| Literature DB >> 30004040 |
Han Wu1,2,3, Wen-Hao Tang1,2,3,4, Lian-Ming Zhao1,2,3, De-Feng Liu2,3, Yu-Zhuo Yang2,3,4, Hai-Tao Zhang1,2,3, Zhe Zhang1,2,3, Kai Hong1,2,3, Hao-Cheng Lin1,2,3, Hui Jiang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Stem cell therapy is a potentially promising option for erectile dysfunction; however, its risk of tumorigenicity is a clinical hurdle and the risk is positively related to the number of injected cells. Our previous study showed that nanotechnology improved adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC) therapy for erectile dysfunction of cavernous nerve injury (CNI) by attracting cells in the corpus cavernosum. These results indicated the possibility of using a reduced dosage of ADSCs for intracavernous injection. In this exploratory study, we used lower dosage (2 × 105 cells) of ADSCs for intracavernous injection (ICI) and the nanotechnology approach. Intracavernous pressure and mean arterial pressure were measured at day 28 to assess erectile function. The low-dose ADSC therapy group showed favorable treatment effects, and nanotechnology further improved these effects. In vivo imaging of ICI cells revealed that the fluorescein signals of NanoShuttle-bound ADSCs (NanoADSCs) were much stronger than those of ADSCs at days 0, 1, and 3. Both immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis showed a significant increase in smooth muscle, endothelium, and nerve tissue in the ADSC group compared to that in the CNI group; further improvement was achieved with assisted nanotechnology. These findings demonstrate that nanotechnology can be used to further improve the effect of small dosage of ADSCs to improve erectile function. Abundant NanoADSCs remain in the corpus cavernosum in vivo for at least 3 days. The mechanism of erectile function improvement may be related to the regeneration of the smooth muscle, endothelium, and nerve tissues.Entities:
Keywords: adipose-derived stem cell (ADSC); cavernous nerve injury; cell tracking; erectile dysfunction
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30004040 PMCID: PMC6116694 DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_48_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Androl ISSN: 1008-682X Impact factor: 3.285
Figure 1Morphology of cultured ADSC- and GFP-positive cells. (a) Passage 3 ADSCs were in fibroblast-like shape. (b) Fluorescence images of passage 3-infected ADSCs at an MOI of 100. Scale bars = 100 μm. ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; MOI: multiplicity of infection; GFP: green-fluorescent protein.
Figure 2Cytometry analysis of the cultured passage 2 ADSC suspension. (a) SSC and FSC of cell suspension detected by flow cytometry, P1-enclosed suspicious cells. (b) P2-enclosed cells positively stained with CD29 and CD90. (c) Few cells positively stained with CD31 and CD45 were detected. (d) The percentage of target cells within P1 and P2 boxes. ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; SSC: side scatter; FSC: forward scatter; A: area. P1: box enclosed cells except debris; P2: box enclosed CD29 and CD90 double positive cells among P1 box.
Figure 3In vivo imaging. (a) In situ colonization of 2 × 105 injected cells (by measuring signal within the ROIs) on rat injected with ADSCs and without peri-penis magnetic field (Rat A) and NanoADSC-injected rat with assisted magnetic field (Rat B) at days 0, 1, 3, and 7. (b) Clear decreases in fluorescence signal were observed in both rats, and the trend was more moderate in Rat B. (c) Signal of bilateral lung area in Rat A was higher than that in Rat B on day 0. ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; NanoADSCs: NanoShuttle-bound ADSCs; ROI: region of interest.
Figure 4Erectile function evaluation. (a) Curves of ICP during erection under electrostimulation of the CN; black lines represent the stimulation window of 1 min. (b) Pressures of the carotid artery in each group. (c) Bar graphs show the values of mean ICP, ICP/MAP, and total ICP in response to cavernous nerve stimulation on day 28. aP < 0.05, other groups versus Cont group. bP < 0.05, other groups versus CNI group. cP < 0.05, other groups versus ADSC group. Cont: control; CNI: cavernous nerve injury; ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; MagADSC: magnetic field-assisted nanotechnology-treated ADSC; ICP: intracavernous pressure; MAP: mean arterial pressure.
Figure 5Protein expression at the four groups on day 28, as evaluated by Western blot analysis. (a) α-SMA expression. (b) Protein expression of β III tubulin in rat penis from different groups. (c) CD31 expression in each group. Intergroup differences were evaluated by independent t-test. aP < 0.05, other groups versus Cont group. bP < 0.05, other groups versus CNI group. cP < 0.05, other groups versus ADSC group. α-SMA: alpha-smooth muscle actin; β III tubulin: Tubb3 protein; CD31: platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; MagADSC: magnetic field-assisted nanotechnology-treated ADSC; ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; Cont: control; CNI: cavernous nerve injury.
Figure 6Smooth muscle, nerve, and endothelial contents in the CC. Immunohistochemical staining of (a) α-SMA in the smooth muscle, (b) β III tubulin in the nerve, and (c) CD31 in the endothelium. Statistical charts showing Cy3-positive areas of (d) α-SMA, (e) β III tubulin, and (f) CD31 in each group. Scale bars = 100 μm. aP < 0.05, other groups versus Cont group. bP < 0.05, other groups versus CNI group. cP < 0.05, other groups versus ADSC group. Cont: control; CNI: cavernous nerve injury; ADSC: adipose-derived stem cell; MagADSC: magnetic field-assisted nanotechnology-treated ADSC; α-SMA: alpha-smooth muscle actin; β III tubulin: Tubb3 protein. P-area: positive area; T-area: total area.