Literature DB >> 29995718

Nonobstetric Surgery During Pregnancy.

Mary Catherine Tolcher1, William E Fisher, Steven L Clark.   

Abstract

One percent to 2% of pregnant women undergo nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Historically, there has been a reluctance to operate on pregnant women based on concerns for teratogenesis, pregnancy loss, or preterm birth. However, a careful review of published data suggests four major flaws affecting much of the available literature. Many studies contain outcomes data from past years in which diagnostic testing, surgical technique, and perioperative maternal-fetal care were so different from current experience as to make these data of limited utility today. This issue is further compounded by a tendency to combine experience from vastly disparate types of surgery into a single report. In addition, reports in nonobstetric journals often focus on maternal outcomes and contain insufficient detail regarding perinatal outcomes to allow distinction between complications associated with surgical disease and those attributable to surgery itself. Finally, most series are either uncontrolled or use the general population of pregnant women as controls rather than women with surgical disease who are managed nonsurgically. Consideration of these factors as well as our own extensive experience suggests that when the risks of maternal hypotension or hypoxia are minimal, or can be adequately mitigated, indicated surgery during any trimester does not appear to subject either the mother or fetus to risks significantly beyond those associated with the disease itself or the complications of surgery in nonpregnant individuals. In some cases, reluctance to operate during pregnancy becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy in which delay in surgery contributes to adverse perinatal outcomes traditionally attributed to surgery itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29995718     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  General anaesthesia in obstetrics.

Authors:  C Delgado; L Ring; M C Mushambi
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-04-21

2.  Inadvertent Perforation of a Gravid Uterus During Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rebecca J Post; Esther Friedrich; Kevin E Amaya; Ramen H Chmait
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 3.  Orthopedic Trauma During Pregnancy; a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Meisam Jafari Kafiabadi; Amir Sabaghzadeh; Seyyed Saeed Khabiri; Mehrdad Sadighi; Amir Mehrvar; Farsad Biglari; Adel Ebrahimpour
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Propofol protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in human amnion-derived WISH cells.

Authors:  Cheul-Hong Kim; Sang-Hoon Lee; Ji-Young Yoon; Eun-Jung Kim; Jong Hoon Joo; Yeon Ha Kim; Eun-Ji Choi
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-09-27

5.  Exclusion of pregnancy in dialysis patients: diagnostic performance of human chorionic gonadotropin.

Authors:  Natalja Haninger-Vacariu; Harald Herkner; Matthias Lorenz; Marcus Säemann; Andreas Vychytil; Martin Jansen; Rodrig Marculescu; Reinhard Kramar; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Alice Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Fetal intracranial hemorrhage associated with maternal coagulopathy and vitamin K deficiency after biliary drain placement: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Muhammad Abu-Rmaileh; Abigail M Ramseyer; Lyle Burdine; Nafisa K Dajani
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.