Literature DB >> 30004852

Attentional Fluctuations Influence the Neural Fidelity and Connectivity of Stimulus Representations.

David Rothlein1, Joseph DeGutis1,2, Michael Esterman1,3.   

Abstract

Attention is thought to facilitate both the representation of task-relevant features and the communication of these representations across large-scale brain networks. However, attention is not "all or none," but rather it fluctuates between stable/accurate (in-the-zone) and variable/error-prone (out-of-the-zone) states. Here we ask how different attentional states relate to the neural processing and transmission of task-relevant information. Specifically, during in-the-zone periods: (1) Do neural representations of task stimuli have greater fidelity? (2) Is there increased communication of this stimulus information across large-scale brain networks? Finally, (3) can the influence of performance-contingent reward be differentiated from zone-based fluctuations? To address these questions, we used fMRI and representational similarity analysis during a visual sustained attention task (the gradCPT). Participants ( n = 16) viewed a series of city or mountain scenes, responding to cities (90% of trials) and withholding to mountains (10%). Representational similarity matrices, reflecting the similarity structure of the city exemplars ( n = 10), were computed from visual, attentional, and default mode networks. Representational fidelity (RF) and representational connectivity (RC) were quantified as the interparticipant reliability of representational similarity matrices within (RF) and across (RC) brain networks. We found that being in the zone was characterized by increased RF in visual networks and increasing RC between visual and attentional networks. Conversely, reward only increased the RC between the attentional and default mode networks. These results diverge with analogous analyses using functional connectivity, suggesting that RC and functional connectivity in tandem better characterize how different mental states modulate the flow of information throughout the brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30004852     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Individual differences in sustained attention are associated with cortical thickness.

Authors:  Alex Mitko; David Rothlein; Victoria Poole; Meghan Robinson; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; David Salat; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Prediction of stimulus-independent and task-unrelated thought from functional brain networks.

Authors:  Eve M Valera; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Aaron Kucyi; Michael Esterman; James Capella; Allison Green; Mai Uchida; Joseph Biederman; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  The impact of image degradation and temporal dynamics on sustained attention.

Authors:  Julia M Brau; Alexander Sugarman; David Rothlein; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman; Francesca C Fortenbaugh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  An executive function subtype of PTSD with unique neural markers and clinical trajectories.

Authors:  Audreyana Jagger-Rickels; David Rothlein; Anna Stumps; Travis Clark Evans; John Bernstein; William Milberg; Regina McGlinchey; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.989

5.  Evidence for a Specific Association Between Sustained Attention and Gait Speed in Middle-to-Older-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Hannah Park; Courtney Aul; Joseph DeGutis; On-Yee Lo; Victoria N Poole; Regina McGlinchey; Jonathan F Bean; Elizabeth Leritz; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations.

Authors:  Aaron Kucyi; Amy Daitch; Omri Raccah; Baotian Zhao; Chao Zhang; Michael Esterman; Michael Zeineh; Casey H Halpern; Kai Zhang; Jianguo Zhang; Josef Parvizi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Variable rather than extreme slow reaction times distinguish brain states during sustained attention.

Authors:  Ayumu Yamashita; David Rothlein; Aaron Kucyi; Eve M Valera; Laura Germine; Jeremy Wilmer; Joseph DeGutis; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.