Literature DB >> 30002691

Expression of UCA1 and MALAT1 long-chain non-coding RNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues is predictive of patient prognosis.

Kai Kang1, Yong-Hua Huang2, Hai-Peng Li2, Shu-Mei Guo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) urothelial cancer associated 1 (UCA1) and metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) are known to impact cancer cell regulation. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between the expression of these lncRNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues and disease prognosis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The expression of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs was assessed in ESCC and adjacent carcinoma tissues (5 cm away from the tumor) and evaluated in relation to overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients. This prospective study included 100 ESCC patients who were admitted to the First Hospital of Yulin City between January 2007 and January 2014.
RESULTS: The expression levels of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs in ESCC tissues were significantly higher than those in adjacent carcinoma tissues, and there were statistically significant differences in TNM staging between the patients with high lncRNA expression and low lncRNA expression. The OS and DFS of patients with high UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels were significantly shorter than those with low expression levels. Furthermore, the OS and DFS of ESCC patients appeared to be correlated with TNM staging.
CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that the up-regulation of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs in ESCC tissues can impact the degree of tumor progression and is predictive of postoperative survival. Therefore, the expression levels of these lncRNAs can be used as measurement indexes to determine the prognosis of ESCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; long non-coding RNA; metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1; prognosis; survival analysis; urothelial cancer associated 1

Year:  2018        PMID: 30002691      PMCID: PMC6040126          DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.73713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Sci        ISSN: 1734-1922            Impact factor:   3.318


Introduction

Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is one of the most serious malignant tumors of the digestive system. The morbidity rate of EC ranks eighth and the mortality rate ranks sixth among malignant tumors worldwide [1, 2]. Two histologic types are typical among EC patients: esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients in Western countries predominantly develop EAC, while Chinese patients typically develop ESCC. About 50% of ESCCs are formed in the middle esophagus [3]. Surgical removal is currently the most common treatment for ESCC, but the prognosis after a radical operation is less than ideal. According to recent studies, surgical treatment only gives ESCC patients at stages IIA–III a 5-year survival rate of 20–34% and fails to effectively eliminate distal metastasis and local tumor recurrence [4]. Currently, the TNM classification of malignant tumors serves as the primary basis for determining ESCC prognosis. The lack of objective quantitative indicators to accurately predict prognosis lends itself to opportunities for improvement [5]. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) have emerged as influential factors in the occurrence and development of tumors. LncRNAs are more than 200 nucleotides in length and in most cases are produced by RNA polymerase II and undergo post-transcriptional modifications, such as capping and intron splicing. LncRNA genes usually contain few introns and have low levels of transcription, low conservation among different species, and in most cases have spatiotemporal expression specificity [6, 7]. Although this type of RNA does not have protein-encoding function, it can regulate gene expression at the chromosome, chromatin, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional levels and exerts significant regulatory effects through, inter alia, genomic imprinting, cell differentiation, immune reactions, tumor occurrence, and embryonic stem cell multi-potency. Recent studies have shown that multiple lncRNAs can produce small molecular peptides through transcription to become the driving force for the generation of new proteins [8-10]. In multiple large-scale screening studies, the expression of over 100 lncRNAs in ESCC tissues has been found to be altered. The abnormal expression of lncRNAs is mostly present during the evolution of highly differentiated intraepithelial neoplasia into invasive carcinoma, reflecting the important role of lncRNA in the development of ESCC [11-13]. Two genes known to encode lncRNAs are urothelial cancer associated 1 (UCA1) and metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1). Li et al. reported that the relative level of UCA1 was significantly higher in ESCC tissues compared to the adjacent non-tumor tissue, and remarkably higher expression of UCA1 was found in esophageal cancer cell lines compared with the immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line NE1 [14], and it was found to be deregulated in cisplatin-resistant cells compared with their parent cells [15]. MALAT1 was over-expressed in 46.3% of ESCC tissues. The enhanced MALAT1 expression levels were positively correlated with clinical stages, primary tumor size, and lymph node metastasis, and inhibition of MALAT1 suppressed tumor proliferation in vitro and in vivo, as well as the migratory and invasive capacity [16]. Furthermore, silencing of MALAT1 could significantly suppress the proliferation of ESCC cells through the arrest of the G2/M cell cycle, which may be due to MALAT1-mediated up-regulation of p21 and p27 expression and the inhibition of B-MYB expression [17]. Recently, animal experiments showed that knockdown of MALAT1 decreased tumor formation and improved survival [18]. Here, we describe the relationship between the expression of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs in ESCC tissues and the associated prognosis.

Material and methods

Tissues samples

The tumor tissues and para-carcinoma tissues were taken from 100 ESCC patients who were admitted to the First Hospital of Yulin City between January 2007 and January 2014 and treated as participants of this case-control prospective study. The adjacent carcinoma tissues had been obtained at least 5 cm away from the tumor. Patients were diagnosed with ESCC based on a postoperative pathological examination. Clinical characteristics of participants are shown in Table I. Patients were monitored after surgery by telephone follow-up or visits to the patient’s home, and the total survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) status was observed, with OS representing the time from surgery to death or the last follow-up visit and DFS representing the time from the surgery to the local recurrence, distal metastasis, or the last follow-up visit. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Yulin City, and informed consent was given by all participants.
Table I

Clinical characteristics of study participants

CharacteristicsNumber of casesPercentage
Gender:
 Male7575.0
 Female2525.0
Age [years]:
 ≤ 606868.0
 > 603232.0
Histological grade:
 1–24141.0
 3–45959.0
TNM stage:
 I–II7373.0
 III2727.0
Pathological type:
 Ulcerative carcinoma6565.0
 Others3535.0
Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy:
 Yes5959.0
 No4141.0
Clinical characteristics of study participants

Detection of lncRNAs

Expression levels of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs were detected in the tumor tissues and para-carcinoma tissues as follows: total RNA was extracted by RNAiso Plus (code no. 9108Q; TaKaRa Biotechnology Limited Company, Dalian, China), the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (code no. RR037A, TaKaRa Bio.) was used to transcribe and synthesize cDNA, and real-time quantitative PCR (q-RT PCR) was used to quantify target lncRNA with 18S as the internal reference. The primer sequences are shown in Table II. The total reaction volume was 10 μl, including of 5 μl of SYBR Green I Master Mix, 1 μl of RNAiso Plus, 0.6 μl of forward primers (10 μmol/l), 0.6 μl of reverse primers (10 μmol/l), 1 μl of cDNA, and 1.8 μl of dH2O deionized water. The reaction conditions were: pre-degeneration at 95ºC for 10 s, 95ºC for 5 s, 60ºC for 5 s, and 72ºC for 31 s, and amplification for 40 cycles. The differences between the target lncRNA cycle threshold values (Ct values) and 18S Ct value were determined (ΔCt) and the 2–ΔΔ method was used to determine the relative expression of target lncRNA. Compared to the mean expression levels in ESCC tissues, the patients were categorized as having high UCA1 expression, low UCA1 expression, high MALAT1 expression, and low MALAT1 expression.
Table II

Primer sequences of target lncRNA

LncRNAsPrimerSequence
UCA1Forward5′-CTCTCCATTGGGTTCACCATTC-3′
Reverse5′-GCGGCAGGTCTTAAGAGATGAG-3′
MALAT1Forward5′-CAGTGGGGAACTCTGACTCG-3′
Reverse5′-GTGCCTGGTGCTCTCTTAC C-3′
18 SForward5′-CAGCCACCCGAGATTGAGCA-3′
Reverse5′-TAGTAGCGACGGGCGGTGTG-3′
Primer sequences of target lncRNA

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software (IBM, Armonk, NY). Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and an independent sample t test was used to compare groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare OS and DFS and the log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance. The Cox risk model was used to analyze factors influencing OS and DFS. A p level < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs are higher in ESCC tissues than in para-carcinoma tissues

The relative expression levels of UCA1 were 0.485 ±0.248 in ESCC tissues and 0.199 ±0.122 in adjacent carcinoma tissues, with a significant difference (t = 10.348, p < 0.05). Similarly, the expression levels of MALAT1 were 3.842 ±0.415 in ESCC tissues and 1.451 ±0.136 in adjacent carcinoma tissues, with a significant difference (t = 54.750, p < 0.05).

UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNA expression is correlated with TNM staging in ESCC tissues

Patients were categorized as having high UCA1 expression (49 cases), low UCA1 expression (51 cases), high MALAT1 expression (50 cases), and low MALAT1 expression (50 cases) compared to the mean expression levels in ESCC tissues. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups and the difference in TNM staging between the high UCA1 expression group and the low UCA1 expression group as well as between the high MALAT1 expression group and the low MALAT1 expression group was statistically significant (χ2 = 12.257, 26.839, p < 0.05). The difference in other clinical characteristics was not found to be statistically significant (Tables III and IV).
Table III

UCA1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues and clinical characteristics

CharacteristicsNumber of casesUCA1 high expression(N = 49)UCA1 low expression(N = 51)χ2P-value
Gender:
 Male7535400.654> 0.05
 Female251411
Age [years]:
 > 606831370.990> 0.05
 < 60321814
Histological grade:
 1–24122190.603> 0.05
 3–4592732
TNM stage:
 I–II73284512.257< 0.05
 III27216
Pathological type:
 Ulcerative carcinoma6533320.233> 0.05
 Others351619
Table IV

MALAT1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues and clinical characteristics

CharacteristicsNumber of casesMALAT1 high expression(N = 50)MALAT1 low expression(N = 50)χ2P-value
Gender:
 Male7539360.480> 0.05
 Female251114
Age [years]:
 > 606836320.735> 0.05
 < 60321418
Histological grade:
 1–24119220.372> 0.05
 3–4593128
TNM stage:
 I–II73254826.839< 0.05
 III27252
Pathological type:
 Ulcerative carcinoma6531340.396> 0.05
 Others351916
UCA1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues and clinical characteristics MALAT1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues and clinical characteristics

UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues is predictive of patient survival

The OS and DFS of patients with high UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNA expression in ESCC tissues were significantly lower than those of patients with low expression levels (χ2 = 4.880, 5.894, 8.635, 8.906, p < 0.05). OS, DFS, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown in Tables V, VI and VII, and the Kaplan-Meier statistical significance analytic curves are shown in Figure 1.
Table V

OS and DFS of ESCC patients

SurvivalEstimateStd. error95% CI
Lower boundUpper bound
OS [month]46.0693.81538.59153.547
DFS [month]43.4573.99635.62551.288
Table VI

OS and DFS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels

GroupsSurvivalEstimateStd. Error95% CI
Lower boundUpper bound
UCA1 high expressionOS53.7545.09643.76663.741
DFS51.6365.40341.04662.225
UCA1 low expressionOS37.5385.36527.02348.052
DFS31.8554.89122.26941.442
Table VII

OS and DFS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels

GroupsSurvivalEstimateStd. error95% CI
Lower boundUpper bound
MALAT1 high expressionOS57.0895.13647.02267.156
DFS54.4405.54043.58265.299
MALAT1 low expressionOS32.9994.76023.67042.329
DFS27.8194.28919.41336.225
Figure 1

A – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients, B – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients, C – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels, D – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels, E – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels, F – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels

OS and DFS of ESCC patients OS and DFS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels OS and DFS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels A – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients, B – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients, C – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels, D – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients with different UCA1 lncRNA expression levels, E – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of OS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels, F – Kaplan-Meier survival curve of DFS of patients with different MALAT1 lncRNA expression levels

Multiple factors influence the survival of ESCC patients

Cox survival models revealed that OS and TNM staging (HR = 2.516) were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with UCA1 lncRNA (HR = 1.638) and MALAT1 LncRNA (HR = 1.553) in ESCC patients. In addition, DFS and TNM staging (HR = 2.881) were also correlated with UCA1 lncRNA (HR = 1.662) and MALAT1 lncRNA (HR = 1.713), as shown in Tables VIII and IX.
Table VIII

Multiple factors influence OS in ESCC patients

Itemβχ2HRp-value
TNM stage (stage III)0.7945.1162.516< 0.05
UCA1 high expression0.4366.0251.638< 0.05
MALAT1 high expression0.2374.9151.553< 0.05
Table IX

Multiple factors influence DFS in ESCC patients

Itemβχ2HRp-value
TNM stage (stage III)0.6624.6282.881< 0.05
UCA1 high expression0.1685.6041.662< 0.05
MALAT1 high expression0.3396.1131.713< 0.05
Multiple factors influence OS in ESCC patients Multiple factors influence DFS in ESCC patients

Discussion

In this study, UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNA in ESCC tissues were found to have increased expression levels compared to adjacent carcinoma tissues and were significantly correlated with TNM staging. The results of this study indicate that the expression levels of these two lncRNAs are up-regulated in ESCC tissues and may play important roles in ESCC pathogenicity. The OS and DFS of patients with high expression of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs in ESCC tissues were found to be significantly lower than those of patients with low expression levels, suggesting that the high expression of these two types of lncRNA played a role in determining OS and DFS. The degree to which UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs changed in ESCC tissues was associated with the progression of the tumors and the patient’s postoperative survival, suggesting that the expression of these lncRNAs might be used as auxiliary indicators to evaluate tumor progression and prognosis. Relevant studies have revealed that UCA1 can promote the expression of WNT6 and inhibit the expression of the p27 gene, and it can influence the stage of tumor cells through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway to exert cancer-promoting effects on proliferation and apoptosis in a variety of cancer types [19, 20]. UCA1 can also regulate the expression of tumor drug resistance genes [21, 22], giving it the ability to enhance the proliferation, infiltration, and migration of ESCC cells and lower the sensitivity to anti-tumor drugs. Our results support previous studies suggesting that measuring UCA1 expression could be a target for the treatment of ESCC and the evaluation of patient condition [23]. MALAT1 can react with multiple proteins in the cell nucleus to influence gene regulation and cancer cell movement capability [24]. Previous studies have found that the inhibition of MALAT1 can up-regulate the expression of caspase-8, caspase-3 and Bax, and down-regulate the expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, all of which were related to the development ESCC [25, 26]. The expression of MALAT1 in ESCC tissues at the middle-advanced stage has been found to be higher than that at the early stage, and the amplitude of the up-regulation is associated with the progression of tumor TNM staging and lymph node metastasis, suggesting that the inhibition of MALAT1 could stagnate the proliferation of ESCC tumor cells [27]. Therefore, abnormal expression of MALAT1 in malignant tumor tissues and its involvement with cell cycle stage make it a potential target for the treatment of ESCC [28]. In conclusion, we found that the expression of UCA1 and MALAT1 lncRNAs is up-regulated in ESCC tissues and that their expression can impact the degree of tumor progression. This in turn impacts patients’ postoperative survival time and can serve as an auxiliary index for predicting the prognosis of ESCC patients. Both lncRNAs are potential targets for ESCC treatments, and future studies will investigate the feasibility of interfering with their expression in a clinical setting.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  27 in total

1.  Microarray expression profile analysis of aberrant long non-coding RNAs in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Juan Yao; Jun-Xing Huang; Mei Lin; Zheng-Dong Wu; Hong Yu; Peng-Cheng Wang; Jun Ye; Ping Chen; Jing Wu; Guo-Jun Zhao
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  Comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival between eastern and western population with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Yizhou Jiang; Chunxiao Wu; Shuang Cai; Rui Wang; Ying Zhen; Sufeng Chen; Kuaile Zhao; Yangle Huang; James Luketich; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  The long noncoding MALAT-1 RNA indicates a poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer and induces migration and tumor growth.

Authors:  Lars Henning Schmidt; Tilmann Spieker; Steffen Koschmieder; Sonja Schäffers; Julia Humberg; Dominik Jungen; Etmar Bulk; Antje Hascher; Danielle Wittmer; Alessandro Marra; Ludger Hillejan; Karsten Wiebe; Wolfgang E Berdel; Rainer Wiewrodt; Carsten Muller-Tidow
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Overexpression of long non-coding RNA UCA1 predicts a poor prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Yuan Li; Xin Ma; Can-Bin Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 5.  Functional interactions among microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs.

Authors:  Je-Hyun Yoon; Kotb Abdelmohsen; Myriam Gorospe
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 6.  RNA in unexpected places: long non-coding RNA functions in diverse cellular contexts.

Authors:  Sarah Geisler; Jeff Coller
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 7.  The hallmarks of cancer: a long non-coding RNA point of view.

Authors:  Tony Gutschner; Sven Diederichs
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Long non-coding RNA UCA1 promotes breast tumor growth by suppression of p27 (Kip1).

Authors:  J Huang; N Zhou; K Watabe; Z Lu; F Wu; M Xu; Y-Y Mo
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  Preliminary treatment results of proton beam therapy with chemoradiotherapy for stage I-III esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Akinori Takada; Tatsuya Nakamura; Kanako Takayama; Chiyoko Makita; Motohisa Suzuki; Yusuke Azami; Takahiro Kato; Iwao Tsukiyama; Masato Hareyama; Yasuhiro Kikuchi; Takashi Daimon; Yutaka Toyomasu; Noriko Ii; Yoshihito Nomoto; Hajime Sakuma; Nobukazu Fuwa
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Whole-Genome Sequencing Reveals Diverse Models of Structural Variations in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Caixia Cheng; Yong Zhou; Hongyi Li; Teng Xiong; Shuaicheng Li; Yanghui Bi; Pengzhou Kong; Fang Wang; Heyang Cui; Yaoping Li; Xiaodong Fang; Ting Yan; Yike Li; Juan Wang; Bin Yang; Ling Zhang; Zhiwu Jia; Bin Song; Xiaoling Hu; Jie Yang; Haile Qiu; Gehong Zhang; Jing Liu; Enwei Xu; Ruyi Shi; Yanyan Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Chanting He; Zhenxiang Zhao; Yu Qian; Ruizhou Rong; Zhiwei Han; Yanlin Zhang; Wen Luo; Jiaqian Wang; Shaoliang Peng; Xukui Yang; Xiangchun Li; Lin Li; Hu Fang; Xingmin Liu; Li Ma; Yunqing Chen; Shiping Guo; Xing Chen; Yanfeng Xi; Guodong Li; Jianfang Liang; Xiaofeng Yang; Jiansheng Guo; JunMei Jia; Qingshan Li; Xiaolong Cheng; Qimin Zhan; Yongping Cui
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  18 in total

1.  Hypermethylation-mediated inactivation of miR-124 predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor growth at least partially through targeting EZH2/H3K27me3 in ESCC.

Authors:  Ziqiang Tian; Zhenhua Li; Yonggang Zhu; Lingjiao Meng; Fei Liu; Meixiang Sang; Guiying Wang
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  The emerging role of noncoding RNAs in colorectal cancer chemoresistance.

Authors:  Ling Wei; Xingwu Wang; Liyan Lv; Yan Zheng; Nasha Zhang; Ming Yang
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 6.730

3.  Long non-coding RNA SNHG4 promotes cervical cancer progression through regulating c-Met via targeting miR-148a-3p.

Authors:  Hanchen Li; Jiang Hong; Walimuni Sandaroo Mendis Abeysekara Wijayakulathilaka
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Prognostic nomogram integrated baseline serum lipids for patients with non-esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shulin Chen; Xiaohui Li; Xiaoyan Wen; Songguo Peng; Ning Xue; Shan Xing; Yijun Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 5.  Involvement of long non-coding RNAs in the progression of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Wenhua Xue; Yuanyuan Zheng; Zhibo Shen; Lifeng Li; Zhirui Fan; Wenbin Wang; Zijia Zhu; Yunkai Zhai; Jie Zhao; Quancheng Kan
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Genome-wide identification of a competing endogenous RNA network in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ganxun Li; Tongtong Liu; Bixiang Zhang; Weixun Chen; Zeyang Ding
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.429

7.  Integrated analysis of lncRNA, miRNA and mRNA expression profiling in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Qin Zhang; Yan Liang; Hui Yuan; Si Li; Jie-Bing Wang; Xiao-Mei Li; Jin-Hui Tao; Hai-Feng Pan; Dong-Qing Ye
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  MicroRNA-331-3p inhibits proliferation and metastasis of ovarian cancer by targeting RCC2.

Authors:  Gulimire Buranjiang; Reziya Kuerban; Ailikemu Abuduwanke; Xiaowen Li; Gulina Kuerban
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Unexplained anemia in the elderly - a real life analysis of 981 patients.

Authors:  Sylwia S Michalak; Joanna Rupa-Matysek; Iwona Hus; Lidia Gil
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 10.  Emerging Role of Non-Coding RNAs in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Qingqing Feng; Hongli Zhang; Denglin Yao; Wei-Dong Chen; Yan-Dong Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.