| Literature DB >> 30002358 |
Melisa Acosta-Coll1,2, Francisco Ballester-Merelo3, Marcos Martinez-Peiró4, Emiro De la Hoz-Franco5.
Abstract
Pluvial flash floods in urban areas are becoming increasingly frequent due to climate change and human actions, negatively impacting the life, work, production and infrastructure of a population. Pluvial flooding occurs when intense rainfall overflows the limits of urban drainage and water accumulation causes hazardous flash floods. Although flash floods are hard to predict given their rapid formation, Early Warning Systems (EWS) are used to minimize casualties. We performed a systematic review to define the basic structure of an EWS for rain flash floods. The structure of the review is as follows: first, Section 2 describes the most important factors that affect the intensity of pluvial flash floods during rainfall events. Section 3 defines the key elements and actors involved in an effective EWS. Section 4 reviews different EWS architectures for pluvial flash floods implemented worldwide. It was identified that the reviewed projects did not follow guidelines to design early warning systems, neglecting important aspects that must be taken into account in their implementation. Therefore, this manuscript proposes a basic structure for an effective EWS for pluvial flash floods that guarantees the forecasting process and alerts dissemination during rainfall events.Entities:
Keywords: early warning system; flash floods; flood risk assessment; pluvial flooding; real-time; urban drainage
Year: 2018 PMID: 30002358 PMCID: PMC6068664 DOI: 10.3390/s18072255
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Pluvial flood impact in European cities [20].
Preference of information sources during a disaster.
| Source | Population Surveyed |
|---|---|
| Television | 52% |
| 18.9% | |
| 9.6% | |
| Radio | 8.2% |
| News Agency Websites | 6.1% |
| Government Websites | 2.9% |
Summary of respondents’ descriptions of actions that a person should take in response to a flash flood warning [67].
| Action | % of Respondents | Example Public Response (s) |
|---|---|---|
| Move to a higher location | 84% | “Climb to safety” |
| “Run to higher ground” | ||
| “Get to higher ground and hold on” | ||
| “Climb a tree...” | ||
| “Get to a multilevel building and get to the top” | ||
| “Drive uphill, get out of the car and continue uphill on foot” | ||
| “Get as high as possible” | ||
| Move to a different location | 18% | “Drive to flatland, away from Boulder Creek away from mountains and to higher land” |
| “Run like nuts” | ||
| “Get to nearest safety shelter, hospital, firehouse” | ||
| Avoid risky areas | 12% | “Stay away from creeks + rivers” |
| “Move away from creek areas” | ||
| “Find higher ground away from electric lines” | ||
| Go inside | 10% | “Get inside a strong building” |
| “Go in a commercial building or knock on a door” | ||
| Assess situation | 4% | “Think! Assess the vulnerability of location and act accordingly...” |
| “Determine if the flood will be in your area and take appropriate action” | ||
| “Have high ground picked out nearby and go to it if you see the water and debris coming” | ||
| Be alert | 3% | “Raise alert level and make a plan for possible action” |
| “Be aware of nearby floodways/drainages” | ||
| Seek more information | 1% | “Try to obtain more info about where to go for safety |
| Depends | 7% | “Go to a higher place or leave the area if there is time” |
| “It depends on where you are?” | ||
| Don’t know | 1% | “Honestly, I have no idea” |
| Other | 8% | “Check to hear if it is a practice warning or a real one—then call loved ones and go to a safe location” |
| “Call for help and look for high ground” |
Key elements and Key actors of an Early Warning System [55].
| Key Element | Key Actors |
|---|---|
| Disaster risk knowledge | 1. International, national and local disaster management agencies. |
| 2. Meteorological and hydrological organizations. | |
| 3. Geophysical experts | |
| 4. Social scientists | |
| 5. Engineers | |
| 6. Land use and urban planners | |
| 7. Researchers and academics | |
| 8. Organizations and community representatives involved in disaster management | |
| Forecasting | 1. National meteorological and hydrological services |
| 2. Specialized observatory and warning centres | |
| 3. Universities and research institutes | |
| 4. Private sector equipment supplier telecommunications authorities | |
| 5. Quality management experts | |
| 6. Regional technical centres | |
| Dissemination and communication | 1. International, national and local disaster management agencies |
| 2. National meteorological and hydrological services | |
| 3. Military and civil authorities | |
| 4. Media organizations (print, television, radio and online) | |
| 4. Businesses in vulnerable sectors (e.g., tourism, aged care facilities, marine vessels) | |
| 5. Community-based and grassroots organizations | |
| 6. International and local agencies | |
| Preparedness and response | 1. Community-based and grassroots organizations |
| 2. Schools, universities and informal education sector. | |
| 3. Media (print, radio, television, online) | |
| 4. Technical agencies with specialized knowledge of hazards | |
| 5. International, national and local disaster management agencies |
Figure 2General structure of motes-based sensor network for the Florida (United States) project.
Figure 3Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) architecture in the Barranquilla (Colombia) project.
Figure 4Urban Flood Monitoring System for Manila (Philippines) Metro project.
Figure 5Wireless flood monitoring system implemented in the Nakhon Si Thammarat project [77].
Instruments, communication protocols and methods for alert dissemination.
| Location | Sensors | Communication System | Alert Dissemination | Power Supply | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Variables to Measure | ||||
| Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand | STARLFLOW Ultrasonic Doppler sensor | Water level and velocity | GPRS module | Web application. SMS, FAX, email. | Connected to the electrical grid and UPS |
| Tipping bucket rain gauge | Amount of rain | ||||
| Florida, United States | Ultrasonic sensor WL700 | Water level | Wireless unit (IEEE 802.15) | Online access to raw and predicted data, video information | Photovoltaic system |
| Redeye Z205 Cameras | Ethernet | ||||
| Barranquilla, Colombia | Humidity sensor | Atmospheric variables | ZigBee (IEEE 802.15) | Web and mobile application | Photovoltaic system |
| Temperature sensor | |||||
| Atmospheric pressure | |||||
| Manila, Philippines | Pressure sensor | Water level | GPRS module | Web application | Photovoltaic system |
| Tipping bucket rain gauge | Amount of rain | ||||
| Mayagüez, Puerto Rico | Weather radar | Radar reflectivity and amount of rain | Parabolic antenna (IEEE 802.15) | Web application | Photovoltaic system |
| Barcelona, Spain | Weather radar | Radar reflectivity and amount of rain | Web application, SMS, E-mail | ||
Differences between wireless communication protocols.
| Protocols | Bluetooth | Ultrawide Band (UWB) | ZigBee/IP | Wi-Fi | Wi-Max | GSM/GPRS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.4 GHz | 3.1–10.6 GHz | 868/915 MHz; 2.4 GHz | 2.4; 5 GHz | 2.4; 5.1–66 GHz | 850/900; 1800/1900 MHz |
|
| 10 m | 10–102 m | 10–1000 m | 10–100 m | 0.3–49 km | 2–35 km |
|
| 0.72 | 110 | 0.25 | 54 | 70 | 0.168 |
|
| 1.39 | 0.009 | 4 | 0.0185 | 0.0143 | 5.95 |
|
| 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.0063 | 1 | 0.25 | 2 |
Figure 6Consolidated forecasting process structure with main and complementary elements.
Figure 7Main and complementary media used in reviewed projects for alert dissemination.
Figure 8Key elements of the proposed pluvial flash flood early warning system.
Figure 9Monitoring, Communication and Power supply system of an EWS for urban flash floods in Barranquilla (Colombia)
Figure 10Web application (http: //www.isatbaq.com.co).