Literature DB >> 30005047

Pedicle Screw Designs in Spinal Surgery: Is There a Difference? A Biomechanical Study on Primary and Revision Pull-Out Strength.

Wei Ren Daniel Seng1, Siaw Meng Chou2, Shiblee S Siddiqui1, Jacob Y L Oh1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An experimental laboratory-based biomechanical study.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a synthetic bone model, the difference in primary and revision pull-out strength using pedicle screws of different thread designs. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Over the past few decades, there has been a growing interest in optimizing the screw pull-out strength using various screw designs (single-thread, mixed-thread, dual-thread). Although primary pull-out strength has been studied previously, little is known about revision pull-out strength of different pedicle screws.
METHODS: The pull-out strengths of three different pedicle screw designs (single-thread, mixed-thread, dual-thread) were tested in standardized polyurethane foam in three sequences. Sequence 1: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted into the foam block and the primary pull-out strength measured. Sequence 2: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted, removed, and then reinserted into the same foam block. The revision pull-out strength was then measured. Sequence 3: A 6.5 mm screw was inserted, removed and a 7.5-mm screw of the same thread design was reinserted. The revision pull-out strength was then measured.
RESULTS: The primary pull-out strength was similar across screw designs, although dual-thread screws showed higher primary pull-out strength (2628.8 N) compared to single-thread screws (2184.4 N, P < 0.05). For revision pull-out strength, the mixed-thread screws had significant reduction in revision pull-out strength of 18.6% (1890.2 N, P = 0.0173). Revision with a larger diameter screw improved the pull-out strength back to baseline. Single and dual-thread screws showed no significant reduction in revision pull-out strength.
CONCLUSION: The dual-threaded screws provided the strongest primary pull-out strength for spinal fixation. The mixed-thread screws, however, had the poorest revision pull-out strength, decreasing by 18.6% compared to other screw designs. In cases in which mixed-threaded screws have to be revised (at the index or revision surgery), surgeons should consider the use of larger diameter screws to improve the pull-out strength. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30005047     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  Replacement of Destructive Pull-out Test with Modal Analysis in Primary Fixation Stability Assessment of Spinal Pedicle Screw.

Authors:  Mohammadjavad Einafshar; Ata Hashemi; Gerrit Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-02

Review 2.  Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review.

Authors:  Esther P de Kater; Aimée Sakes; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander; Gerald Kraan; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Enhancing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with hydroxyapatite granules: A biomechanical study using an osteoporotic bone model.

Authors:  Haruo Kanno; Toshimi Aizawa; Ko Hashimoto; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.