| Literature DB >> 29996560 |
Jiangshan Liu1, Ming Chen2, Tangfeng Yang3, Jie Wu4.
Abstract
In complex discrete manufacturing environment, there used to be a poor network and an isolated information island in production line, which led to slow information feedback and low utilization ratio, hindering the construction of enterprise intelligence. To solve these problems, uncertain factors in the production process and demands of sensor network were analyzed; hierarchical topology design method and the deployment strategy of the complexity industrial internet of things were proposed; and a big data analysis model and a system security protection system based on the network were established. The weight of each evaluation index was calculated using analytic hierarchy process, which established the intelligentized evaluation system and model. An actual production scene was also selected to validate the feasibility of the method. A diesel engine production workshop and the enterprise MES were used as an example to establish a network topology. The intelligence level based on both subjective and objective factors were evaluated and analyzed considering both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Analysis results show that the network topology design method and the intelligentize evaluation system were feasible, could improve the intelligence level effectively, and the network framework was expansible.Entities:
Keywords: AHP; complexity environment; intelligentize evaluation system; sensor network; topology strategy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29996560 PMCID: PMC6068506 DOI: 10.3390/s18072224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
The production status and existing problems.
| Name | Status | Problem |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment | Low intelligence, poor network | Information isolated island |
| Product | Multiple Species and Small Batch | Difficult to produce and manage |
| Design | Complex shape and high requirement | Difficult to Synergetic design |
| Schedule | Frequent change plan | Non-dynamic scheduling |
| Production | Complex data | Unable to share information |
| Management | No integration system | No interoperability |
Figure 1IIoT network design strategy process.
Figure 2Hierarchical structure of IoT network.
Figure 3Hierarchical structure of IIoT network.
Figure 4Big data analysis model in network structure.
Figure 5Safety protection system of production.
Figure 6Hierarchical structure of intelligent evaluation index.
Figure 7IIoT network topology of molding making production line.
Figure 8IIoT network topology of foundry workshop.
Figure 9IIoT network topology of cylinder head production line.
Figure 10IIoT network topology of cylinder head production line.
Figure 11IIoT network topology design of workshop MES.
Hierarchical structure model of enterprise intelligence evaluation.
| Target Layer | First-Degree Index | Second-Degree Index |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligent evaluation index | Decision support | Dynamic scheduling |
| Supply chain management | ||
| Order tracking | ||
| Quality traceability | ||
| Decision support | ||
| Systems engineering | Data definition | |
| Data management | ||
| Model Transfer | ||
| System integration | MES and ERP integration | |
| ERP and PDM integration | ||
| Economic benefit | Production cost | |
| Production efficiency | ||
| Rejection rate |
Weight vector of each evaluation index judgment matrix.
| Judgment Matrix | Maximum Eigenvalue | Eigenvector | Weight Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.15 | (0.33,0.24,0.71,0.56) | (0.18,0.13,0.39,0.30) | |
| 5.17 | (0.41,0.18,0.26,0.85,0.09) | (0.23,0.10,0.15,0.47,0.05) | |
| 3.02 | (0.20,0.35,0.92) | (0.14,0.24,0.62) | |
| 2 | (0.95,0.32) | (0.75,0.25) | |
| 3.11 | (0.22,0.32,0.92) | (0.15,0.22,0.63) |
Consistency test of judgment matrix in each evaluation indices layer.
| Judgment Matrix | CI | RI | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0375 | 0.58 | 0.0646 | |
| 0.0425 | 1.12 | 0.0379 | |
| 0.0100 | 0.58 | 0.0172 | |
| 0.0550 | 0.58 | 0.0948 |
Consistency test of judgment matrix in each evaluation indices layer.
| First-Degree Index | Weight Coefficient | Second-Degree Index | Weight Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.18 | 0.23 | ||
| 0.10 | |||
| 0.15 | |||
| 0.47 | |||
| 0.05 | |||
| 0.13 | 0.14 | ||
| 0.24 | |||
| 0.62 | |||
| 0.39 | 0.75 | ||
| 0.25 | |||
| 0.30 | 0.15 | ||
| 0.22 | |||
| 0.63 |