase in luciferase activity. Significant luciferase
activity on imine films was only observed after five days, which indicates
a slower release of hBMP-6. No luciferase activity was observed on
surfaces where the imine bond was reduced into an irreversible secondary
amine bond, which indicates effectively blocked release of hBMP-6
from the surface. These results confirm that the covalent attachment
of hBMP-6 to a biomaterial surface was not biological active. This
activity can subsequently be recovered after hydrolysis of the linker
releasing the growth factor from the surface. By varying linker length
(GPTMS versus PGMA using epoxide linkage) or linking strategy (imine
versus secondary amine bonding), each with different susceptibility
to hydrolysis and thus release from the growth factor from the surface,
customizable bioactive surfaces can be engineered with spatio-temporal
control over growth factor activation.
Figure 6
Luminescence of C2C12
BRE-Luc at different time points relative
to the background. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. Surfaces: hBMP-6 supplemented to medium over PAOx (PAOx-shBMP-6),
hBMP-6 bound to GPTMS on PAOx (PAOx-GPTMS-bhBMP-6), hBMP-6 bound as
imine on PAOx (PAOx-bhBMP-6), and hBMP-6 bound via an amine resulting
of the reduction of the imine (PAOx-rbhBMP-6). Flat stamps were used
for immobilization of hBMP-6.
Luminescence of C2C12
BRE-Luc at different time points relative
to the background. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. Surfaces: nclass="Gene">hBMP-6 supplemented to medium over class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PAOx (PAOx-shBMP-6),
hBMP-6 bound to GPTMS on PAOx (PAOx-GPTMS-bhBMP-6), hBMP-6 bound as
imine on PAOx (PAOx-bhBMP-6), and hBMP-6 bound via an amine resulting
of the reduction of the imine (PAOx-rbhBMP-6). Flat stamps were used
for immobilization of hBMP-6.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated the use of hydrolyzable
linkers, such as nclass="Chemical">siloxane,
class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">ester, and imine, for immobilization and regulated release of hBMP-6
to model surfaces as well as biomaterials. Immobilized hBMP-6 is biologically
inactive. Upon release from the surface through hydrolysis of the
covalent bonds its biological activity is recovered. We established
a relation between the hydrolytic susceptibility of the bonds and
osteoblastic cell differentiation. The use of labile strategies for
the covalent attachment of growth factors to a surface with susceptibility
for hydrolysis provides the means to engineer biomaterial surfaces
with control over the dose of the growth factor to determine the release
of bioactive growth factors over prolonged periods of time. We anticipate
that this concept can be used to improve the design of a new generation
of growth factor delivery systems in controlled drug delivery and
for tissue engineering purposes.
Authors: Rashad Mammadov; Busra Mammadov; Sila Toksoz; Bahri Aydin; Ramazan Yagci; Ayse B Tekinay; Mustafa O Guler Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Dorota I Rozkiewicz; Yvonne Kraan; Marc W T Werten; Frits A de Wolf; Vinod Subramaniam; Bart Jan Ravoo; David N Reinhoudt Journal: Chemistry Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Karen L Christman; Vimary Vázquez-Dorbatt; Eric Schopf; Christopher M Kolodziej; Ronald C Li; Rebecca M Broyer; Yong Chen; Heather D Maynard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 15.419