Literature DB >> 29997240

Data-Driven Approach to Identify Subgroups of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients With Different Prognoses and Aldosterone Antagonist Response Patterns.

João Pedro Ferreira1,2, Kevin Duarte1, John J V McMurray3, Bertram Pitt4, Dirk J van Veldhuisen5, John Vincent6, Tariq Ahmad7, Jasper Tromp5, Patrick Rossignol1, Faiez Zannad8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have a poor prognosis. The identification of subgroups with different outcomes and treatment response patterns may help to tailor strategies to each individual patient. We present an exploratory study of patients enrolled in the EMPHASIS-HF trial (Eplerenone in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure and Mild Symptoms) using latent class analysis with validation using the EPHESUS trial (Eplerenone, a Selective Aldosterone Blocker, in Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction) to identify subgroups of patients with different prognosis and response to eplerenone therapy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Latent class analysis identifies mutually exclusive groups of individuals maximizing within-group similarities and between-group differences. In the EMPHASIS-HF trial, 2279 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients were randomized to eplerenone or placebo and were characterized according to 18 clinical features. Subgroup definitions were applied to 6472 patients enrolled in the EPHESUS trial to validate observations. Event-free survival and effect of eplerenone on the composite of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization were determined for each subgroup. Four subgroups were identified with significant differences in event-free survival (P=0.002). The subgroup C had the worst event-free survival in both studies and was characterized by older age, lower body mass index, worse renal function, higher baseline potassium levels, high prevalence of anemia, diabetes mellitus, previous revascularization and higher rates of eplerenone discontinuation, and hyperkalemia during follow-up. Two subgroups (B and C) showed a poorer response to eplerenone in both studies and these groups shared common features such as lower body mass index and high prevalence of anemia. Clinical profiles, prognosis, and treatment response patterns of the 4 subgroups applied in EPHESUS trial presented similarities to those observed in EMPHASIS.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a data-driven approach, we identified heart failure with reduced ejection fraction subgroups with significantly different prognoses and potentially different responses to eplerenone. However, these data should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and prospective validation is warranted, to assess the potential clinical implications of these subgroups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00232180.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aldosterone; diabetes mellitus; eplerenone; heart failure; hyperkalemia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29997240     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.004926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  9 in total

1.  Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Detailed Phenotypes, Prognosis, and Response to Spironolactone.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen; Sarah J Schrauben; Lei Zhao; Michael D Basso; Mary Ellen Cvijic; Zhuyin Li; Melissa Yarde; Zhaoqing Wang; Priyanka T Bhattacharya; Diana A Chirinos; Stuart Prenner; Payman Zamani; Dietmar A Seiffert; Bruce D Car; David A Gordon; Kenneth Margulies; Thomas Cappola; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 12.035

2.  Embracing the Long Road to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; David E Lanfear
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Model-based comorbidity clusters in patients with heart failure: association with clinical outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Authors:  Claudia Gulea; Rosita Zakeri; Jennifer K Quint
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Head-to-head comparison of clustering methods for heterogeneous data: a simulation-driven benchmark.

Authors:  Gregoire Preud'homme; Kevin Duarte; Kevin Dalleau; Claire Lacomblez; Emmanuel Bresso; Malika Smaïl-Tabbone; Miguel Couceiro; Marie-Dominique Devignes; Masatake Kobayashi; Olivier Huttin; João Pedro Ferreira; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetics of novel glucose-lowering drugs.

Authors:  Wolfgang Rathmann; Brenda Bongaerts
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Phenomapping in patients experiencing worsening renal function during hospitalization for acute heart failure.

Authors:  Ryuichiro Yagi; Makoto Takei; Shun Kohsaka; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Nobuhiro Ikemura; Satoshi Shoji; Nozomi Niimi; Satoshi Higuchi; Ayumi Goda; Takashi Kohno; Yuji Nagatomo; Yosuke Nishihata; Yasumori Sujino; Mike Saji; Yukinori Ikegami; Shintaro Nakano; Toshiyuki Takahashi; Keiichi Fukuda; Tsutomu Yoshikawa
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-20

7.  Novel Phenotyping for Acute Heart Failure-Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Approach.

Authors:  Szymon Urban; Mikołaj Błaziak; Maksym Jura; Gracjan Iwanek; Agata Zdanowicz; Mateusz Guzik; Artur Borkowski; Piotr Gajewski; Jan Biegus; Agnieszka Siennicka; Maciej Pondel; Petr Berka; Piotr Ponikowski; Robert Zymliński
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-27

8.  Phenotypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and effect of spironolactone treatment.

Authors:  Manting Choy; Weihao Liang; Jiangui He; Michael Fu; Yugang Dong; Xin He; Chen Liu
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-05-19

9.  Evaluating sensitivity to classification uncertainty in latent subgroup effect analyses.

Authors:  Wen Wei Loh; Jee-Seon Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.612

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.