Literature DB >> 29998407

Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Medicare Patients: Genetic Testing Criteria Miss the Mark.

Shan Yang1, Jennifer E Axilbund1, Erin O'Leary1, Scott T Michalski1, Robbie Evans1, Stephen E Lincoln1, Edward D Esplin2, Robert L Nussbaum1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 5-10% of breast and ovarian cancers are due to hereditary causes such as hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome. Medicare, the third-party payer that covers 44 million patients in the United States, has implemented a set of clinical criteria to determine coverage for the testing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These criteria, developed to identify carriers of BRCA1/2 variants, have not been evaluated in the panel testing era. This study investigated a series of Medicare patients undergoing genetic testing for HBOC to determine the efficacy of genetic testing criteria in identifying patients with hereditary risk.
METHODS: This study retrospectively examined de-identified data from a consecutive series of Medicare patients undergoing genetic testing based on personal and family history of breast and gynecologic cancer. Ordering clinicians indicated whether patients did or did not meet established criteria for BRCA1/2 genetic testing. The genetic test results were compared between the group that met the criteria and the group that did not. Patients in families with known pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants were excluded from the primary analysis.
RESULTS: Among 4196 unique Medicare patients, the rate of P/LP variants for the patients who met the criteria for genetic testing was 10.5%, and for those who did not, the rate was 9% (p = 0.26).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that a substantial number of Medicare patients with clinically actionable genetic variants are being missed by current testing criteria and suggest the need for significant expansion and simplification of the testing criteria for HBOC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998407     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6621-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  24 in total

Review 1.  Genetic cancer predisposition syndromes among older adults.

Authors:  Yanin Chavarri-Guerra; Thomas P Slavin; Ossian Longoria-Lozano; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  BRCA testing in unaffected young women in the United States, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Fangjian Guo; Matthew Scholl; Erika L Fuchs; Abbey B Berenson; Yong-Fang Kuo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Haimiao Yuan; Junlin Liao; Pamela Imperiale; Krysten Shipley; Lillian M Erdahl; Sonia L Sugg; Ronald J Weigel; Ingrid M Lizarraga
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The genetics of hereditary cancer risk syndromes in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis of 1682 patients.

Authors:  Jarbas Maciel de Oliveira; Nuria Bengala Zurro; Antonio Victor Campos Coelho; Marcel Pinheiro Caraciolo; Rodrigo Bertollo de Alexandre; Murilo Castro Cervato; Renata Moldenhauer Minillo; George de Vasconcelos Carvalho Neto; Ivana Grivicich; João Bosco Oliveira
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.351

5.  Predominance of BRCA2 Mutation and Estrogen Receptor Positivity in Unselected Breast Cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation.

Authors:  Pascal Pujol; Kevin Yauy; Amandine Coffy; Nicolas Duforet-Frebourg; Sana Gabteni; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Frédérique Penault Llorca; Frédéric Thomas; Kevin Hughes; Clare Turnbull; Virginie Galibert; Chloé Rideau; Carole Corsini; Laetitia Collet; Benoit You; David Geneviève; Nicolas Philippe
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  The role of genomics in global cancer prevention.

Authors:  Ophira Ginsburg; Paul Brennan; Patricia Ashton-Prolla; Anna Cantor; Daniela Mariosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Identification of women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in a sample of 1000 Slovenian women: a comparison of guidelines.

Authors:  Urska Kotnik; Borut Peterlin; Luca Lovrecic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Understanding the Clinical Implications of Low Penetrant Genes and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Anusha Vaidyanathan; Virginia Kaklamani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 9.  Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore-the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Felipe Batalini; Ellie G Peacock; Lindsey Stobie; Alison Robertson; Judy Garber; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Nadine M Tung
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Impact of changing guidelines on genetic testing and surveillance recommendations in a contemporary cohort of breast cancer survivors with family history of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Annie Wang; Jessica N Everett; Jennifer Chun; Cindy Cen; Diane M Simeone; Freya Schnabel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.