Literature DB >> 30003829

Prognostic factors of ulcer healing and amputation-free survival in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Tadashi Furuyama1, Toshihiro Onohara2, Sho Yamashita1, Ryosuke Yoshiga1, Keiji Yoshiya1, Kentaro Inoue1, Koichi Morisaki1, Ryoichi Kyuragi2, Takuya Matsumoto3, Yoshihiko Maehara1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A multidisciplinary approach is required to treat critical limb ischemia. We determined the poor prognostic factors of ischemic ulcer healing after optimal arterial revascularization, and assessed the efficacy of the medication therapy using cilostazol, which is a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 3.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, cohort study, 129 limbs that underwent infrainguinal arterial revascularization for Rutherford class 5 critical limb ischemia were reviewed. The primary end point was the ulcer healing time after arterial revascularization. The secondary end point was the amputation-free survival rate.
RESULTS: Of the 129 limbs, endovascular therapy was performed in 69 limbs, and surgical reconstructive procedures were performed in 60 limbs for initial therapy. Complete ulcer healing was achieved in 95 limbs (74%). The median ulcer healing time was 90 days. In multivariate analysis, no cilostazol use significantly inhibited ulcer healing ( p = 0.0114). A white blood cell count >10,000 ( p = 0.0185), a major defect after debridement ( p = 0.0215), and endovascular therapy ( p = 0.0308) were significant poor prognostic factors for ulcer healing. Additionally, ischemic heart disease ( p < 0.0001), albumin levels <3 g/dl ( p = 0.0016), no cilostazol use ( p = 0.0078), and a major defect after debridement ( p = 0.0208) were significant poor prognostic factors for amputation-free survival rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Ulcer healing within 90 days after arterial revascularization is impaired by no cilostazol use, a white blood cell count >10,000, a major defect after debridement, and endovascular therapy. Furthermore, cilostazol improves amputation-free survival rate in patients with critical limb ischemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical limb ischemia; amputation-free survival; cilostazol; optimal medical therapy; ulcer healing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30003829     DOI: 10.1177/1708538118786864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  3 in total

1.  Laboratory markers as useful prognostic measures for survival in patients with spinal metastases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Marco L Ferrone; Peter G Passias; Justin A Blucher; Lauren B Barton; John H Shin; Mitchel B Harris; Joseph H Schwab
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of cilostazol on limb salvage rates after infrainguinal endovascular and open revascularization.

Authors:  Kshitij Desai; Britta Han; Laila Kuziez; Yan Yan; Mohamed A Zayed
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Heal or no heel: Outcomes of ischaemic heel ulcers following lower limb revascularization from a multi-ethnic Asian Cohort in Singapore.

Authors:  Yun Le Linn; Sze Ling Chan; Shereen Xue Yun Soon; Charyl Jia Qi Yap; Mervin Nathan Han Hui Lim; Qing Wei Shaun Lee; Tze Tec Chong; Tjun Yip Tang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.