| Literature DB >> 30001568 |
Peter Kozlowski1, Tilo Burkhardt2, Ulrich Gembruch3, Markus Gonser4, Christiane Kähler5, Karl-Oliver Kagan6, Constantin von Kaisenberg7, Philipp Klaritsch8, Eberhard Merz9, Horst Steiner10, Sevgi Tercanli11, Klaus Vetter12, Thomas Schramm13.
Abstract
First-trimester screening between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks with qualified prenatal counseling, detailed ultrasound, biochemical markers and maternal factors has become the basis for decisions about further examinations. It detects numerous structural and genetic anomalies. The inclusion of uterine artery Doppler and PlGF screens for preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. Low-dose aspirin significantly reduces the prevalence of severe preterm eclampsia. Cut-off values define groups of high, intermediate and low probability. Prenatal counseling uses detection and false-positive rates to work out the individual need profile and the corresponding decision: no further diagnosis/screening - cell-free DNA screening - diagnostic procedure and genetic analysis. In pre-test counseling it must be recognized that the prevalence of trisomy 21, 18 or 13 is low in younger women, as in submicroscopic anomalies in every maternal age. Even with high specificities, the positive predictive values of screening tests for rare anomalies are low. In the general population trisomies and sex chromosome aneuploidies account for approximately 70 % of anomalies recognizable by conventional genetic analysis. Screen positive results of cfDNA tests have to be proven by diagnostic procedure and genetic diagnosis. In cases of inconclusive results a higher rate of genetic anomalies is detected. Procedure-related fetal loss rates after chorionic biopsy and amniocentesis performed by experts are lower than 1 to 2 in 1000. Counseling should include the possible detection of submicroscopic anomalies by comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). At present, existing studies about screening for microdeletions and duplications do not provide reliable data to calculate sensitivities, false-positive rates and positive predictive values. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30001568 DOI: 10.1055/a-0631-8898
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultraschall Med ISSN: 0172-4614 Impact factor: 6.548