Literature DB >> 30002566

A dynamic threshold model for terminal investment.

Kristin R Duffield1, E Keith Bowers2, Scott K Sakaluk1, Ben M Sadd1.   

Abstract

Although reproductive strategies can be influenced by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors, life history theory provides a rigorous framework for explaining variation in reproductive effort. The terminal investment hypothesis proposes that a decreased expectation of future reproduction (as might arise from a mortality threat) should precipitate increased investment in current reproduction. Terminal investment has been widely studied, and a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic cues that elicit such a response have been identified across an array of taxa. Although terminal investment is often treated as a static strategy, the level at which a cue of decreased future reproduction is sufficient to trigger increased current reproductive effort (i.e., the terminal investment threshold) may depend on context, including the internal state of the organism or its current external environment, independent of the cue that triggers a shift in reproductive investment. Here, we review empirical studies that address the terminal investment hypothesis, exploring both the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that mediate its expression. Based on these studies, we propose a novel framework within which to view the strategy of terminal investment, incorporating factors that influence an individual's residual reproductive value beyond a terminal investment trigger - the dynamic terminal investment threshold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Residual reproductive value; condition-dependent reproductive investment; fecundity compensation; life history evolution; phenotypic plasticity

Year:  2017        PMID: 30002566      PMCID: PMC6039117          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2416-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  91 in total

1.  Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort.

Authors:  M F Hirshfield; D W Tinkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Coevolution between parasite virulence and host life-history traits.

Authors:  Sylvain Gandon; Philip Agnew; Yannis Michalakis
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Condition-dependent reproductive effort in frogs infected by a widespread pathogen.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Roznik; Sarah J Sapsford; David A Pike; Lin Schwarzkopf; Ross A Alford
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Terminal investment and senescence in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on Cayo Santiago.

Authors:  Christy L Hoffman; James P Higham; Adaris Mas-Rivera; James E Ayala; Dario Maestripieri
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Immune activation generates corticosterone-mediated terminal reproductive investment in a wild bird.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Rachel M Bowden; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  The cost of reproduction-a physiological approach.

Authors:  P Calow
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1979-02

7.  A parasite-mediated life-history shift in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  William Chadwick; Tom J Little
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Role of the integument in insect immunity: epicuticular abrasion and induction of cecropin synthesis in cuticular epithelial cells.

Authors:  P T Brey; W J Lee; M Yamakawa; Y Koizumi; S Perrot; M François; M Ashida
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Female red squirrels fit Williams' hypothesis of increasing reproductive effort with increasing age.

Authors:  Sébastien Descamps; Stan Boutin; Dominique Berteaux; Jean-Michel Gaillard
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Amphibians with infectious disease increase their reproductive effort: evidence for the terminal investment hypothesis.

Authors:  Laura A Brannelly; Rebecca Webb; Lee F Skerratt; Lee Berger
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.411

View more
  20 in total

1.  Meta-analysis reveals that animal sexual signalling behaviour is honest and resource based.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Large-scale disease patterns explained by climatic seasonality and host traits.

Authors:  Antoine Filion; Alan Eriksson; Fátima Jorge; Chris N Niebuhr; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Chronic immune challenge is detrimental to female survival, feeding behavior, and reproduction in the field cricket Gryllus assimilis (Fabricius, 1775).

Authors:  Guilherme Martins Limberger; Kathellen Pintado Esteves; Lamia Marques Halal; Luiz Eduardo Maia Nery; Duane Barros da Fonseca
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Parasite-induced plasticity in host social behaviour depends on sex and susceptibility.

Authors:  Jessica F Stephenson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Pre- and postnatal effects of experimentally manipulated maternal corticosterone on growth, stress reactivity and survival of nestling house wrens.

Authors:  Beth M Weber; E Keith Bowers; Kimberly A Terrell; Josephine F Falcone; Charles F Thompson; Scott K Sakaluk
Journal:  Funct Ecol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.608

6.  Testing the multiple stressor hypothesis: chlorothalonil exposure alters transmission potential of a bumblebee pathogen but not individual host health.

Authors:  Austin C Calhoun; Audrey E Harrod; Toby A Bassingthwaite; Ben M Sadd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adaptive plasticity in the gametocyte conversion rate of malaria parasites.

Authors:  Petra Schneider; Megan A Greischar; Philip L G Birget; Charlotte Repton; Nicole Mideo; Sarah E Reece
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Navigating infection risk during oviposition and cannibalistic foraging in a holometabolous insect.

Authors:  Jonathon A Siva-Jothy; Katy M Monteith; Pedro F Vale
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Immunity for nothing and the eggs for free: Apparent lack of both physiological trade-offs and terminal reproductive investment in female crickets (Gryllus texensis).

Authors:  Atsushi Miyashita; Ting Yat Marco Lee; Laura E McMillan; Russell Easy; Shelley A Adamo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Voles and weasels in the boreal Fennoscandian small mammal community: what happens if the least weasel disappears due to climate change?

Authors:  Hannu Ylönen; Marko Haapakoski; Thorbjörn Sievert; Janne Sundell
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.