Literature DB >> 30005223

Complex narratives of health, stigma and control: Antimicrobial resistance screening among non-hospitalized refugees.

A Kamenshchikova1, P F G Wolffs2, C J Hoebe3, J Penders4, K Horstman5.   

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is often presented as a major public health problem globally. Screening for AMR usually takes place in clinical settings. Recent developments in microbiology stimulated a series of studies focusing on AMR in communities, and particularly in travelers (any mobile individual), which was argued to be important for identifying potential public health risks. Against this background, microbiologists have become interested in non-hospitalized refugees as one of the traveler groups. However, this attention to refugees has provoked some professional debates on potential stigmatization of refugees as dangerous "others". To contribute to these debates, and to explore the idea of AMR screening of non-hospitalized refugees from different perspectives, we conducted a qualitative study among four groups of stakeholders who were chosen because of their associations with potential microbiological screening: microbiologists, public health physicians, public health nurses, and refugees. The study took place in a Dutch city from June to August 2016 and had 17 participants: five microbiologists, two public health nurses, four public health physicians, and six refugees. While microbiologists and public health physicians demonstrated a de-contextualized biomedical narrative in arguing that AMR screening among non-hospitalized refugees could be important for scientific research as well as for AMR prevention in communities, public health nurses displayed a more contextualized narrative bringing the benefits for individuals at the center and indicating that screening exclusively among refugees may provoke fear and stigmatization. Refugees were rather positive about AMR screening but stressed that it should particularly contribute to their individual health. We conclude that to design AMR prevention strategies, it is important to consider the complex meanings of AMR screening, and to design these strategies as a process of co-production by diverse stakeholders, including the target populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance screening; Control; Health; Netherlands; Refugees; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30005223     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  2 in total

Review 1.  Social science research contributions to antimicrobial resistance: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Abou Ali Vedadhir; Carla Rodrigues; Helen Lambert
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-05

2.  The New Precision Stewards?

Authors:  Karen M Meagher; Sara Watson; Gina A Suh; Abinash Virk
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.