Literature DB >> 30003799

DSM Borderline Criterion Function Across Age-Groups: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Method Study.

Carla Sharp1,2, Lynne Steinberg1, Jared Michonski3, Allison Kalpakci1, Chris Fowler2,4, B Christopher Frueh5, Peter Fonagy6.   

Abstract

DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) Section II criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD) lack developmental operationalization. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether DSM criteria operate similarly across adolescents and adults to determine if developmental adjustment for DSM criteria was needed. Three age cohorts were recruited: adolescents (ages 12-17 years; n = 484), young adults (ages 18-25 years; n = 442), and adults (ages ≥26 years; n = 953). The Child Interview for DSM-IV BPD and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders were administered to adolescents and adults, respectively. Item response theory methods were used to evaluate differential item (or criterion) functioning (DIF) of BPD criteria across adolescents and adults. Qualitative analyses were then used to evaluate the potential sources of DIF. Item response theory results demonstrated DIF across adolescents and adults for all DSM BPD criteria. Qualitative analyses suggested that the source of DIF was most likely due to rater/interviewer bias. Results furthermore suggested that behavioral criteria may represent the heterotypic features of BPD, while intra- and interpersonal criteria represent the homotypic features of the disorder. The article concludes with recommendations for developmentally informed guidelines for the assessment of BPD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; borderline personality pathology; developmental continuity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30003799     DOI: 10.1177/1073191118786587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  3 in total

1.  Neurophysiological activity following rewards and losses among female adolescents and young adults with borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Jeremy G Stewart; Paris Singleton; Erik M Benau; Dan Foti; Hannah Allchurch; Cynthia S Kaplan; Blaise Aguirre; Randy P Auerbach
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-07-18

Review 2.  Future directions in personality pathology development research from a trainee perspective: Suggestions for theory, methodology, and practice.

Authors:  Benjamin N Johnson; Salome Vanwoerden
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2020-08-20

Review 3.  Designing a range of mentalizing interventions for young people using a clinical staging approach to borderline pathology.

Authors:  Joost Hutsebaut; Martin Debbané; Carla Sharp
Journal:  Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul       Date:  2020-03-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.