| Literature DB >> 30004459 |
Liu Chu1, Jiajia Shi2, Eduardo Souza de Cursi3.
Abstract
The stochastic distributed placement of vacancy defects has evident efEntities:
Keywords: Monte Carlo based finite element method; natural frequencies; vacancy defects
Year: 2018 PMID: 30004459 PMCID: PMC6070932 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Schematic of a monolayer graphene.
Figure 2Flowchart of Monte Carlo based finite element method.
Comparing the natural frequencies obtained from present model with that in references [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
| Reference | Simulation Method | Elastic Modulus (TPa) | Poisson’s Ratio | 1/THz | 2/THz | 3/THz | 4/THz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu [ | DFT | 1.050 | 0.186 | 1.6081 | 3.7232 | 4.3172 | 6.4323 |
| Kudin [ | DFT | 1.029 | 0.149 | 1.5818 | 3.6623 | 4.2466 | 6.3271 |
| Gupta [ | MD | 1.272 | 0.147 | 1.7581 | 4.0706 | 4.7201 | 7.0325 |
| Lu [ | MD | 0.725 | 0.398 | 1.4311 | 3.3135 | 3.8422 | 5.7246 |
| Wei [ | DFT | 1.039 | 0.169 | 1.5946 | 3.6921 | 4.2811 | 6.3786 |
| Cadelano [ | TB | 0.931 | 0.310 | 1.5649 | 3.6232 | 4.2012 | 6.2595 |
| Reddy [ | MM | 0.669 | 0.416 | 1.3869 | 3.2111 | 3.7234 | 5.5475 |
| Zhou [ | MM | 1.167 | 0.456 | 1.8716 | 4.3334 | 5.0248 | 7.4865 |
| Khatibi [ | MD + FDD | 1.050 | 0.170 | 1.6030 | 2.4970 | 2.5980 | 3.5770 |
| Present | SFEM | 1.200 | 0.200 | 1.7282 | 3.2925 | 3.7442 | 5.1892 |
Figure 3Comparison natural frequencies of present model with that in literatures.
Figure 4Randomly distributed vacancy in graphene sheet by Monte Carlo simulation.
Statistical results of natural frequencies for Monte Carlo based finite element model
| Mode | Mean (THz) | Variance^0.5 | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 1 | 1.721 | 0.002 | −0.852 | 5.179 |
| 2 | 3.279 | 0.004 | −0.646 | 3.751 | |
| 3 | 3.729 | 0.006 | −0.536 | 3.935 | |
| 4 | 5.168 | 0.005 | −0.620 | 3.625 | |
| 1 | 1 | 1.714 | 0.003 | −0.446 | 3.144 |
| 2 | 3.265 | 0.006 | −0.559 | 3.558 | |
| 3 | 3.713 | 0.008 | −0.495 | 3.537 | |
| 4 | 5.146 | 0.007 | −0.308 | 2.757 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1.602 | 0.292 | −5.313 | 29.246 |
| 2 | 3.007 | 0.547 | −5.312 | 29.240 | |
| 3 | 3.512 | 0.639 | −5.312 | 29.242 | |
| 4 | 4.730 | 0.861 | −5.312 | 29.243 | |
| 5 | 1 | 1.172 | 0.584 | −1.488 | 3.247 |
| 2 | 1.752 | 0.871 | −1.491 | 3.270 | |
| 3 | 2.196 | 1.090 | −1.501 | 3.300 | |
| 4 | 2.429 | 1.204 | −1.509 | 3.316 |
Figure 5Results of defected graphene sheets with different amount of vacancy defects (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively).
Figure 6Results of defected graphene sheets with different L (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively).
Figure 7Statistical results of defected graphene sheets with different D (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively).
Figure 8Statistical results of defected graphene sheets with different N (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively).
Figure 9Statistical results of defected graphene sheets with different Young’s modulus (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively). E is Young’s modulus of graphene sheets.
Figure 10Statistical results of defected graphene sheets with different Poisson ratio (a–c for mean, standard variance and of natural frequency, respectively). V is Poisson ratio.
Figure 11Displacement vector sum for graphene with 5% vacancy defects (a–d show the first order, second order, third order, and fourth order of vibration mode, respectively).
Figure 12Rotation vector sum for graphene with 5% vacancy defects (a–d represent the first order, second order, third order, and fourth order of vibration mode, respectively).