| Literature DB >> 30003178 |
Amrita Pal1, Brent L Vernon1, Mehdi Nikkhah1.
Abstract
The aim of therapeutic neovascularization is to repair ischemic tissues via formation of new blood vessels by delivery of angiogenic growth factors, stem cells or expansion of pre-existing cells. For efficient neovascularization, controlled release of growth factors is particularly necessary since bolus injection of molecules generally lead to a poor outcome due to inadequate retention within the injured site. In this regard, injectable hydrogels, made of natural, synthetic or hybrid biomaterials, have become a promising solution for efficient delivery of angiogenic factors or stem and progenitor cells for in situ tissue repair, regeneration and neovascularization. This review article will broadly discuss the state-of-the-art in the development of injectable hydrogels from natural and synthetic precursors, and their applications in ischemic tissue repair and wound healing. We will cover a wide range of in vitro and in vivo studies in testing the functionalities of the engineered injectable hydrogels in promoting tissue repair and neovascularization. We will also discuss some of the injectable hydrogels that exhibit self-healing properties by promoting neovascularization without the presence of angiogenic factors.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenic factors; Cell-therapy; Injectable hydrogels; Neovascularization; Tissue regeneration
Year: 2018 PMID: 30003178 PMCID: PMC6038261 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Brief summary of the injectable hydrogels and their effects during assay.
| Hydrogels | Assay | Factors | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chitosan | In vivo | FGF-2 | Neovascularization by controlled growth factor release [ |
| In vitro & | Acellular | Better spreading and assembly of cultured HUVECs in the | |
| In vivo | |||
| In vivo | Acellular | Increase of M2 macrophage response and neovascularization [ | |
| In vitro & | Acellular | Increased vasculogenesis in the | |
| In vivo | |||
| In vivo | ESC/bFGF | Improvement of myocardial ischemia (MI) [ | |
| In vivo | Acellular | Better angiogenic activity in peptide modified gel [ | |
| HA | In vivo | EPC | Significant increase of vascularization leading to improvements in myocardial remodeling [ |
| In vivo | ESA | Retention of the infarcted tissue by vasculogenesis [ | |
| In vivo | Acellular & ADSC | Significant healing of the damaged skin by rapid cell proliferation and angiogenesis [ | |
| In vivo | HADSC | Wound healing in the ischemic heart due to angiogenesis [ | |
| In vivo | Acellular | Functional recovery of infarcted heart due to the increased number of arterioles and capillaries [ | |
| In vivo | bFGF | Considerable increase of neovascularization [ | |
| Collagen | In vivo | Acellular | Angiogenesis in the infarcted region of myocardium [ |
| In vivo | CAC | Increased mechanical stability as well as expression level of proangiogenic cytokine [ | |
| In vivo | PC | Higher arteriole and capillary density in the hindlimb muscle [ | |
| Gelatin | In vivo | bFGF | Significant prolonged and transient neovascularization from bFGF loaded acidic and basic gelatin hydrogel respectively [ |
| In vivo | bFGF | Significant increase of the collateral vessel formation with bFGF loaded AGHMs in the ischemic hindlimb [ | |
| In vitro & | VEGF | Sustained release of VEGF from the gel with high bioactivity [ | |
| In vivo | Significant angiogenesis by the increase of blood vessel density [ | ||
| In vivo | bFGF and BDNF | Higher vessel density and LVEF in the ischemic myocardium [ | |
| In vivo | bFGF and hCDC | Neoangiogenesis and significant retention of transplanted hCDCs in the ischemic area leading to improved cardiac function [ | |
| In vivo | CM | Efficient engraftment of CMs with the host and significant increase of angiogenic cytokines [ | |
| In vivo | MSC | Extensive neovascularization [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Angiogenesis in VEGF loaded GelMA hydrogel [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Vascularization by significant increase of capillary and arteriole density in the infarct region, resulting in improved cardiac function [ | |
| Fibrin | In vivo | With and without SM | Neovascularization causing the reduction of infarcted myocardium both with or without SM [ |
| In vivo | Acellular | Neovascularization resulting improvements in cardiac function by reducing infarct scar percentage [ | |
| In vitro & | bFGF | Decreased bFGF release rate in the | |
| In vivo | |||
| In vitro | VEGF | Increased growth of cells in the presence of VEGF modified fibrin gel [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Angiogenesis in the muscle indicated by significant increase in the vessel length density due to the controlled release of VEGF [ | |
| PNIPAAm | In vivo | bFGF | Increased angiogenesis resulting in a 2-fold improvement in relative blood flow to the infarcted myocardium [ |
| Considerable recovery of cardiac function in the chronic infarcted myocardium due to increased angiogenesis [ | |||
| PEG | In vivo | VEGF | Significant neovascularization due to the sustained release of VEGF [ |
| In vivo | C16 and Ac-SDKP | Promotion of angiogenesis, muscle regeneration and minimized detrimental inflammation in the peripheral artery disease [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Neovascularization by the sustained release of VEGF in the infract region [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Enhanced angiogenesis and space filling of the cornea micropocket [ | |
| In vivo | HGF and VEGF | Significant increase in angiogenesis, stem cell recruitment, and decrease in fibrosis was observed in the dual growth factor delivery group [ | |
| In vivo | CPC | Non-adhesive RDG gels codelivered with CPCs showed improved cardiac function whereas ECM-derived adhesive peptide-presenting gels failed to show the recovery of cardiac function [ | |
| In vivo | VEGF | Lowest degradation time for | |
| PLGA | Significant enhancement of angiogenic activity due to the controlled release of bFGF in the ischemic tissue [ | ||
| Synthetic peptide | In vitro & | IGF-1C | Increased stem cell viability in presence of IGF-1C hydrogel in the |
| In vivo | ADSC | ||
| In vivo | Acellular | Increased blood vessel formation in the VEGF memetic peptide than non angiogenic peptide [ |
Fig. 1(i-iv) Chemical structure of natural polymers being used as injectable hydrogel scaffold. (v) Representative H&E stained histological images of the vascularization for the different groups of injected chitosan hydrogel using rat model on day 4, 8, and 14 post-injection. (vi) Quantification of capillary number for different injection groups on Day 4, 8 and 14. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier [Biomaterials] copyright (2004)[35]. (vii) Representative H&E stained histological images of skin and subcutaneous tissue after 14 days of surgery with different groups of implantation. (vii) Neovascularization index after day 14 of the surgery. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier [Biomaterials] copyright (2005) [51].
Fig. 2(i-ii) Chemical structures of synthetic polymers being used as injectable hydrogel scaffold. (iv) Angiogenic effects due to the release of bFGF from pH-responsive p (NIPAAm-co-PAA-co-BA) hydrogel. Representative images of the histological sections of the tissues with rat endothelial cell antigen-1 (RECA-1) staining (a-d) and smooth muscle α-actin (α-SMA) staining (f-i). Quantification of capillary density by RECA-1 (v) and arteriolar density by α-SMA (vi) staining. (Adapted with permission from Elsevier [Biomaterials] copyright (2011)[89]. (vii) Schematic representation of proposed mechanism of wound healing using nanofibrous SLanc hydrogels (A-D). (Adapted with permission from ACS Publications [ACS Nano] copyright (2015) [101].