| Literature DB >> 29997379 |
Jiao Zhang1, Lingzhong Xu2,3,4, Jiajia Li5,6, Long Sun7,8, Gan Ding9, Wenzhe Qin10, Qian Wang11, Jing Zhu12, Zihang Yu13, Su Xie14.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the prevalence of loneliness and to explore the association between loneliness and health service utilization among the rural elderly in Shandong Province, China.Entities:
Keywords: elderly; health service utilization; loneliness
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29997379 PMCID: PMC6068910 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of the elderly by loneliness.
| Characteristic | Total Sample | Lonely | Not Lonely |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 5514 (100) | 1381 (25.0) | 4133 (75.0) | |
|
| ||||
|
| 69.7 ± 6.5 | 70.2 ± 6.6 | 69.6 ± 6.5 | 0.003 |
|
| 0.394 | |||
| Male | 2366 (42.9) | 579 (41.9) | 1787 (43.2) | |
| Female | 3148 (57.1) | 802 (58.1) | 2346 (56.8) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Married | 4433 (80.4) | 923 (66.8) | 3510 (84.9) | |
| Single a | 1081 (19.6) | 458 (33.2) | 623 (15.1) | |
|
| 0.001 | |||
| No education | 2164 (39.2) | 602 (43.6) | 1562 (37.8) | |
| Primary | 2277 (41.3) | 522 (37.8) | 1755 (42.5) | |
| Junior or above | 1073 (19.5) | 257 (18.6) | 816 (19.7) | |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.231 | |||
| UEBMI | 265 (4.8) | 76 (5.5) | 189 (4.6) | |
| URRBMI | 3824 (93.1) | 1272 (92.1) | 3859 (93.4) | |
| Others | 39 (0.7) | 8 (0.6) | 31 (0.8) | |
| None | 79 (1.4) | 25 (1.8) | 54 (1.3) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| 1 | 775 (14.1) | 365 (26.4) | 410 (9.9) | |
| 2 | 3600 (65.3) | 812 (58.8) | 2788 (67.5) | |
| ≥3 | 1139 (20.7) | 204 (14.8) | 935 (22.6) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Q1 | 1590 (28.8) | 478 (34.6) | 1112 (26.9) | |
| Q2 | 1191 (21.6) | 318 (23.0) | 873 (21.1) | |
| Q3 | 1362 (24.7) | 310 (22.4) | 1052 (25.5) | |
| Q4 | 1371 (24.9) | 275 (19.9) | 1096 (26.5) | |
|
| ||||
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Good | 2878 (52.2) | 575 (41.6) | 2303 (55.7) | |
| Moderate | 1508 (27.3) | 408 (29.5) | 1100 (26.6) | |
| Bad | 1128 (20.5) | 398 (28.8) | 730 (17.7) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| None | 1718 (31.2) | 332 (24.0) | 1386 (33.5) | |
| 1 | 1993 (36.1) | 514 (37.2) | 1479 (35.8) | |
| ≥2 | 1803 (32.7) | 535 (38.7) | 1268 (30.7) | |
|
| 15.5 ± 4.6 | 16.3 ± 5.9 | 15.2 ± 4.0 | <0.001 |
a Single: not married/divorced/widowed or others; b UEBMI: Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance; URRBMI: Urban and Rural Residents Basic Medical Insurance; c Income: personal yearly income; SD: standard deviation; and ADL: activities of daily living.
Comparison of health service utilization between lonely and not lonely rural elderly in Shandong, China.
| Health Service Utilization | Total | Lonely (%) | Not Lonely (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Physician visits | 1177 (21.3) | 360 (26.1) | 817 (19.8) | |
| No use | 4337 (78.7) | 1021 (73.9) | 3316 (80.2) | |
|
| <0.001 | |||
| Admission | 972 (17.6) | 302 (21.9) | 670 (16.2) | |
| No use | 4542 (82.4) | 1079 (78.1) | 3463 (83.8) |
Association of loneliness and using of health service in Shandong, China.
| Variable | Model I (Outpatient Service) | Model II (Inpatient Service) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users |
| OR (95% CI) | Users |
| OR (95% CI) | |
|
| ||||||
| Lonely | 360 (30.6) | 0.003 | 1.260 (1.079, 1.472) | 302 (31.1) | 0.047 | 1.183 (1.002, 1.397) |
| Not lonely (ref) | 817 (69.4) | 670 (68.9) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| 69.5 ± 6.0 | 0.050 | 0.988 (0.977, 1.000) | 70.2 ± 6.4 | 0.127 | 1.010 (0.997, 1.022) |
|
| ||||||
| Male (ref) | 443 (37.6) | 418 (43.0) | ||||
| Female | 734 (62.4) | 0.034 | 1.178 (1.012, 1.372) | 554 (57.0) | 0.020 | 0.824 (0.700, 0.970) |
|
| ||||||
| Married (ref) | 945 (80.3) | 784 (80.7) | ||||
| Single a | 232 (19.7) | 0.019 | 1.393 (1.056, 1.837) | 188 (19.3) | 0.628 | 0.927 (0.682, 1.260) |
|
| ||||||
| No education | 480 (40.8) | 0.350 | 1.107 (0.895, 1.370) | 415 (42,7) | 0.675 | 0.953 (0.763, 1.192) |
| Primary | 499 (42.4) | 0.067 | 1.202 (0.987, 1.465) | 370 (38.1) | 0.078 | 0.829 (0.673, 1.021) |
| Junior or above (ref) | 198 (16.8) | 187 (19.2) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| UEBMI (ref) | 52 (4.4) | 47 (4.8) | ||||
| URRBMI | 1100 (93.5) | 0.348 | 1.172 (0.841, 1.634) | 909 (93.5) | 0.988 | 1.003 (0.707, 1.421) |
| Others | 11 (0.9) | 0.094 | 1.967 (0.891, 4.341) | 5 (0.5) | 0.748 | 0.846 (0.306, 2.342) |
| None | 14 (1.2) | 0.946 | 0.977 (0.496, 1.923) | 11 (1.1) | 0.636 | 0.837 (0.400, 1.751) |
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 153 (13.0) | 0.032 | 0.712 (0.521, 0.971) | 135 (13.9) | 0.846 | 0.967 (0.689, 1.358) |
| 2 | 808 (68.6) | 0.009 | 1.281(1.063, 1.544) | 657 (67.6) | 0.366 | 1.096 (0.898, 1.339) |
| ≥3 (ref) | 216 (18.4) | 180 (18.5) | ||||
|
| ||||||
| Q1 | 338 (28.7) | 0.007 | 0.761 (0.624, 0.929) | 316 (32.5) | 0.050 | 1.247 (1.000, 1.555) |
| Q2 | 280 (23.8) | 0.386 | 0.913 (0.744, 1.121) | 218 (22.4) | 0.244 | 1.148 (0.910, 1.449) |
| Q3 | 274 (23.3) | 0.008 | 0.761 (0.623, 0.930) | 251 (25.8) | 0.067 | 1.231 (0.986, 1.538) |
| Q4 (ref) | 285 (24.2) | 187 (19.2) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Good (ref) | 434 (36.9) | 304 (31.3) | ||||
| Moderate | 347 (29.5) | 0.021 | 1.217 (1.030, 1.438) | 308 (31.7) | <0.001 | 1.597 (1.332, 1.914) |
| Bad | 396 (33.6) | <0.001 | 2.014 (1.685, 2.408) | 360 (37.0) | <0.001 | 2.463 (2.032, 2.985) |
|
| ||||||
| None (ref) | 128 (10.9) | 120 (12.3) | ||||
| 1 | 458 (38.9) | <0.001 | 3.336 (2.695, 4.131) | 309 (31.8) | <0.001 | 2.019 (1.607, 2.536) |
| ≥2 | 591 (50.2) | <0.001 | 4.901 (3.943, 6.093) | 543 (55.9) | <0.001 | 4.119 (3.292, 5.155) |
|
| 15.8 ± 4.9 | 0.104 | 0.988 (0.973, 1.003) | 16.3 ± 5.7 | 0.801 | 1.002 (0.988, 1.016) |
a Single: not married/divorced/widowed or others; b UEBMI: Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance; URRBMI: Urban and Rural Residents Basic Medical Insurance; c Income: personal yearly income; OR: odds ratio; SD standard deviation; and ADL: activities of daily living.