Pingxing Xie1, Philippe Lefrançois2. 1. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 2. Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Electronic address: philippe.lefrancois2@mail.mcgill.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SHHis) provide an additional treatment option for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), especially for metastatic or locally advanced BCC. However, studies have been heterogeneous and lacked direct comparisons between molecules. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the class of molecules SHHi for treating BCC and to compare them individually. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-compliant systematic review of studies followed by a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were included in our meta-analysis; 16 articles were combined for efficacy and 16 for safety. In locally advanced BCC, overall response rates (ORRs) were similar for vismodegib and sonidegib (69% vs 57%, respectively) but not complete response rates (31% vs 3%, respectively). In metastatic disease, the ORR of vismodegib was 2.7-fold higher than the ORR of sonidegib (39% vs 15%, respectively). For side effects affecting a majority of patients, prevalences for muscle spasms (67.1%), dysgeusia (54.1%), and alopecia (57.7%) were in similar proportions for sonidegib and vismodegib. Patients receiving sonidegib experienced more upper gastrointestinal distress than patients receiving vismodegib. CONCLUSION: SHHis induce a partial response to locally advanced BCC disease. Side effects are common, similar across molecules, associated with high discontinuation rates, and warrant discussion beforehand.
BACKGROUND: Sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SHHis) provide an additional treatment option for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), especially for metastatic or locally advanced BCC. However, studies have been heterogeneous and lacked direct comparisons between molecules. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of the class of molecules SHHi for treating BCC and to compare them individually. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-compliant systematic review of studies followed by a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen articles were included in our meta-analysis; 16 articles were combined for efficacy and 16 for safety. In locally advanced BCC, overall response rates (ORRs) were similar for vismodegib and sonidegib (69% vs 57%, respectively) but not complete response rates (31% vs 3%, respectively). In metastatic disease, the ORR of vismodegib was 2.7-fold higher than the ORR of sonidegib (39% vs 15%, respectively). For side effects affecting a majority of patients, prevalences for muscle spasms (67.1%), dysgeusia (54.1%), and alopecia (57.7%) were in similar proportions for sonidegib and vismodegib. Patients receiving sonidegib experienced more upper gastrointestinal distress than patients receiving vismodegib. CONCLUSION: SHHis induce a partial response to locally advanced BCC disease. Side effects are common, similar across molecules, associated with high discontinuation rates, and warrant discussion beforehand.
Authors: Priyadharsini Nagarajan; Maryam M Asgari; Adele C Green; Samantha M Guhan; Sarah T Arron; Charlotte M Proby; Dana E Rollison; Catherine A Harwood; Amanda Ewart Toland Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Florien Westendorp; Olga N Karpus; Pim J Koelink; Jacqueline L M Vermeulen; Sander Meisner; Jan Koster; Nikè V J A Büller; Manon E Wildenberg; Vanesa Muncan; Gijs R van den Brink Journal: Oncogene Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Ivan J Stojanov; Inga-Marie Schaefer; Reshma S Menon; Jay Wasman; Hamza N Gokozan; Elizabeth P Garcia; Dale A Baur; Sook-Bin Woo; Lynette M Sholl Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 6.298