Literature DB >> 29995679

Effect of Hospital Volume With Respect to Performing Gastric Cancer Resection on Recurrence and Survival: Results From the CRITICS Trial.

Yvette H M Claassen1, Romy M van Amelsfoort2, Henk H Hartgrink1, Johan L Dikken1, Wobbe O de Steur1, Johanna W van Sandick3, Nicole C T van Grieken4, Annemieke Cats5, Henk Boot5, Anouk K Trip2, Edwin P M Jansen2, Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg1, Jeffrey P B M Braak1, Hein Putter6, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen7, Marcel Verheij2, Cornelis J H van de Velde1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between surgical hospital volume and both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using data obtained from the international CRITICS (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach) trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In the CRITICS trial, patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomized to receive preoperative chemotherapy followed by adequate gastrectomy and either chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
METHODS: Patients in the CRITICS trial who underwent a gastrectomy with curative intent in a Dutch hospital were included in the analysis. The annual number of gastric cancer surgeries performed at the participating hospitals was obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry; the hospitals were then classified as low-volume (1-20 surgeries/year) or high-volume (≥21 surgeries/year) and matched with the CRITICS trial data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were then performed to evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) between hospital volume and both OS and DFS.
RESULTS: From 2007 through 2015, 788 patients were included in the CRITICS trial. Among these 788 patients, 494 were eligible for our study; the median follow-up was 5.0 years. Five-year OS was 59.2% and 46.1% in the high-volume and low-volume hospitals, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that undergoing surgery in a high-volume hospital was associated with higher OS [HR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.50-0.94, P = 0.020] and DFS (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.99, P = 0.040).
CONCLUSIONS: In the CRITICS trial, hospitals with a high annual volume of gastric cancer surgery were associated with higher overall and DFS. These findings emphasize the value of centralizing gastric cancer surgeries in the Western world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29995679     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  Disparities and survival in newly diagnosed gastric cancer in Hispanic patients in the United States: a propensity score matched analysis.

Authors:  Joshua Tseng; James P Miller; Jeffrey Johnson; Kevin Waters; Alexandra Gangi; Jun Gong; Miguel Burch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

Review 2.  Associations of Annual Hospital and Surgeon Volume with Patient Outcomes After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiafu Ji; Leiyu Shi; Xiangji Ying; Xinpu Lu; Fei Shan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 3.  Open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in Eastern and Western patient populations: A review of the literature and reasons for differences in outcomes.

Authors:  Mason D Stillman; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Adherence to guidelines at the patient- and hospital-levels is associated with improved overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sarah R Kaslow; Zhongyang Ma; Leena Hani; Katherine Prendergast; Gerardo Vitiello; Ann Y Lee; Russell S Berman; Judith D Goldberg; Camilo Correa-Gallego
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist rosiglitazone specifically represses tumour metastatic potential in chromatin inaccessibility-mediated FABP4-deficient gastric cancer.

Authors:  Qi-Yue Chen; Xiao-Bo Huang; Ya-Jun Zhao; Hua-Gen Wang; Jia-Bin Wang; Li-Chao Liu; Ling-Qian Wang; Qing Zhong; Jian-Wei Xie; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 11.556

6.  Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Techniques for Gastric Cancer Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Joon Y Park; Arjun Verma; Zachary K Tran; Michael A Mederos; Peyman Benharash; Mark Girgis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Survival trends of patients with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma in the US and European countries: the impact of decreasing resection rates.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Lina Jansen; Rob H A Verhoeven; Jelle P Ruurda; Liesbet Van Eycken; Harlinde De Schutter; Jan Johansson; Mats Lindblad; Tom B Johannesen; Vesna Zadnik; Tina Žagar; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Petra Schrotz-King; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 8.  The Impact of Perioperative Events on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis in Patients after Radical Gastrectomy: A Review.

Authors:  Xing Zhi; Xiaohong Kuang; Jian Li
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in middle-low-volume centers in Western countries: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Maria Garbarino; Gianluca Costa; Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca; Giorgio Castagnola; Paolo Mercantini; Massimiliano Di Paola; Simone Vita; Luigi Masoni
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Stefano Caruso; Rosina Giudicissi; Martina Mariatti; Stefano Cantafio; Gian Matteo Paroli; Marco Scatizzi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.