Literature DB >> 29995389

Water Flow and Biofilm Cover Influence Environmental DNA Detection in Recirculating Streams.

Arial J Shogren1, Jennifer L Tank1, Scott P Egan2, Olivia August1, Emma J Rosi3, Brittany R Hanrahan1, Mark A Renshaw1, Crysta A Gantz1, Diogo Bolster4.   

Abstract

The increasing use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for determination of species presence in aquatic ecosystems is an invaluable technique for both ecology as a field and for the management of aquatic ecosystems. We examined the degradation dynamics of fish eDNA using an experimental array of recirculating streams, also using a "nested" primer assay to estimate degradation among eDNA fragment sizes. We introduced eDNA into streams with a range of water velocities (0.1-0.8 m s-1) and substrate biofilm coverage (0-100%) and monitored eDNA concentrations over time (∼10 d) to assess how biophysical conditions influence eDNA persistence. We found that the presence of biofilm significantly increased initial decay rates relative to previous studies conducted in nonflowing microcosms, suggesting important differences in detection and persistence in lentic vs lotic systems. Lastly, by using a nested primer assay that targeted different size eDNA fragments, we found that fragment size altered both the estimated rate constant coefficients, as well as eDNA detectability over time. Larger fragments (>600 bp) were quickly degraded, while shorter fragments (<100 bp) remained detectable for the entirety of the experiment. When using eDNA as a stream monitoring tool, understanding environmental factors controlling eDNA degradation will be critical for optimizing eDNA sampling strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29995389     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages.

Authors:  Mei Shen; Nengwen Xiao; Ziyi Zhao; Ningning Guo; Zunlan Luo; Guang Sun; Junsheng Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Effects of turbulence fluctuation intensity in bioreactor of sewage treatment on physical and chemical properties of biofilms.

Authors:  Chao Luo; Lisha Guo; Shi Zeng; Tianyu Long
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Long distance (>20 km) downstream detection of endangered stream frogs suggests an important role for eDNA in surveying for remnant amphibian populations.

Authors:  Cecilia Villacorta-Rath; Conrad J Hoskin; Jan M Strugnell; Damien Burrows
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in an endangered sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) monitoring program.

Authors:  Dan Yu; Zhongyuan Shen; Tao Chang; Sha Li; Huanzhang Liu
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 6.  The Multiple States of Environmental DNA and What Is Known about Their Persistence in Aquatic Environments.

Authors:  Quentin Mauvisseau; Lynsey R Harper; Michael Sander; Robert H Hanner; Hannah Kleyer; Kristy Deiner
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental DNA decay.

Authors:  Philip D Lamb; Vera G Fonseca; David L Maxwell; Chibuzor C Nnanatu
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 8.678

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.