Literature DB >> 30004921

Global Surgery: Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery.

Charles Mock1, Haile Debas2, Charles M Balch3, Murray Brennan4, Jo Buyske5, James Cusack6, Steven DeMeester7, David Herndon8, Ai-Xuan Le Holterman9, Bernard Jaffe10, Emad Kandil10, Gordon Kauffman11, George Mazariegos12, Nipun sMerchant13, Patricia Numann14, Dmitry Oleynikov15, Oluyinka Olutoye16, James O'Neill17, Steven Shackford18, Peter Stock2, John L Tarpley17, Todd Tuttle19, Steven Wolf20, Sherry M Wren21, George P Yang22.   

Abstract

: There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30004921     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  4 in total

Review 1.  Capacity Building During Short-Term Surgical Outreach Trips: A Review of What Guidelines Exist.

Authors:  Chelsea Leversedge; Meghan McCullough; Luis Miguel Castro Appiani; Mùng Phan Đình; Robin N Kamal; Lauren M Shapiro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A systematic review of global surgery partnerships and a proposed framework for sustainability.

Authors:  Nicole Jedrzejko; Joseph Margolick; Jenny Hoang Nguyen; Maylynn Ding; Phyllis Kisa; Elenor Ball-Banting; Morad Hameed; Emilie Joos
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Academic Pediatric Surgery Capacity Building in Vietnam Through PASS, a Pediatric Acute Surgical Support Course.

Authors:  Bich-Uyen Nguyen; Aixuan Holterman; Mark Holterman; Le-Thanh Dinh
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Chantalle Lauren Grant; Tessa Robinson; Alreem Al Hinai; Cheryl Mack; Regan Guilfoyle; Abdullah Saleh
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-04-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.