| Literature DB >> 29999438 |
Navneet Aujla1, Marion Walker1, Nikola Sprigg1, Kavita Vedhara1.
Abstract
This longitudinal observational study examined how individual versus illness belief schema compare as predictors of post-stroke recovery. A total of 42 stroke survivors (mean age = 66.9 years/range = 29-96 years; 68% male) were involved. The primary outcome, Health-Related Quality of Life was measured using EQ-5D-5L, mood using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and disability using Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Stroke Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised measured illness beliefs. Linear regressions showed that individual illness beliefs significantly explained more of the variance in 3-month post-stroke recovery than schema (7.4%-22.5% versus 1.9%-9.9%). Individual versus illness belief schema predict outcomes differently, but which approach predicts outcomes better remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Common Sense Model; Health-Related Quality of Life; cluster analysis; disability; illness belief schema; illness beliefs; mood; recovery; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29999438 DOI: 10.1177/1359105318785446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Psychol ISSN: 1359-1053