Literature DB >> 29995903

Ridge-furrow mulched with plastic film improves the anti-oxidative defence system and photosynthesis in leaves of winter wheat under deficit irrigation.

Shahzad Ali1,2, Yueyue Xu1, Qianmin Jia1, Irshad Ahmad1, Xiangcheng Ma1, Malak Henchiri2, Xiaolong Ren1, Peng Zhang1, Tie Cai1, Jiahua Zhang2, Zhikuan Jia1.   

Abstract

In semi-arid areas of China, the ridge-furrow mulched with plastic film (RF) cultivation system is a common water-saving agricultural technique where the shortage of water resources has become a serious problem. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether this cultivation is actually an improvement over the traditional flat planting (TF) method while testing two deficit irrigation (150, 75 mm) levels to grow winter wheat. Furthermore, we examined the responses of the anti-oxidative defence system and photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat flag leaves under three simulated rainfall (275, 200 and 125 mm) conditions. The results showed that the RF system with 150 mm deficit irrigation and 200 mm simulated rainfall condition (RF2150) treatment raised soil water content (%) at the jointing and flowering stages and achieved higher net photosynthesis rates (Pn) in flag leaves. Furthermore, such improvements were due to the reduction of malondialdehyde (MDA) content and oxidative damage during different growth stages of winter wheat. The RF2150 treatment significantly increased the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD); peroxidise (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and the content of soluble protein (SP) during different growth stages of winter wheat. Furthermore, RF2150 treatment attained the highest value at the flowering stage, while also exhibiting significant declines in contents of proline, MDA, H2O2 and O2 in flag leaves. The higher free H2O2 and O2 scavenging capacity and better anti-oxidative enzyme activities under the RF2150 treatment were due to the lower level of lipid peroxidation, which effectively protected the photosynthetic machinery. The net photosynthetic rate of flag leaves was positively correlated with SOD, POD, CAT, APX and SP activities, and negatively correlated with proline, MDA, H2O2 and O2 contents. We concluded that the RF2150 treatment was the better water-saving management strategy because it significantly delayed flag leaf senescence and caused the increases in SWC, WUE, Pn, antioxidant enzyme activities and grain yield of winter wheat grown in semi-arid regions of China.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29995903      PMCID: PMC6040750          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

In semi-arid regions of China, water shortages due to inadequate and unpredictable rainfall have restricted plant growth and development more so than any other environmental factor [1]. Drought stress decreases the photosynthetic capacity of a crop to different degrees during its various growth stages [2]. During the critical growth stages of crops, water shortages induce leaf senescence; decrease photosynthetic capacity and cause oxidative damage [3]. Furthermore, [4] estimated that in 2050, drought stress will cause serious harm to crop growth in more than 50% of arable lands. Despite the low amounts of precipitation in semi-arid regions, it is important to take advantage of the light rainfall events to increase soil water storage [5]. The primary agricultural practice in these semi-arid areas used to sustain crop growth and yield is through the combinatorial use of light rainfall events and deficit irrigation [6, 7]. Plastic film mulching with the ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting (RFRH) system is an effective technique employed to collect water from light precipitation events to improve rainwater use efficiency [8, 9]. Therefore, in this present study, we investigated the interactive effects of cultivation models with deficit irrigation strategies to improve the anti-oxidative defence system and photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions. Many physiological changes occur in crops under drought stress. Drought stress can negatively affect grain filling and photosynthetic rates in crops by reducing low soluble protein (SP) content in flag leaves and thus, plant sucrose content [10]. Water stress induces stomatal closure, which reduces the diffusion of CO2 from the atmosphere into the cell and consequently, decreases photosynthetic activity [11]. During drought conditions, supplemental irrigation promotes plant tissue development, leading to significant increases in photosynthesis and SP content of flag leaves [12]. Drought stress cause to decrease the Pn and total Chl ab, at the grain filling stage wheat leaves start to senesce and the photosynthetic machine quickly disassembles [13]. This leaves senesce linked with decline in photosynthetic capacity of flag leaves [14]. Drought stress promotes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as H2O2 and O2-, which leads to chlorophyll damage and a decrease in the chlorophyll stability index [15]. Plant water stress is often linked to increased oxidative stress owing to enhanced accumulation of ROS [16, 17]. Normal plant metabolism can be destroyed by ROS through oxidative damage to lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. Therefore, oxidative damage negatively affects plant performance, Pn and components of chlorophyll [18]. Reactive oxygen species can cause damage of cell membrane and produce malondialdehyde (MDA). The content of MDA in wheat significantly increased and reached maximal levels at the mature stage while under water stress compared to that under conditions without water stress [19]. However, crops have developed advanced anti-oxidant defence systems using enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidise (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), to reduce H2O2 and O2- production [20]. Thus, attaining higher activity rates of SOD, POD, CAT and APX and low MDA, H2O2 and O2- production in flag leaves is a key strategy to improve the photosynthetic capacity and chlorophyll content of plants under drought conditions [21]. Amino acid proline is known to be the first responding enzyme in plants exposed to water stress and plays sufficient roles in plant stress tolerance [22, 23]. Proline acts as an osmolyte and promotes plant damage repair by increasing anti-oxidant activity during drought conditions [24]. Thus, strategies to protect the flag leaves from oxidative damage and delay the senescence process are essential to improving the anti-oxidative defence system [25]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been carried out to understand the plant response to drought-induced oxidative stress and photosynthetic capacity of winter wheat flag leaves under field conditions during complete life cycle of wheat. The purposes of the present study were to clarify the responses of two cultivation models under deficit irrigation and effects of different simulated rainfall conditions in water-stressed plants based on the differentiation of its improving soil water content from physiological anti-drought function. The interaction effects of cultivation models, deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall conditions in relation to production, antioxidant metabolism and detoxifying system of ROS are also examined.

Materials and methods

Study site description

The field study was performed during 2015–2017 at the Northwest A&F University, Shaanxi Province, China (34°20'N, 108°24'E). The experimental site was 466.7 m above sea level, annual mean temperature is 12.9°C, and the annual evaporation rate was 1753 mm. The total duration of daylight was 2196 hours per year, with a f<span class="Chemical">rost-free period of 220 days per year. The mean soil bulk density was 1.37 g cm−3. The averages of two years of available NPK data were 39.4 mg kg-1, 7.98 mg kg-1 and 99.94 mg kg-1. At the 0–20 cm soil layer, the soil organic matter was 10.88 g kg−1 and the pH was 7.80.

Experimental design and treatments

The trial was conducted in large-sized waterproof sheds. The internal shed dimensions were 32 m (length) ×15 m (width) × 3 m (height). The sheds had a transpn>arent plastic-covered roof and four open sides. The mobile sheds were used to manage natural precipitation. In this research, we adopted the use of a rainfall simulator (RS) to supply the crop water requirements, and no natural precipitation occurred during the winter wheat growing season. The RS was used according to methods in a previous study [26]. In the precipitation simulation, three total seasonal precipitations, 125, 200, and 275 mm, corresponded to light, moderate, and heavy rainfall levels. This precipitation level partitioning was derived from the spatial and temporal characteristics of the precipitation distribution in the semi-arid regions of China over the past 50 years. A detailed description of the precipitation determination is shown in Table 1. In this simulation research, the partition of the application volume in pulsed precipitation events was not completely realistic under field conditions but was reasonably close.
Table 1

Partition of rainfall simulation during winter wheat-growing seasons.

Growth stagesRainfall eventsRainfall durationDaily rainfall distribution (mm)
125 mm200 mm275 mm
Seedling228–29 October253240
24–25 November132230
Wintering218–19 December454
22–23 January356
Green126–27 February51012
Jointing120–21 March152443
Grain filling39–10 April153025
26–27 April152225
10–11 May152545
Maturing123–24 May152545
In 2015–17, we conducted field research trial to explore the potential role of two cultivation models: (1) the ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting (RF); and (2) traditional flat planting (TF), under two deficit irrigation (150, 75 mm) levels and three simulated rainfall (1: 275, 2: 200, 3: 125 mm) levels in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three repli<span class="Gene">cates. Using a precise <span class="Chemical">water meter, half of the deficit irrigation was supplied on December 12, 2015 and December 15, 2016 (before the re-wintering stage) and the other half was supplied on March 28, 2016 and March 25, 2017 at the jointing stage. The deficit irrigation volumes for 150 and 75 mm were measured according to the irrigation area. The irrigation area for the TF cultivation treatment was 6.3 m2 (2.0 m × 3.15 m) and the irrigation volume was 0.95 and 0.47 m3 under 150 and 75 mm, respectively. The irrigation area under the RF technique of the two furrows was 3.78 m2 (1.2 m × 3.15 m) and the irrigation volumes of the two furrows were 0.57 and 0.28 m3. The RF technique used a ridge height of 15 cm with a ratio of furrow to ridge widths of 60:40 cm. Four rows of wheat were sown in furrows. Weeds were controlled manually during each growing season of the winter wheat crop. Wheat cultivar (Xinong 979) was sown at the rate of 2.25 × 106 seeds ha-1. The seeds were planted with an inter-row space of 20 cm on October 15 in 2015 and on October 10 in 2016. Wheat was hand harvested on June 2 in 2016 and on May 27 in 2017. Nitrogen (urea) at 225 kg ha-1 and phosphorus (diammonium phosphate) at75 kg ha-1 were applied at the time of planting.

Data collection

Soil water content

The soil <span class="Chemical">water content (SWC) was calculated at the sowing time, jointing stage, flowering stage, grain filling stage and maturity stage during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 study year. Moisture contents of the 0–100 cm soil layers at 10 cm intervals were recorded using a TDR meter (Time-Domain Reflectometry, Germany). The seasonal evapotranspiration rate was calculated using the following Eq (1) [26]: where P (mm) is the precipitation; I (mm) is the irrigation; ΔW (mm) is the soil moisture content for the 0–200 cm soil depths between planting time and maturity stage, or between the growth stages. <span class="Chemical">Water use efficiency (WUE, kg ha−1 mm−1) was calculated using the following Eq (2) [26]: where Y is the grain yield (kg <span class="Gene">ha-1) which was measured at maturity in the central four rows of each plot, including the combined area of the ridges and furrows, and ET is the total evapotranspiration (mm) over the growing season.

Photosynthetic and estimation of photosynthetic pigments

The net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was measured using a LI-Cor LI-6400XT portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT, LI-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). Measurements from the fully expanded flag leaves were taken on sunny days between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. The <span class="Chemical">CO2 concentration in the leaf chamber was set at 380 μmol mol-1 and the photosynthetic active radiation was set at 1100 μmol m-2 s-1. At jointing, flowering and grain filling stage, 9 leaves from five individual plants in each of the three repli<span class="Gene">cates of each treatment were analyzed.

Enzyme extracts preparation

0.5 g of flag leaves with removed midrib was homogenized 5 mL of 50 mmol L-1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA-Na2 and 1% insoluble PVP. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 15,000 x g at 4 0C. After centrifuged the upper supernatant was taken and used for enzyme assay.

Assays of antioxidant enzyme activities

Total superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was analyzed at 560 nm according to the technique of [27, 28, 29]. SOD activity was expressed as U g-1 FW h-1. POD activity was calculated with guaiacol at 470 nm according to the technique of [30]. POD activity was expressed as U g-1 FW min-1. Assayed of CAT activity was according to the method of [9]. CAT activity was expressed as U g-1 FW min-1. Analyzed of MDA content was according to the technique of [31]. MDA content was expressed as μmol g-1 FW. According to the Coomassie brilliant blue (G250) method described by [32] soluble protein concentration of flag leaves was measured. Soluble protein content was expressed as mg g-1 FW.

Measurement of O2- and H2O2

O2- content was determined by the modification of the method of [33] described by [34]. 200 mg of powered fresh samples were homogenized with 1,000 μL of 65 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. 100 μL of the clear supernatants were mixed with 75 μL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) and 25 μL of 10 mM hydroxylamine hydrochloride, and incubated at room temperature for 20 min. After derivatization with 400 μL of 17 mM La-sulfanilic acid and 400 ml of 7 mM L-1-α-naphthylamine, O2- content was analyzed at 530 nm. Superoxide radicals production rate was expressed μmol g-1 FW. To determine H2O2 concentrations, 200 mg of powered fresh samples were homogenized with 400 μl of acetone and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. H2O2 content in the supernatants was analyzed at 415 nm [35, 34]. H2O2 content was expressed as μmol g-1 FW.

APX activity and proline contents

APX activity was assayed by monitoring the rate of reduced ascorbate (AsA) oxidation at 290 nm and was calculated using an extinction coefficient (ε) of 2.8 mmol L–1 cm–1, according to [36]. Proline content in the leaves was analyzed at 520 nm according to the technique of [37]. The proline content (μmol g-1 FW) in the samples was calculated using the standard curve.

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS 18.0, and data obtained from each sampling event were analysed separately. Multiple comparisons were tested with Duncan’s new multiple range test. Mean values were evaluated through (LSD 0.05) multiple comparison tests, if the F tests were significant.

Results

Soil water content (%), net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and soluble protein (SP) content

The R system had significantly greater soil <span class="Chemical">water content (SWC) at soil depths of 0–100 cm during various growth stages of <span class="Species">wheat under various simulated precipitation and deficit irrigation levels than that of the F system (P < 0.05, Fig 1). There were non-significant differences in SWC at sowing time (ST) among all the treatments during both study years. Samples from the R1150 treatment had significantly higher SWC than that of all of the other treatments at each growth stage (with the exception of the R2150 treatment). The SWC was significantly greater under the R system as the precipitation and irrigation levels increased more than that of F method. During the two years of study, the R system significantly increased SWC by 30.4% more than that of F system. The SWC significantly increased from the jointing to the flowering stages, while SWC showed a significantly decreasing trend from the flowering to the grain filling and harvesting stages among all the treatments during both study years. The SWC significantly increased by 13.4% more in the R2150 treatment than that of R3150 treatment.
Fig 1

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on average soil water content (%) at the depth of 0–100 cm soil layers under simulated rainfall conditions at different growth stages of winter wheat during 2015–2017.

Note: R150: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 150 mm deficit irrigation; R75: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 75 mm deficit irrigation; F150: traditional flat cultivation and 150 mm deficit irrigation; F75: traditional flat cultivation and 75 mm deficit irrigation. Three different simulated rainfall concentrations 275 mm, 200 mm and 125 mm were used. ST: sowing time; JS: jointing stage; FS: flowering stage; GFS: grain filling stage; MS: maturing stage. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3).

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on average soil water content (%) at the depth of 0–100 cm soil layers under simulated rainfall conditions at different growth stages of winter wheat during 2015–2017.

Note: R150: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 150 mm deficit irrigation; R75: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 75 mm deficit irrigation; F150: traditional flat cultivation and 150 mm deficit irrigation; F75: traditional flat cultivation and 75 mm deficit irrigation. Three different simulated rainfall concentrations 275 mm, 200 mm and 125 mm were used. ST: sowing time; JS: jointing stage; FS: flowering stage; GFS: grain filling stage; MS: maturing stage. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). The Pn and SP content of winter wheat flag leaves significantly increased with increasing precipitation concentration and irrigation levels under both cultivation methods at different growth stages. The SP content was closely correlated to Pn and significantly increased the photosynthetic rates of flag leaves. Greater SP content in flag leaves as a result of improve soil water content can sustain a higher Pn (Figs 2 and 3). The Pn and SP content of wheat flag leaves were significantly higher from the jointing to flowering stages, whereas, they significantly declined from the flowering to grain filling stages in the two years of the same treatments (Figs 2 and 3). The mean Pn and SP content under the RF1150, RF2150 and RF3150 treatments were significantly greater by (14.5% and 13.5%), (10.4% and 12.7%) and (25.8% and 23.7%), respectively than those in the TF1150, TF2150 and TF3150 treatments. In the two years of study, Pn and SP content under the RF1150 and RF2150 treatments were significantly higher than those in the TF1150 and TF2150 treatments at the jointing, flowering and grain filling stages. However, when precipitation increased from 200 to 275 mm, there were no significant differences recorded in Pn and SP content under both cultivation methods at different growth stages. The RF system had significantly affected the Pn and SP content of flag leaves at each simulated precipitation level and deficit irrigation concentration during the later growth stages of winter wheat, whereas, the TF system did not.
Fig 2

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on net photosynthesis rate (Pn) of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: R150: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 150 mm deficit irrigation; R75: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 75 mm deficit irrigation; F150: traditional flat cultivation and 150 mm deficit irrigation; F75: traditional flat cultivation and 75 mm deficit irrigation. Three different simulated rainfall concentrations 275 mm, 200 mm and 125 mm were used. JS: jointing stage; FS: flowering stage; GFS: grain filling stage. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3).

Fig 3

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on soluble protein content (SP) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on net photosynthesis rate (Pn) of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: R150: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 150 mm deficit irrigation; R75: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 75 mm deficit irrigation; F150: traditional flat cultivation and 150 mm deficit irrigation; F75: traditional flat cultivation and 75 mm deficit irrigation. Three different simulated rainfall concentrations 275 mm, 200 mm and 125 mm were used. JS: jointing stage; FS: flowering stage; GFS: grain filling stage. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3).

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on soluble protein content (SP) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidise (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities

Table 2, Fig 4 and Fig 5 show that SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves significantly increased with increasing precipitation and irrigation levels at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages under both cultivation methods. The maximum SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves were recorded under the RF1150 treatment at the flowering stage but had no significant difference with that of the grain filling stage, after which the SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves quickly declined at the maturity stage. In addition, the difference between the RF1150 and RF2150 treatments was not significant at all growth stages of winter wheat. For both cultivation methods, SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves significantly increased from the jointing to flowering stages and sharply declined from the grain filling to maturity stages at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall level. The RF cultivation method had significantly greater effects on the SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves during the different growth stages than in the TF cultivation method. The two years of data of the four different growth stages revealed that the mean values of SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves under the RF1150, RF2150 and RF3150 treatments were significantly greater by 5.6%, 23.4% and 14.4%), (12.9%, 35.3% and 18.5%) and (18.1%, 29.2% and 15.9%), respectively than those in the TF1150, TF2150 and TF3150 treatments. There were non-significant effects on SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves when plants were treated with simulated rainfall of 275 mm or 200 mm levels at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages.
Table 2

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (U g-1 FW h-1) in winter wheat leaves of different treatments during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017.

TreatmentsDeficit irrigationSOD activity (U g-1 FW h-1)
2015–20162016–2017
JSFSGFSMSJSFSGFSMS
RF1150614a805a786a543a637a815a801a555a
RF175591b766c708c442c610c777b725c452d
RF2150599b780b747b523b633a813a766b533b
RF275587c752c681d420d609c762c700c429e
RF3150591b740d716c413d622b773b754b500c
RF375583c688e651e258e604c698d670d358f
mean594A755A715A433A619A773A736A471A
TF1150584a773a762a465a617a790a793a479a
TF175565b734b675b385c595b750b700b399c
TF2150553b688c647c418b620a714c706b430b
TF275461d656d634c366d490e670d659c199e
TF3150519c678c544d349e559c700c609d366d
TF375511c650d520e145d540d668d544e169f
mean532B697B630B355B570B715B669B340B
Analysis of varianceCM********
R********
DI********
CM x Rnsns*nsnsnsnsns
CM x DInsns*nsnsns**
R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
CM x R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respectively. ns denotes no significant different

*significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

Fig 4

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on peroxidase (POD) activity of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Fig 5

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on catalase (CAT) activity of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on peroxidase (POD) activity of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on catalase (CAT) activity of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage. a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage. b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indi<span class="Gene">cate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respn>ectively. ns denotes no significant different *significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation. Under the RF system, the APX activity of flag leaves was significantly greater at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall level than that of the TF system (Table 3). However, data of the two years from the four different growth stages of winter wheat revealed that the RF1150 and RF2150 treatments had significantly greater mean APX activity in flag leaves, by 29.3% and 11.3% respectively, than that of the RF3150 treatment. Under the RF175 and RF275 treatments, APX activity of winter wheat flag leaves were significantly higher by 30.1% and 6.6%, respectively, than that of the RF375 treatment. Under both cultivation methods, the APX activity of flag leaves significantly increased from jointing to flowering stages, while rapidly increased from flowering to maturity stages at each irrigation and simulated rainfall concentrations.
Table 3

Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity (nkat mg–1 protein) in winter wheat leaves of different treatments during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017.

TreatmentsDeficit irrigationAPX activity (nkat mg–1 protein)
2015–20162016–2017
JSFSGFSMSJSFSGFSMS
RF115076.2a85.6a112.0a121.0a80.0a97.4a116.8a122.9a
RF17570.7b79.5b97.0b106.0b74.2b84.8b99.9b104.6b
RF215075.5a82.0a87.1c96.1c79.6a90.0a94.2b102.2b
RF27561.4c68.8d72.8d81.8d63.9c73.6c78.0d87.7c
RF315072.8b73.3c75.3d84.3d76.8a79.7b83.4c92.5c
RF37559.4c61.4e68.0d77.0d61.9c68.1c74.9d83.5d
mean69.3A75.1A85.4A94.4A72.7A82.3A91.2A98.9A
TF115072.6a78.5a85.1a91.1a74.8a82.9a91.7a97.7a
TF17570.3a70.6b79.4b85.4b73.5a74.6b85.4b91.4b
TF215063.7b75.0a79.4b85.4b66.9b77.9a85.6b91.6b
TF27561.4b63.4c64.8c70.8c64.6b67.4c70.1c76.1c
TF315061.0b65.2c70.8c76.8c64.3b67.6c74.8c79.8c
TF37551.8c57.8d60.1d66.1d53.7c62.0d65.5d71.5d
mean63.5B68.4B73.3B79.3B66.3B72.1B78.9B84.7B
Analysis of varianceCM********
R********
DInsns*nsns**ns
CM x R*ns**nsns**
CM x DInsnsnsns*nsnsns
R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
CM x R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respectively. ns denotes no significant different

*significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage. b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indi<span class="Gene">cate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respn>ectively. ns denotes no significant different *significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline contents

Under the TF system, MDA and proline contents of wheat flag leaves at different growth stages were significantly greater than that of the RF cultivation system treated with different precipitation and deficit irrigation levels (Tables 4 and 5). Under both cultivation methods, the MDA and proline contents of flag leaves significantly decreased with increasing precipitation and irrigation concentrations at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages. The MDA contents under the TF1150 treatment at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages were significantly greater by 0.15, 0.91, 0.52, and 2.06 μmol g-1 FW, respectively, and the proline contents were significantly greater by 0.06, 0.53, 0.43, and 0.38 μmol g-1 FW, respectively, than those of the RF1150 treatment. The MDA contents under the TF2150 treatment, at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages were significantly greater by a respective 1.07, 2.87, 1.44, and 3.87 μmol g-1 FW, and the proline contents were significantly greater by a respective 0.11, 0.14, 0.36, and 0.29 μmol g-1 FW, than those of the RF2150 treatment. The MDA contents at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages, under the TF3150 treatment were significantly greater by 0.42, 2.04, 0.84, and 3.04 μmol g-1 FW), respectively, and the proline contents were significantly greater by 0.36, 0.09, 0.12, and 0.22 μmol g-1 FW, respectively, than those of the RF3150 treatment.
Table 4

Malondialdehyde (MDA) content (μmol g-1 FW) in winter wheat leaves of different treatments during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017.

TreatmentsDeficit irrigationMDA content (μmol g-1 FW)
2015–20162016–2017
JSFSGFSMSJSFSGFSMS
RF11504.80e5.20d5.09e8.20e5.10f5.69e5.49f9.10e
RF1757.09c9.29b7.49c12.29b7.39c9.94c7.89c13.19c
RF21505.06d7.09c5.46e10.09d5.36e7.69d6.06e11.39d
RF2758.30b9.52b8.70b12.52b8.60b10.12b9.30b13.82b
RF31505.65d9.01b6.05d12.01c5.95d9.81c6.75d13.61b
RF3759.90a14.37a10.30a17.37a10.20a15.17a11.00a18.97a
mean6.80B9.08B7.18B12.08B7.10B9.74B7.75B13.35B
TF11505.20e7.11e5.90f11.11e5.56e7.71f6.50e12.41e
TF1757.21c10.15c7.91c14.15c7.57c10.75d8.51c14.45c
TF21505.55d8.21d6.25d12.21d5.91e9.11e7.05d13.81d
TF2759.34b12.23b10.04b16.23b9.70b13.13b10.84b16.83b
TF31505.97d10.56c6.67d14.56c6.33d11.56c7.67d16.36b
TF37510.2a16.32a10.99a20.32a10.65a17.32a11.99a21.95a
mean7.25A10.76A7.96A14.76A7.62A11.60A8.76A15.97A
Analysis of varianceCM********
R********
DI********
CM x R*ns**ns*nsns
CM x DInsnsnsns*nsnsns
R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
CM x R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respectively. ns denotes no significant different

*significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

Table 5

Proline content (μmol g-1 FW) in winter wheat leaves of different treatments during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017.

TreatmentsDeficit irrigationProline content (μmol g-1 FW)
2015–20162016–2017
JSFSGFSMSJSFSGFSMS
RF11500.11d0.38e0.18e0.17d0.13d0.41f0.20e0.18d
RF1750.13d0.49d0.30d0.25d0.15d0.54e0.32d0.26d
RF21500.17c0.81c0.26d0.24d0.20c0.83d0.30d0.22d
RF2750.21c1.89b0.64c0.60c0.26c1.94c0.67c0.58c
RF31500.39b1.81b0.97b0.77b0.43b1.80b0.99b0.71b
RF3750.50a3.03a2.91a1.03a0.59a2.89a2.83a0.97a
mean0.25B1.40B0.88B0.51B0.29B1.40B0.89B0.49B
TF11500.16e0.66f0.50d0.48d0.17d0.69e0.52e0.49d
TF1750.19d1.01d0.74c0.63c0.22d1.06c0.76d0.64c
TF21500.24d0.94e0.81c0.70c0.27d0.96d0.84d0.68c
TF2750.32c2.03c1.01b0.89b0.34c2.08b0.99c0.87b
TF31500.48b3.03a1.18b0.88b0.51b3.00a1.50b0.82b
TF3750.86a3.12a3.03a1.25a0.90a3.09a2.99a1.19a
mean0.38A1.80A1.21A0.81A0.40A1.81A1.27A0.78A
Analysis of varianceCM********
R********
DI********
CM x Rns*nsnsns*nsns
CM x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
CM x R x DInsnsnsnsnsnsnsns

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respectively. ns denotes no significant different

*significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage. b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indi<span class="Gene">cate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respn>ectively. ns denotes no significant different *significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation. a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage. b Values are given as means, lowercase and uppercase letters indi<span class="Gene">cate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respn>ectively. ns denotes no significant different *significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

H2O2 and O2- contents

Under the TF cultivation method, the H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves significantly increased at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall levels than in the RF system (Figs 6 and 7). The H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves increased gradually at the jointing to flowering stage and from the flowering to grain filling stages. Moreover, H2O2 and O2- concentrations rapidly increased from the grain filling to maturity stages under both cultivation models at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall levels. However, the two years of data from the four different growth stages of winter wheat revealed that the TF1150, TF2150 and TF3150 treatments had produced, on average, significantly more (6.14, 7.10, 11.01 μmol g-1 FW) H2O2 and (1.13, 1.25, 1.62 μmol g-1 FW) O2- in the flag leaves than the leaves of the RF system. The H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves were significantly higher under the TF375 treatment, compared with all other treatments at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages. During the maturity stage, H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves reached the highest values under the TF cultivation method at each precipitation and deficit irrigation level that were also greater than those of the RF system.
Fig 6

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Fig 7

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on superoxide radicals (O2-) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

Effects of different cultivation models and deficit irrigation on superoxide radicals (O2-) content of winter wheat flag leaves under simulated rainfall conditions during 2015–2017 growing seasons.

Note: RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat planting and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat planting and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat planting and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. Bars represent the LSD at p = 0.05 (n = 3). Abbreviations are: JS: jointing stage, FS: flowering stage, GFS: grain filling stage, MS: maturity stage.

ET, WUE and winter wheat production

There were clear differences in ET rate among the various treatments of wheat crop, but the trend of ET rate in each year was similar (Table 6). The RF system under deficit irrigation with simulated precipitation significantly (P< 0.05) reduces the ET rate than that of TF planting in each study year. The average of two years data indicated that under the RF cultivation model, enhanced soil water and decreased soil evaporation; as a result significantly reduced ET rate by 35.8%, in 2015–16, and 26.9% in 20116–17 study year, then that of TF planting, respectively. The mean data of two years showed that ET rate of RF1150 and RF175 treatments were significantly decreased by 28.1% and 27.8%, than that of TF1150 and TF175 treatments, respectively. The mean ET rate of RF2150, and RF275 treatments were significantly declined by 32.7% and 33.7%, compared with TF2150 and TF275 treatments, respectively. The ET rate was significantly declined by 31.7% in RF3150, and 37.3% in RF375 treatment, then that of TF3150 and TF375 treatments, respectively.
Table 6

Effects of different treatments on grain yield (t ha-1), evapotranspiration (ET, mm) and water use efficiency (WUE, kg ha-1 mm-1) of winter wheat during 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 growing season.

TreatmentsDeficit irrigationGrain yield (t ha-1)ET (mm)WUE (kg ha-1 mm-1)
2015–20162016–20172015–20162016–20172015–20162016–2017
RF11507.53±0.19a7.79±0.18a323.92±36.3a332.43±38.4a23.26±0.8b23.43±0.7b
RF1757.07±0.58b6.62±0.68b314.22±41.4a325.55±39.3a22.51±0.6b20.35±0.9c
RF21507.40±0.58a7.57±0.64a260.62±37.4b260.36±41.5b28.39±1.0a29.06±1.2a
RF2756.53±0.51b5.99±0.52b259.60±43.2b250.26±34.3b25.17±1.1b23.95±0.9b
RF31505.42±0.38c3.94±0.41c241.00±32.1c249.63±38.5b22.50±0.8b15.79±0.8d
RF3754.15±0.52d2.92±0.50d215.16±39.8d221.42±33.2c19.30±0.7c13.19±0.6d
mean6.35A5.81A269.09B273.28B23.52A20.96A
TF11506.86±0.46a6.99±0.59a482.32±45.3a430.05±42.2a14.22±1.2a16.24±0.9a
TF1756.42±0.18a5.74±0.15b463.05±39.6a423.42±37.6a13.85±0.9b13.55±0.7b
TF21506.26±0.32a6.33±0.22a414.52±35.2b359.84±34.2b15.10±1.1a17.58±1.1a
TF2755.62±0.31b4.60±0.23c410.91±41.6b357.99±40.1b13.68±0.6b12.86±1.2b
TF31504.47±0.37c3.72±0.35d376.48±43.8c341.50±46.1c11.88±0.8c10.88±0.6b
TF3753.80±0.26d2.69±0.23e367.05±37.5c329.01±38.2c10.36±0.5c8.17±0.7c
mean5.56B5.01B419.06A373.64A13.18B13.21B
Analysis of varianceCM******
R***ns**
DInsnsnsnsnsns
CM x R*ns****
CM x DInsnsnsnsns*
R x DIns*nsnsnsns
CM x R x DI**nsns**

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation.

b Values are given as means±SD, lowercase and uppercase letters indicate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respectively. ns denotes no significant different

*significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation.

a RF1: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 275 mm simulated rainfall; RF2: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 200 mm simulated rainfall; RF3: ridges covered with plastic film mulch and 125 mm simulated rainfall; TF1: traditional flat cultivation and 275 mm simulated rainfall; TF2: traditional flat cultivation and 200 mm simulated rainfall; TF3: traditional flat cultivation and 125 mm simulated rainfall; 150: 150 mm deficit irrigation; 75: 75 mm deficit irrigation. b Values are given as means±SD, lowercase and uppercase letters indi<span class="Gene">cate significant differences at P ≤0.05 levels in the same line (LSD test) comparisons among different treatments and between two cultivation models, respn>ectively. ns denotes no significant different *significant different at the 0.05 probability level; CM is the cultivation models, R is the rainfall simulator, DI is the deficit irrigation. The WUE and grain yield were significantly improved by interactive effect of cultivation models with deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall levels in both study years (Table 6). The WUE and grain yield significantly enhanced with increasing supplemental irrigation and rainfall levels under both cultivation models, but differences were not significant when the precipitation was more them 200 mm. The WUE improved with the increasing of grain yield. The average of two years data indicated that WUE under the RF cultivation model significantly improved by 58.6% in 2015–16 year and 78.4% in 2016–17 year, then that of the TF planting model, respn>ectively. The mean WUE of two study years indi<span class="Gene">cated that under RF1150 and RF175 treatments were significantly improved by 53.3% and 56.4%, then that of TF1150 and TF175 treatments. The WUE of RF2150 and RF275 treatments were significantly improved by 75.8% and 85.1%, then that of TF2150 and TF275 treatments. When compared with TF3150 and TF355 treatments, the mean WUE was significantly improved by 68.3% in RF3150 treatment and 75.3% in RF375 treatment, respectively. The grain yield led to be produced maximum under the RF system with 150 mm supplemental irrigation and 200 mm rainfall concentrations compared with TF planting. The average grain yield of two years revealed that under RF system enhanced soil water and declined ET rate at field scale; as a result, RF system significantly produced maximum 0.79 t ha-1 grain yield compared with TF planting. When compared to TF2150 and TF275 treatments, the average grain yield of two-year data revealed that RF2150 and RF275 treatments were significantly improved by 1.19 t ha-1 and 1.15 t ha-1, respectively.

Pearson's correlation coefficients

Table 7 displays Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the antioxidant enzyme activities, reactive oxygen species, photosynthetic pigments, protein, proline and MDA contents of winter wheat flag laves. Significant positive correlations were observed between Pn and SOD, POD, CAT, and APX activities, as well as soluble protein content. Moreover, significant negative correlations were observed between Pn, SOD, POD, CAT, APX, soluble protein and the activities of H2O2, O2, MDA and proline content. The correlation analysis also confirmed significant positive correlations among H2O2, O2, MDA and proline content.
Table 7

Pearson's correlation coefficients of antioxidant enzyme activities, reactive oxygen species (ROS), protein, proline and MDA contents of winter wheat flag laves.

PnSODPODCATSPH2O2O2PCMDAAPX
SOD0.938*-
POD0.951*0.931*-
CAT0.928*0.934*0.991*-
SP0.943*0.969*0.949*0.953*-
H2O2-0.931*-0.924*-0.900*-0.904*-0.897*-
O2-0.903*-0.893*-0.853*-0.859*-0.885*0.981*-
PC-0.959*-0.851*-0.865*-0.829*-0.866*0.856*0.853*-
MDA-0.923*-0.906*-0.866*-0.862*-0.881*0.977*0.985*0.878*-
APX0.978*0.958*0.938*0.926*0.963*-0.928*-0.900*-0.906*-0.899*-

Pn, net photosynthesis rate; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; SP, soluble protein; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; O2, superoxide radicals; PC, proline content; MDA, malondialdehyde; APX, ascorbate peroxidise.

* Significant at the 0.01 probability level (n = 12).

Pn, net photosynthesis rate; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; POD, peroxidase; CAT, catalase; SP, soluble protein; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; O2, superoxide radicals; PC, proline content; MDA, malondialdehyde; APX, ascorbate peroxidise. * Significant at the 0.01 probability level (n = 12).

Discussion

Farming systems in semi-arid regions of China are significantly dependent upon the amount and distribution of precipitation because they have significant effects on photosynthetic capacity and thus <span class="Species">wheat production [38, 27]. Frequently, uneven distribution of rainfall leads to soil drought which negatively affects the photosynthetic capacity and anti-oxidative enzyme activities in the flag leaves of winter <span class="Species">wheat and results in drought-induced plant stress during the critical growth stages [7]. Previous studies have reported that the RF cultivation method increased soil water content and storage which significantly improved the anti-oxidative defence system of wheat flag leaves [39, 7]. This study confirmed that the RF system can significantly increase SWC by 30.4% more than that of the TF planting model. The amount in SWC significantly increased from the jointing to the flowering stages, and in contrast, decreased from the flowering to the grain filling and harvesting stages among all the treatments. The SP content was closely correlated to Pn and significantly improved the photosynthetic capacity of flag leaves. We suspect that greater SP content in flag leaves sustains a higher Pn (Figs 2 and 3). Under drought stress, the sucrose content decreased due to low SP content, which influenced grain filling rate and Pn value [10]. Water stress encourages stomatal closure, which affects the diffusion of CO2 from the air to the cell, is the major cause for decrease of Pn value [11, 28]. During drought conditions supplemental irrigation encourages the plant tissue develop, leading to a significant improve the Pn value and SP content of flag leaves [12]. This study also confirmed that the Pn and SP content under the RF1150 and RF2150 treatments were significantly higher than in the TF1150 and TF2150 treatments at jointing, flowering and grain filling stages. However, when the precipitation increased from 200 to 275 mm, there was no significant difference recorded for the Pn and SP content under both cultivation methods at different growth stages. A previous study also observed that Pn and SP content of flag leaves in wheat were greater due to the RF cultivation model with plastic film when compared to that of the TF planting without plastic film [40]. Furthermore, we observed that the RF cultivation model had significantly affected the Pn and SP content of flag leaves at each simulated precipitation and deficit irrigation concentrations during later growth stages of winter wheat. At grain filling stage the Pn value and total Chl. ab decrease due to start leaves senesce and the photosynthetic machine quickly disassemble and declines the photosynthetic capacity of flag leaves [13, 14]. Water shortage is always linked with increased oxidative stress owing to enhanced accumulation of ROS [16, 17]. In our study, we determined that H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves increased gradually at the jointing to flowering stage and from flowering to grain filling stage, while rapidly increased from grain filling to maturity stage under both cultivation models at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall levels. During maturity stage the H2O2 and O2- contents of flag leaves reached to the highest values under the TF cultivation model at each precipitation and deficit irrigation level, than in the RF system. The highest contents of ROS in response to reduced soil water storage [17]. Under severe drought significant increase of H2O2 and O2- production in wheat flag leaves [19]. In the present study, the H2O2 and O2- contents were significantly higher under the TF375 treatment, compared with all other treatments at the jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages. Normal metabolism can be destroying by ROS through oxidative damage to lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. Therefore, oxidative damage negatively affects plant performance, Pn value and chlorophyll contents [18]. ROS caused damage of membrane and produce MDA content. But, crops have developed anti-oxidant defence systems such as SOD, POD, CAT and APX to reduce the H2O2 and O2- production [20]. In the current study, the maximum SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves were recorded under the RF1150 treatment at the flowering stage. Subsequently, SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves quickly declined at the maturity stage. Under both cultivation models, SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves significantly increased from the jointing to flowering stage and rapidly declined from the grain filling to maturity stage at each deficit irrigation and simulated rainfall level. [41, 42] Confirmed that with decreasing amounts of irrigation, SP content and SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves in wheat declined, which resulted in an increased rate of leaf senescence during latter growth stages. Similarly, we determined that the RF cultivation methods had significantly higher effects on SOD, POD and CAT activities during later growth stages than the TF cultivation method. Furthermore, there were non-significant effect on the SOD, POD and CAT activities of flag leaves when supply simulated rainfall of 275 mm or 200 mm levels at jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages. The increase of SOD, POD, CAT and APX activities under water stress was also reported by [43]. Thus, increasing SOD, POD, CAT and APX activities and lowering MDA, H2O2 and O2- production in flag leaves may be key strategies of wheat plants to improve their photosynthetic capacity, total Chlcontent and CSI under water stress [44, 21]. MDA content was significantly increased under water stress than that of normal condition and reached to maximum at the mature stage [19, 41]. Our study showed that under both cultivation models, the MDA and proline contents of flag leaves were significantly decreased with increasing precipitation and irrigation amount at jointing, flowering, grain filling and maturity stages. Proline is known to be the first response of plants exposed to water stress and plays a significant role in plant stress tolerance [22, 23]. Proline acts as osmolyte and promotes plant damage repair capability by increasing anti-oxidant activity during drought conditions [24]. We concluded that the RF2150 treatment was the better water-saving management strategy because the higher free H2O2 and O2 scavenging capacity and lower level of lipid peroxidation indicate a better anti-oxidation defence system that can effectively protect the photosynthetic apparatus in winter wheat.

Conclusions

Antioxidant enzyme activities and reactive oxygen species (ROS) of wheat flag leaves varied significantly under different combinations of cultivation methods, deficit irrigation regimes and simulated rainfall concentrations. The RF2150 treatment raised average soil water content (%) from soil collected from depths of 0–100 cm during the jointing and flowering stages of wheat, and had the highest net photosynthesis rate (Pn) in the flag leaves. Moreover, such improvements were due to reducing MDA content and oxidative damage during different growth stages of winter wheat flag leaves. The RF2150 treatment significantly increased SOD, POD, CAT, APX activities and soluble protein content (SP) in flag leaves at different growth stages of winter wheat and attained the highest values at the flowering stage, whereas, contents of proline, MDA, H2O2, and O2 in flag leaves significantly declined and reached a maximum value at the maturity stage. The higher free ROS scavenging capacity and better antioxidant enzyme activities under the RF2150 treatment were due to the lower level of lipid peroxidation, which effectively protected the photosynthetic machinery. These results indicate that the RF2150 treatment significantly delayed senescence of leaves, and increased SWC, Pn, WUE, antioxidant enzyme activities and yield of winter wheat.

Soil water contents.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Net photosynthesis rate.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Antioxidant enzyme activities, reactive oxygen species (ROS), APX, proline content, soluble protein content, praline content.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Grain yield (t ha-1), evapotranspiration (ET, mm) and water use efficiency (WUE, kg ha-1 mm-1).

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.

Pearson's correlation coefficients DATA.

(XLS) Click here for additional data file.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations.

Authors:  Basia Vinocur; Arie Altman
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.740

2.  Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress.

Authors:  Erwin H Beck; Sebastian Fettig; Claudia Knake; Katja Hartig; Tribikram Bhattarai
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Effect of abscisic acid on active oxygen species, antioxidative defence system and oxidative damage in leaves of maize seedlings.

Authors:  M Jiang; J Zhang
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: a simple assay for superoxide dismutase.

Authors:  E F Elstner; A Heupel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Minimization of variation in the response to different proteins of the Coomassie blue G dye-binding assay for protein.

Authors:  S M Read; D H Northcote
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1981-09-01       Impact factor: 3.365

6.  Photosynthetic characteristics and enzymatic antioxidant capacity of leaves from wheat cultivars exposed to drought.

Authors:  Irada M Huseynova
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-07

7.  Lipid Composition and Protein Dynamics in Thylakoids of Two Wheat Cultivars Differently Sensitive to Drought.

Authors:  M. F. Quartacci; C. Pinzino; CLM. Sgherri; F. Navari-Izzo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Involvement of plasma-membrane NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid- and water stress-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize seedlings.

Authors:  Mingyi Jiang; Jianhua Zhang
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 4.116

9.  Leaf Gas Exchange and Fluorescence of Two Winter Wheat Varieties in Response to Drought Stress and Nitrogen Supply.

Authors:  Xiubo Wang; Lifang Wang; Zhouping Shangguan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Planting Patterns and Deficit Irrigation Strategies to Improve Wheat Production and Water Use Efficiency under Simulated Rainfall Conditions.

Authors:  Shahzad Ali; Yueyue Xu; Xiangcheng Ma; Irshad Ahmad; Muhammad Kamran; Zhaoyun Dong; Tie Cai; Qianmin Jia; Xiaolong Ren; Peng Zhang; Zhikuan Jia
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.