Literature DB >> 29998344

Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment With the Ankle-Brachial Index: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Susan J Curry1, Alex H Krist2,3, Douglas K Owens4,5, Michael J Barry6, Aaron B Caughey7, Karina W Davidson8, Chyke A Doubeni9, John W Epling10, Alex R Kemper11, Martha Kubik12, C Seth Landefeld13, Carol M Mangione14, Michael Silverstein15, Melissa A Simon16, Chien-Wen Tseng17,18, John B Wong19.   

Abstract

Importance: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a manifestation of atherosclerosis in the lower limbs. It can impair walking and, in severe cases, can lead to tissue loss, infection, and amputation. In addition to morbidity directly caused by PAD, patients with PAD are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, because atherosclerosis is a systemic disease that also causes coronary and cerebrovascular events. Objective: To update the 2013 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on screening for PAD and CVD risk with the ankle-brachial index (ABI). Evidence Review: The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on whether screening for PAD with the ABI in generally asymptomatic adults reduces morbidity or mortality from PAD or CVD. The current review expanded on the previous review to include individuals with diabetes and interventions that include supervised exercise and physical therapy intended to improve outcomes in the lower limbs. Findings: The USPSTF found few data on the accuracy of the ABI for identifying asymptomatic persons who can benefit from treatment of PAD or CVD. There are few studies addressing the benefits of treating screen-detected patients with PAD; 2 good-quality studies showed no benefit of using the ABI to manage daily aspirin therapy in unselected populations, and 2 studies showed no benefit from exercise therapy. No studies addressed the harms of screening, although the potential exists for overdiagnosis, labeling, and opportunity costs. Studies that addressed the harms of treatment showed nonsignificant results. Therefore, the USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient and that the balance of benefits and harms of screening for PAD with the ABI in asymptomatic adults cannot be determined. Conclusions and Recommendation: The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for PAD and CVD risk with the ABI in asymptomatic adults. (I statement).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29998344     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.8357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  19 in total

Review 1.  Radial Access for Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Interventions: Do We Have the Tools?

Authors:  Raghuram Posham; Lindsay B Young; Robert A Lookstein; Constantino Pena; Rahul S Patel; Aaron M Fischman
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  Intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Ran Meng; Gang Liu; Catherine Cao; Fenghua Chen; Kunlin Jin; Xunming Ji; Guodong Cao
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI) predict health care costs and utilization in older men, independent of prevalent clinical cardiovascular disease and each other.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Tien N Vo; Lisa Langsetmo; Selcuk Adabag; Pawel Szulc; Joshua R Lewis; Allyson M Kats; Brent C Taylor; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 5.162

4.  Sex Differences in Endovascular Treatment of Isolated Popliteal Lesions.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Giovanni B Torsello; Sarah Litterscheid; Raffaella Berchiolli; Nicola Troisi; Giovanni Federico Torsello
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 5.  Sex Differences in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Maria Pabon; Susan Cheng; S Elissa Altin; Sanjum S Sethi; Michael D Nelson; Kerrie L Moreau; Naomi Hamburg; Connie N Hess
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 23.213

6.  Burden of Peripheral Artery Disease on Mortality and Incident Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Jonathan T Unkart; Matthew A Allison; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Joachim H Ix; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Race and socioeconomic differences associated with endovascular peripheral vascular interventions for newly diagnosed claudication.

Authors:  Caitlin W Hicks; Peiqi Wang; William E Bruhn; Christopher J Abularrage; Ying W Lum; Bruce A Perler; James H Black; Martin A Makary
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Give a Leg Up: Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yasutomi Higashikuni; Wenhao Liu; Masataka Sata
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.394

9.  Association of severity of coronary artery disease by SYNTAX score (SS) and lower extremity arterial disease by duplex ultrasound (DUS) study-an Indian perspective.

Authors:  Saumen Nandi; Anindya Mukherjee; Dibbendhu Khanra; Kaushik Biswas
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 10.  Lower extremity arterial disease in patients with diabetes: a contemporary narrative review.

Authors:  Mathilde Nativel; Louis Potier; Laure Alexandre; Laurence Baillet-Blanco; Eric Ducasse; Gilberto Velho; Michel Marre; Ronan Roussel; Vincent Rigalleau; Kamel Mohammedi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 9.951

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.