Literature DB >> 29999438

Do individual versus illness belief schema differ in the prediction of post-stroke recovery?

Navneet Aujla1, Marion Walker1, Nikola Sprigg1, Kavita Vedhara1.   

Abstract

This longitudinal observational study examined how individual versus illness belief schema compare as predictors of post-stroke recovery. A total of 42 stroke survivors (mean age = 66.9 years/range = 29-96 years; 68% male) were involved. The primary outcome, Health-Related Quality of Life was measured using EQ-5D-5L, mood using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and disability using Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised measured illness beliefs. Linear regressions showed that individual illness beliefs significantly explained more of the variance in 3-month post-stroke recovery than schema (7.4%-22.5% versus 1.9%-9.9%). Individual versus illness belief schema predict outcomes differently, but which approach predicts outcomes better remains unclear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common Sense Model; Health-Related Quality of Life; cluster analysis; disability; illness belief schema; illness beliefs; mood; recovery; stroke

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29999438     DOI: 10.1177/1359105318785446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Psychol        ISSN: 1359-1053


  1 in total

1.  A systematic review of illness representation clusters in chronic conditions.

Authors:  Eleanor Rivera; Colleen Corte; Holli A DeVon; Eileen G Collins; Alana Steffen
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.228

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.