Literature DB >> 30004917

Postoperative Acute Pancreatitis Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Determinant of Fistula Potentially Driven by the Intraoperative Fluid Management.

Elisa Bannone1, Stefano Andrianello, Giovanni Marchegiani, Gaia Masini, Giuseppe Malleo, Claudio Bassi, Roberto Salvia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to characterize postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: A standardized definition of POAP after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been recently proposed, but specific studies are lacking.
METHODS: The patients were extracted from the prospective database of The Pancreas Institute of Verona. POAP was defined as an elevation of the serum pancreatic amylase levels above the upper limit of normal (52 U/L) on postoperative day (POD) 0 or 1. The endpoints included defining the incidence and predictors of POAP and investigating the association of POAP with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 292 patients who underwent PD. The POAP and POPF rates were 55.8% and 22.3%, respectively. POAP was an independent predictor of POPF (OR 3.8), with a 92% sensitivity and 53.7% specificity (AUC 0.79). Preoperative exocrine insufficiency (OR 0.39), neoadjuvant therapy (OR 0.29) additional resection of the pancreatic stump margin (OR 0.25), soft pancreatic texture (OR 4.38), and Main Pancreatic Duct (MPD) diameter ≤3 mm (OR 2.86) were independent predictors of POAP. In high-risk patients, an intraoperative fluid administration of ≤3 ml/kg/h was associated with an increased incidence of POAP (24.6 vs. 0%, P = 0.04) and POPF (27.6 vs. 11.4%, P = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study represents the first clinical application of the only available definition of POAP as a specific complication of pancreatic surgery. POAP is associated with an increased occurrence of POPF and overall morbidity and could potentially be avoided through a specific intraoperative fluid regimen in high-risk pancreas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30004917     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Gaia Masini; Alberto Balduzzi; Salvatore Paiella; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Luca Casetti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 2.  Pancreatoduodenectomy associated with colonic resections: indications, pitfalls, and outcomes.

Authors:  Tommaso Giuliani; Anthony Di Gioia; Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-13

3.  Autologous transplantation of multilayered fibroblast sheets prevents postoperative pancreatic fistula by regulating fibrosis and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Keisuke Iwamoto; Toshiro Saito; Yoshihiro Takemoto; Koji Ueno; Masashi Yanagihara; Tomoko Furuya-Kondo; Hiroshi Kurazumi; Yuya Tanaka; Yohei Taura; Eijiro Harada; Kimikazu Hamano
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Is routine CT scan after pancreaticoduodenectomy a useful tool in the early detection of complications? A single center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michele Mazzola; Pietro Calcagno; Alessandro Giani; Marianna Maspero; Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio; Paolo De Martini; Carmelo Magistro; Cristiano Sgrazzutti; Angelo Vanzulli; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Outcomes comparison of Pancreato-Gastrostomy and Isolated Jejunal Loop Pancreato-Jejunostomy following Pancreato-Duodenectomy in patients with soft pancreas and at moderate-high risk for POPF: a retrospective multicenter experience-based analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Zimmitti; Alessandro Coppola; Francesco Ardito; Roberto Meniconi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Edoardo Rosso; Alberto Manzoni; Marco Colasanti; Gennaro Clemente; Marino Murazio; Felice Giuliante
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-11-11

6.  Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Piia Peltoniemi; Pertti Pere; Harri Mustonen; Hanna Seppänen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Risk Factors and Clinical Impacts of Post-Pancreatectomy Acute Pancreatitis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 298 Patients Based on the ISGPS Definition and Grading System.

Authors:  Shuai Wu; Hanxue Wu; Guiping Xu; Yaling Zhao; Feng Xue; Shunbin Dong; Liang Han; Zheng Wang; Zheng Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-04

8.  Postoperative acute pancreatitis after pancreatic resection in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masaaki Murakawa; Yuto Kamioka; Shinnosuke Kawahara; Naoto Yamamoto; Satoshi Kobayashi; Makoto Ueno; Manabu Morimoto; Hiroshi Tamagawa; Takashi Ohshima; Norio Yukawa; Yasushi Rino; Munetaka Masuda; Soichiro Morinaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Early biochemical predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a role for serum amylase and C-reactive protein.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Giovanni Guarneri; Marco Palucci; Lorenzo Gozzini; Alessia Vallorani; Stefano Crippa; Stefano Partelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 10.  Indications to total pancreatectomy for positive neck margin after partial pancreatectomy: a review of a slippery ground.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Giulio Belfiori; Domenico Tamburrino; Stefano Partelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.