Literature DB >> 29998592

Mortality, liver transplantation and hepatic complications in patients with treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B treated with entecavir vs tenofovir.

Byung Gyu Kim1, Neung Hwa Park1, Seung Bum Lee1, Hojune Lee1, Byung Uk Lee1, Jae Ho Park1, Seok Won Jung1, In Du Jeong1, Sung-Jo Bang1, Jung Woo Shin1.   

Abstract

Few studies have directly compared the long-term clinical outcomes of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study aimed to compare the risk of mortality, liver transplantation and hepatic complications including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic decompensation between these drugs in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed a longitudinal observational analysis of data from 1325 consecutive adult CHB patients with a cumulative adherence of ≥80% to treatment with ETV (n = 721) or TDF (n = 604) at a tertiary referral hospital in Ulsan, Korea, from 1 January 2007 through 31 April 2017. Among the patients, 708 were analysed using propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1. In the follow-up period of up to 5 years, five patients (0.4%) died, three patients (0.2%) underwent liver transplantation (LT) and 54 patients (4.1%) developed HCC. Hepatic decompensation occurred in 24 (1.8%) patients. ETV therapy did not significantly differ from TDF therapy regarding the risk of liver-related death or LT (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.23-4.07; log-rank P = 0.955), HCC (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.72-2.56; log-rank P = 0.340) and hepatic decompensation (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.67-4.00; log-rank P = 0.276). In the 708 propensity-matched pairs, ETV and TDF were also not significantly different with respect to the risk of mortality, LT and hepatic complications. In this longitudinal observational study of 1325 patients with CHB, ETV and TDF therapies were not significantly different regarding the risk of mortality, HCC, LT and hepatic decompensation.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  entecavir; hepatic decompensation; hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; tenofovir

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998592     DOI: 10.1111/jvh.12971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Viral Hepat        ISSN: 1352-0504            Impact factor:   3.728


  18 in total

1.  Comparable Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Treated with Entecavir or Tenofovir.

Authors:  Jung Woo Shin; Joonho Jeong; Seok Won Jung; Seung Bum Lee; Bo Ryung Park; Min-Ju Kim; Eun Ji Park; Neung Hwa Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  [Antiviral and antifibrotic therapies reduce occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B and liver fibrosis: a 144-week prospective cohort study].

Authors:  Yuchen Zhou; Chengguang Hu; Guosheng Yuan; Junwei Liu; Yanyu Ren; Cuirong Tang; Shuling Yang; Lin Dai; Yuan Li; Dinghua Yang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-06-30

3.  Tenofovir Treatment Has Lower Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma than Entecavir Treatment in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hairong Liu; Yu Shi; John C Hayden; Paul M Ryan; Jamal Rahmani; Guangsheng Yu
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  Efficacy of entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive hepatitis B patients.

Authors:  Hye Yeon Chon; Sang Hoon Ahn; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Dong Hyun Sinn; Seung Up Kim
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Tenofovir is superior to entecavir in reducing HCC for patients with HBV-related compensated cirrhosis at high HCC risk scores.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Lichang Chen; Rui Huang; Chuanwu Zhu; Jia Shang; Yunsong Qian; Jianqi Lian; Longgen Liu; Jianning Jiang; Chenghai Liu; Honglian Gui; Qing Xie
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.970

6.  Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Tenofovir vs Entecavir Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Darren Jun Hao Tan; Cheng Han Ng; Phoebe Wen Lin Tay; Nicholas Syn; Mark D Muthiah; Wen Hui Lim; Ansel Shao Pin Tang; Kai En Lim; Grace En Hui Lim; Nobuharu Tamaki; Beom Kyung Kim; Margaret Li Peng Teng; James Fung; Rohit Loomba; Mindie H Nguyen; Daniel Q Huang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 7.  Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Comparison of the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Antiviral-Naive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Treated with Entecavir versus Tenofovir: The Devil in the Detail.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Oh; Hyo Young Lee; Jihye Kim; Yoon Jun Kim
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Comparative Effectiveness of Entecavir Versus Tenofovir for Preventing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shravan Dave; Sooyoung Park; M Hassan Murad; Abbey Barnard; Larry Prokop; Leon A Adams; Siddharth Singh; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinhui Wang; Xiaoli Liu; Zhibo Dang; Lihua Yu; Yuyong Jiang; Xianbo Wang; Zhiyun Yan
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Comparison of the Efficacy of Entecavir and Tenofovir in Reducing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-Life Study in Turkey.

Authors:  Fatih Güzelbulut; Pınar Gökçen; Güray Can; Gupse Adalı; Ayça Gökçen Değirmenci Saltürk; Ekrem Aslan; Kamil Özdil; Hamdi Levent Doğanay
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.