Literature DB >> 29995423

Automated in Vivo Nanosensing of Breath-Borne Protein Biomarkers.

Haoxuan Chen1, Jing Li1, Xiangyu Zhang1, Xinyue Li1, Maosheng Yao1, Gengfeng Zheng2.   

Abstract

Toxicology and bedside medical condition monitoring is often desired to be both ultrasensitive and noninvasive. However, current biomarker analyses for these purposes are mostly offline and fail to detect low marker quantities. Here, we report a system called dLABer (detection of living animal's exhaled breath biomarker) that integrates living rats, breath sampling, microfluidics, and biosensors for the automated tracking of breath-borne biomarkers. Our data show that dLABer could selectively detect (online) and report differences (of up to 103-fold) in the levels of inflammation agent interleukin-6 (IL-6) exhaled by rats injected with different ambient particulate matter (PM). The dLABer system was further shown to have an up to 104 higher signal-to-noise ratio than that of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when analyzing the same breath samples. In addition, both blood-borne IL-6 levels analyzed via ELISA in rats injected with different PM extracts and PM toxicity determined by a dithiothreitol (DTT) assay agreed well with those determined by the dLABer system. Video recordings further verified that rats exposed to PM with higher toxicity (according to a DTT assay and as revealed by dLABer) appeared to be less physically active. All the data presented here suggest that the dLABer system is capable of real-time, noninvasive monitoring of breath-borne biomarkers with ultrasensitivity. The dLABer system is expected to revolutionize pollutant health effect studies and bedside disease diagnosis as well as physiological condition monitoring at the single-protein level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; biosensor; dLABer; disease monitoring; particulate matter; physiological condition; real time; toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29995423     DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nano Lett        ISSN: 1530-6984            Impact factor:   11.189


  5 in total

1.  Nanosensors based on LSPR are able to serologically differentiate dengue from Zika infections.

Authors:  Alice F Versiani; Estefânia M N Martins; Lidia M Andrade; Laura Cox; Glauco C Pereira; Edel F Barbosa-Stancioli; Mauricio L Nogueira; Luiz O Ladeira; Flávio G da Fonseca
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  On airborne transmission and control of SARS-Cov-2.

Authors:  Maosheng Yao; Lu Zhang; Jianxin Ma; Lian Zhou
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Electrochemical sensing: A prognostic tool in the fight against COVID-19.

Authors:  Sharda Kotru; Martin Klimuntowski; Hashim Ridha; Zakir Uddin; Ali A Askhar; Gurmit Singh; Matiar M R Howlader
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 14.908

Review 4.  Micro- and nanosensors for detecting blood pathogens and biomarkers at different points of sepsis care.

Authors:  Alejandra Alba-Patiño; Andreu Vaquer; Enrique Barón; Steven M Russell; Marcio Borges; Roberto de la Rica
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.833

5.  Nanoparticle Transfer Biosensors for the Non-Invasive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Trapped in Surgical Face Masks.

Authors:  Andreu Vaquer; Alejandra Alba-Patiño; Cristina Adrover-Jaume; Steven M Russell; María Aranda; Marcio Borges; Joana Mena; Alberto Del Castillo; Antonia Socias; Luisa Martín; María Magdalena Arellano; Miguel Agudo; Marta Gonzalez-Freire; Manuela Besalduch; Antonio Clemente; Enrique Barón; Roberto de la Rica
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 7.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.