Literature DB >> 29995554

Self-directed learning using clinical decision support: costs and outcomes.

Kieran Walsh1, Stephen Maloney2.   

Abstract

It is an axiom of research into cost and value in education that the way to deliver low cost education is to save on faculty cost, as this makes up the majority of the costs in most educational programmes. Thus, any savings that can be made to faculty costs will make a significant contribution to reducing overall cost. But this may not be the case with all programmes, or with all methods of learning. In particular, it may not be the case with self-directed learning. The cost of self-directed learning can be divided up into cost categories just like any other form of learning. As such, it will be made up of faculty cost, learner costs, infrastructure and facility costs, content costs and technology costs. However, in postgraduate education, these costs are largely the same as those that account for clinical care, as postgraduate learners learn as they work. To get maximum value from self-directed learning that will support clinical decisions, learners will need to have access to excellent clinical decision support resources that will facilitate self-directed learning.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29995554     DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.7.408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Hosp Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1750-8460            Impact factor:   0.825


  1 in total

Review 1.  Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning.

Authors:  Hee Young Kang; Hae Ran Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.