Literature DB >> 29994910

Tumor Grade Correlation Between Preoperative Biopsy and Final Surgical Specimen in Endometrial Cancer: The Use of Different Diagnostic Methods and Analysis of Associated Factors.

Víctor Lago, Belén Martín1, Esther Ballesteros1, José Miguel Cárdenas-Rebollo2, Lucas Minig3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the correlation between histology tumor grade of the preoperative biopsy using dilatation and curettage (D&C), Pipelle, or hysteroscopy and final surgical specimen in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients on whom a preoperative biopsy was performed between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed and cases with apparent early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer were included in the study. The accuracy of preoperative biopsy performed before hysterectomy using D&C, Pipelle, or hysteroscopy was compared.
RESULTS: A total of 332 patients were included. The diagnostic method was D&C in 43 cases (13%), Pipelle in 102 (31%), and hysteroscopy in 187 (56%). The preoperative diagnosis included G1 tumors in 177 cases (53.3%), G2 in 103 (31%), and G3 in 52 (15.6%). The surgical specimen confirmed endometrioid endometrial tumor in 309 patients (93%).The accuracy rates of preoperative biopsy and surgical specimen were 74.69%, 73.19%, and 89.75% for G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Hysteroscopy showed better κ index (κ = 0.551) than did D&C (κ = 0.392) and Pipelle (κ = 0.430). Tumor diameter greater than 30 mm was the only factor independently associated with absence of correlation between preoperative and postoperative tumor grade (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.959 [1.096-3.504], P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative biopsy, regardless of the method, has its limitations in predicting the tumor grade compared with final surgical specimen in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer at an apparent early stage. Concordance between the biopsy and hysterectomy specimen is less likely to happen in the case of preoperative G1 or G2 tumors, as well as in big tumors. Although hysteroscopy was associated with the highest tumor grade agreement, no differences in correlation between the 3 methods (D&C, Pipelle, and hysteroscopy) were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29994910     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Pattern of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: a Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  S Suchetha; Arun Peter Mathew; P Rema; Shaji Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  Preoperative evaluation of residual tumor in patients with endometrial carcinoma by using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Chunhua Wu; Ruohua Chen; Xiang Zhou; Qian Xia; Jianjun Liu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Quantitative Measurement of Progesterone Receptor Immunohistochemical Expression to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Yang Hsiao; Hung-Chun Fu; Chen-Hsuan Wu; Jui Lan; Yu-Che Ou; Ching-Chou Tsai; Hao Lin
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23

Review 5.  Accuracy of preoperative sampling diagnosis for predicting final pathology in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  David Lukanović; Miha Matjašič; Borut Kobal
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

6.  Impact of endometrial sampling technique and biopsy volume on the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Federico Ferrari; Sara Forte; Giulia Arrigoni; Laura Ardighieri; Maria Consuelo Coppola; Federica Salinaro; Fabio Barra; Enrico Sartori; Franco Odicino
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.