Literature DB >> 29999497

Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.

Danail Ivanov1, Kristina Bliznakova, Ivan Buliev, Peycho Popov, Giovanni Mettivier, Paolo Russo, Francesca Di Lillo, Antonio Sarno, Janne Vignero, Hilde Bosmans, Alberto Bravin, Zhivko Bliznakov.   

Abstract

Breast physical phantoms are a basic tool for the assessment and verification of performance standards in daily clinical practice of x-ray breast imaging modalities. They are also invaluable in testing and evaluation of new x-ray breast modalities to be potentially established, e.g. breast computed tomography, dual-energy breast CT and phase-contrast mammography and tomography. Nowadays, there is a lack or there are only a limited number of breast physical phantoms available for this purpose. The aim of this study is to explore a range of 3D printing materials such as resins, PLA, ABS, Nylon etc, to determine their attenuation and refractive properties, and to finally compare them to the properties of the breast tissues: adipose, glandular and skin. To achieve this goal, step-wedge phantoms were computationally modeled and then manufactured using stereolithographic and fused-deposition modeling technologies. X-ray images of the phantoms were acquired, using monochromatic beam at ID17, ESRF, Grenoble for three energies-30 keV, 45 keV and 60 keV. Experimental data were further processed to obtain the linear attenuation coefficients of these materials. Comparison with theoretical data for the linear attenuation coefficients and the refractive indexes for breast tissues was performed. From the studied materials, most of the resins, Nylon, Hybrid, PET-G show absorption properties close to the glandular tissue, while ABS shows absorption characteristics close to these of the adipose tissue. For phase-contrast imaging, it turns out that the ABS combined with resin-based materials to represent the adipose and glandular tissues, respectively may be a good combination for manufacturing of a phantom suitable for these studies. These results can be used for the design and the construction of a new physical anthropomorphic phantom of the breast with improved anatomical and radiological characteristics dedicated for advanced mammography imaging techniques implemented at higher photon energies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29999497     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Radiochromic film dosimetry in synchrotron radiation breast computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Giovanni Mettivier; Marica Masi; Fulvia Arfelli; Luca Brombal; Pasquale Delogu; Francesca Di Lillo; Sandro Donato; Christian Fedon; Bruno Golosio; Piernicola Oliva; Luigi Rigon; Antonio Sarno; Angelo Taibi; Paolo Russo
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  Three-dimensionally-printed anthropomorphic physical phantom for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis with custom materials, lesions, and uniform quality control region.

Authors:  Andrea H Rossman; Matthew Catenacci; Christine Zhao; Dhiraj Sikaria; John E Knudsen; Danielle Dawes; Michael E Gehm; Ehsan Samei; Benjamin J Wiley; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-03-22

3.  Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Hernandez; Craig K Abbey; Peymon Ghazi; George Burkett; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An anthropomorphic phantom representing a prematurely born neonate for digital x-ray imaging using 3D printing: Proof of concept and comparison of image quality from different systems.

Authors:  Nikolaus Irnstorfer; Ewald Unger; Azadeh Hojreh; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Rance Tino; Adam Yeo; Martin Leary; Milan Brandt; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

6.  Product Design by Additive Manufacturing for Water Environments: Study of Degradation and Absorption Behavior of PLA and PETG.

Authors:  Daniel Moreno Nieto; María Alonso-García; Miguel-Angel Pardo-Vicente; Lucía Rodríguez-Parada
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Classification of X-Ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials Using Computed Tomography From 70 to 140 kVp.

Authors:  Xiangjie Ma; Martin Buschmann; Ewald Unger; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-29

Review 8.  Low-Cost Cranioplasty-A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine.

Authors:  Wojciech Czyżewski; Jakub Jachimczyk; Zofia Hoffman; Michał Szymoniuk; Jakub Litak; Marcin Maciejewski; Krzysztof Kura; Radosław Rola; Kamil Torres
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.748

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.