| Literature DB >> 30005569 |
Jordi Cabanas-Danés1,2, Ellie Landman3, Jurriaan Huskens2, Marcel Karperien3, Pascal Jonkheijm1,2.
Abstract
Release of growth factors while simultaneously maintaining their full biological activity over a period of days to weeks is an important issue in controlled drug delivery and in tissue engineering. In addition, the selected strategy to immobilize growth factors largely determines their biological activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30005569 PMCID: PMC6143286 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Langmuir ISSN: 0743-7463 Impact factor: 3.882
Figure 1(a) Schematic overview of the preparation of epoxide-terminated glass substrates with two linkers of different length that have a difference in hydrolytic release: (3-glycidyloxypropyl)trimethoxysilane (GPTMS) (top) and poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) (bottom) and subsequent immobilization of hBMP-6 (accessible lysine residues are indicated in dark gray) by reactive microcontact printing (μCP) (atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)). (b) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) phase image of hBMP-6 micropatterned (10 μm diameter dots and 5 μm spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface without using a passivated background. (c) Zoom in of the phase image. (d) Fluorescence microscopy image (inset shows the intensity profile) of immunostained μCP patterns of hBMP-6 (100 μm diameter dots and 100 μm spacing) on an epoxide-terminated surface using a background passivated by NH2-PEG (see the Supporting Information for details).
Advancing (θa) and Receding (θb) Water Contact Angle Values, Ellipsometric Thicknesses, and N Fractions Determined by XPS of the Two Epoxide-Terminated Linkers before and after the Immobilization of hBMP-6
| monolayer (full) | θa [deg] | θb [deg] | ellipsometric thickness [nm] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPTMS | 55 ± 2 | 40 ± 5 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | – |
| GPTMS + hBMP-6 | 64 ± 5 | 47 ± 2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 |
| PGMA | 60 ± 1 | 52 ± 4 | 80 ± 3 | – |
| PGMA + hBMP-6 | 65 ± 1 | 41 ± 4 | 87 ± 2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
Not detected.
Figure 2Study of early osteogenesis in KS483 cells by immobilized hBMP-6. (a) Fluorescence microscopy image of hBMP-6 immobilized (by immersion 2 h in this case) on half of the substrate after immunofluorescence staining (inset shows averaged intensity profiles). (b) Immunohistochemical staining of ALP, after 4 days by KS483 cells (inset shows intensity profile with high (white) intensity indicative of low ALP activity). This slide was also prepared by immobilization of hBMP-6 by immersion (2 h). (c) ALP activity normalized by the total DNA content of KS483 cells after 6 days of culture, expressed as relative induction to a glass control in the presence of soluble (s (100 ng/mL)), bound (b), denatured bound (db) hBMP-6. Immobilization of hBMP-6 using flat stamps. (d) Dose response of KS483 cells cultured for 7 days in the presence of increasing concentrations of hBMP-6 in solution and two different amounts of bound hBMP-6, i.e., a full layer (100%, ca. 120 ng/cm2) of hBMP-6 and a μCP patterned layer of hBMP-6 (23% of the coverage in comparison to the full layer (using a flat stamp, ca. 28 ng/cm2). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Quantification of hBMP-6 in medium by ELISA (top) over a period of 15 days without (solid lines) and with (dashed lines) 5000 cells/cm2 on GPTMS and PGMA with initially μCP hBMP-6 (patterned stamps). Relative induction of ALP by KS483 cells after 4 days relative to a glass control (bottom). Black bars represent relative induction of cells seeded in contact with the films. White bars represent relative induction of cells seeded in transwell. **p < 0.01.
Figure 4(a) Luminescence of C2C12 cells transfected with BRE-Luc, measured at different time points relative to a background using the same surface without hBMP-6. Flat stamps were used for immobilization of hBMP-6. Inset shows the luminescence results at day 7 from an independent experiment. Gene expression analysis at days 1, 3, and 7 of (b) RUNX2 and (c) OCN was determined via the 2ΔΔCt method using the expression on day 1 on glass as a reference. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.
Figure 5(a) Molecular structure of the block-copolymer (PA) consisting of a hydrophilic block of poly(ethylene glycol terephthalate) (PEGT) and a hydrophobic block of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT). (b) 100 μm thick PA films were prepared by casting a solution of 3.4 wt% PA in chloroform overnight and cured above 60 °C for several hours. (c) Schematic procedure of the surface functionalization of PA films after preactivation using O2 plasma, with GPTMS. hBMP-6 is subsequently immobilized via reactive μCP on the activated film via the reaction between the primary amine groups (accessible lysine residues in dark gray) and aldehyde groups forming an imine bond (I), which is further reduced in order to increase its stability toward hydrolysis (II) or on the GPTMS (III) with unreacted aldehyde groups also available to tether the growth factor as in I.
Figure 6Luminescence of C2C12 BRE-Luc at different time points relative to the background. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. Surfaces: hBMP-6 supplemented to medium over PAOx (PAOx-shBMP-6), hBMP-6 bound to GPTMS on PAOx (PAOx-GPTMS-bhBMP-6), hBMP-6 bound as imine on PAOx (PAOx-bhBMP-6), and hBMP-6 bound via an amine resulting of the reduction of the imine (PAOx-rbhBMP-6). Flat stamps were used for immobilization of hBMP-6.