Literature DB >> 30005053

Pentacam Accuracy in Discriminating Keratoconus From Normal Corneas: A Diagnostic Evaluation Study.

Hassan Hashemi1, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Reza Pakzad, Salomeh Bakhshi, Hadi Ostadimoghaddam, Amir Asaharlous, Reihaneh Yekta, Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim, Abbasali Yekta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the diagnostic ability of Pentacam indices for keratoconus and identifying the best index for differentiating diseased from normal cases.
METHOD: In this study, 150 keratoconus patients and 150 refractive surgery candidates with a definitive diagnosis of normal healthy corneas were enrolled. Initially, the placido disk topography imaging was performed. The keratoconus and normal corneas were defined based on placido disk topographic data from Rabinowitz-McDonnell. After complete eye examinations for all participants, they underwent Pentacam imaging, and corneal surface topographic indices were extracted. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the best indices for differentiating diseased from healthy corneas, and the receiver operating curve was calculated to determine the diagnostic capability of each index.
RESULTS: Among the studied indices, the keratoconus index (KI), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), thinnest point (TP), and maximum keratometry (Kmax) were found capable of detecting keratoconus. Among these, IVA was the best index, with an area under curve (AUC) of 95.24%. The best cutoff point for IVA was 0.20 μm, and its sensitivity and specificity were 87.50% and 96.30%, respectively. Comparison of the AUC of different indices showed that only TP and IVA significantly differed (P=0.002). The combination of KI, IVA, Kmax, and TP indices leads to correct detection in 78% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Measuring corneal topographic indices using Pentacam can be helpful in the diagnosis of keratoconus. According to the results of this study, IVA is the best diagnostic index for keratoconus. However, it is recommended to use a combination of Pentacam indices for more accurate differentiation of keratoconus from normal cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30005053     DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye Contact Lens        ISSN: 1542-2321            Impact factor:   2.018


  9 in total

1.  Best indices of dual Scheimpflug/Placido tomographer for keratoconus detection.

Authors:  Zahra Heidari; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpour; Mehrdad Mohammadpour; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  [Early diagnosis of keratoconus].

Authors:  Stefan J Lang; P Maier; T Böhringer; T Reinhard
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Corneal topometric, aberrometric and biomechanical parameters in mucopolysaccharidosis patients.

Authors:  Joanna Wasielica-Poslednik; Alexander K Schuster; Giuseppe Politino; Susanne Marx-Gross; Katharina Bell; Norbert Pfeiffer; Susanne Pitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Pentacam® Corneal Tomography for Screening of Refractive Surgery Candidates: A Review of the Literature, Part I.

Authors:  Mahsaw N Motlagh; Majid Moshirfar; Michael S Murri; David F Skanchy; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Yasmyne C Ronquillo; Phillip C Hoopes
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2019

5.  Keratoconus Indices and their Determinants in Healthy Eyes of a Rural Population.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Reza Pakzad; Samira Heydarian; AbbasAli Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Mahdi Mortazavi; Shahroukh Ramin; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-12

6.  Distribution of Corneal Geometric Landmarks and Relationship Between Their Distances and Biomechanical Parameters in the Development of Keratoconus.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Hui Zhang; Li-Li Guo; Xiao Qin; Di Zhang; Lin Li; Ying Wu; Ying Jie; Haixia Zhang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-22

7.  Visual Corneal Photomechanical Analysis Is Combined with the Pentacam Correlation Index for the Diagnosis of Cone Corneas at Different Stages of Progression.

Authors:  Qiong Cheng; Feng Zhang; Tixian Tian; Lan Wu; Linna Li; Meixia Chen; Ye Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  The utility of measures of anterior segment parameters of a Pentacam Scheimpflug tomographer in discriminating high myopic astigmatism from keratoconus.

Authors:  Ebenezer Zaabaar; Samuel Kyei; Maame Ama Amamoah Parkson Brew; Samuel Bert Boadi-Kusi; Frank Assiamah; Kofi Asiedu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparative analysis of the morphological and biomechanical properties of normal cornea and keratoconus at different stages.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Li-Li Guo; Lei Tian; Ze-Quan Xu; Qian Li; Jian Hu; Yi-Fei Huang; Li-Qiang Wang
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.