J Craig Garrison1, Joseph Hannon2, Shiho Goto2, Laura Giesler3, Curtis Bush4, James M Bothwell5. 1. Texas Health Sports Medicine, 800 5th Ave. Suite 150, Fort Worth, TX 76104, United States of America. Electronic address: CraigGarrison@TexasHealth.org. 2. Texas Health Sports Medicine Southwest, 6301 Harris Pkwy. Suite 150, Fort Worth, TX 76132, United States of America. 3. Texas Health Sports Medicine, 800 5th Ave. Suite 150, Fort Worth, TX 76104, United States of America. 4. Orthopedic Specialty Associates, 800 5th Ave, Suite 500, Fort Worth, TX 76104, United States of America. 5. Fort Worth Orthopedics, 6301 Harris Pkwy. Suite 200, Fort Worth, TX 76132, United States of America.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare hip and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a double limb squat (DLS) and quadriceps strength in patients three months post-operative ACL-R versus matched healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-four ACL-R participants (Age = 15.5 ± 1.3 yrs; Ht = 1.66 ± .07 m; Mass = 66.3 ± 15.5 kg) were compared to 24 age, sex, limb, and activity-matched healthy controls (Age = 15.5 ± 1.2 yrs; Ht = 1.65 ± .08 m; Mass = 59.0 ± 9.8 kg). Lower extremity biomechanical data was collected at three months post-operative ACL-R during five consecutive DLS. EAC was calculated during DLS descent. Isokinetic quadriceps strength was collected at 60°/s. Normalized quadriceps peak torque (QUADS) was averaged across five trials. Independent t-tests examined differences in group hip and knee EAC during each task. Separate Pearson product-moment correlations examined the relationship between QUADS and hip and knee EAC during the DLS. RESULTS: ACL-R demonstrated greater injured limb hip EAC (46.4 ± 16.0) than Healthy (31.7 ± 11.0) during a DLS (p = 0.001). ACL-R demonstrated less injured limb knee EAC (42.7 ± 14.6) than Healthy (60.6 ± 8.9) during DLS (p < 0.001). No differences were seen between uninjured limb hip (ACL-R = 0.0 ± 14.2; Healthy = 33.4 ± 9.1, p = 0.629) or knee (ACL-R = 56.9 ± 15.6; Healthy = 59.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.561) EAC and matched limbs. ACL-R injured limb QUADS was decreased compared to Healthy (ACL-R = 1.1 ± 0.5; Healthy = 2.0 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). No differences were seen in QUADS on the uninjured and matched limbs (ACL-R = 2.0 ± 0.6; Healthy = 1.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.894). There was a weak, negative correlation between injured limb QUADS and hip EAC (r = -0.471, p = 0.001) and moderate, positive correlation between injured limb QUADS and knee EAC (r = 0.615, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACL-R participants demonstrate different eccentric loading strategies during a DLS at three months postoperative compared to matched healthy controls.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare hip and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a double limb squat (DLS) and quadriceps strength in patients three months post-operative ACL-R versus matched healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty-four ACL-R participants (Age = 15.5 ± 1.3 yrs; Ht = 1.66 ± .07 m; Mass = 66.3 ± 15.5 kg) were compared to 24 age, sex, limb, and activity-matched healthy controls (Age = 15.5 ± 1.2 yrs; Ht = 1.65 ± .08 m; Mass = 59.0 ± 9.8 kg). Lower extremity biomechanical data was collected at three months post-operative ACL-R during five consecutive DLS. EAC was calculated during DLS descent. Isokinetic quadriceps strength was collected at 60°/s. Normalized quadriceps peak torque (QUADS) was averaged across five trials. Independent t-tests examined differences in group hip and knee EAC during each task. Separate Pearson product-moment correlations examined the relationship between QUADS and hip and knee EAC during the DLS. RESULTS: ACL-R demonstrated greater injured limb hip EAC (46.4 ± 16.0) than Healthy (31.7 ± 11.0) during a DLS (p = 0.001). ACL-R demonstrated less injured limb knee EAC (42.7 ± 14.6) than Healthy (60.6 ± 8.9) during DLS (p < 0.001). No differences were seen between uninjured limb hip (ACL-R = 0.0 ± 14.2; Healthy = 33.4 ± 9.1, p = 0.629) or knee (ACL-R = 56.9 ± 15.6; Healthy = 59.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.561) EAC and matched limbs. ACL-R injured limb QUADS was decreased compared to Healthy (ACL-R = 1.1 ± 0.5; Healthy = 2.0 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). No differences were seen in QUADS on the uninjured and matched limbs (ACL-R = 2.0 ± 0.6; Healthy = 1.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.894). There was a weak, negative correlation between injured limb QUADS and hip EAC (r = -0.471, p = 0.001) and moderate, positive correlation between injured limb QUADS and knee EAC (r = 0.615, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ACL-R participants demonstrate different eccentric loading strategies during a DLS at three months postoperative compared to matched healthy controls.
Authors: J Craig Garrison; Joseph Hannon; Shiho Goto; Victor Kosmopoulos; Subhash Aryal; Curtis Bush; James M Bothwell; Steven B Singleton Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-10-04