Literature DB >> 29993490

Force Closure Mechanism Modeling for Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation.

Andreas Geier, Harald Aschemann, Darryl D Lima, Christoph Woernle, Rainer Bader.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neuro-musculoskeletal multibody simulation (NMBS) seeks to optimize decision-making for patients with neuro-musculoskeletal disorders. In clinical practice, however, the inter-subject variability and the inaccessibility for experimental testing impede the reliable model identification. These limitations motivate the novel modeling approach termed as force closure mechanism modeling (FCM2).
METHODS: FCM 2 expresses the dynamics between mutually articulating joint partners with respect to instantaneous screw axes (ISA) automatically reconstructed from their relative velocity state. Thereby, FCM2 reduces arbitrary open-chain multibody topologies to force closure n-link pendulums. Within a computational validation study on the human knee joint with implemented contact surfaces, we examine FCM2 as an underlying inverse dynamic model for computed muscle control. We evaluate predicted tibiofemoral joint quantities, i.e., kinematics and contact forces along with muscle moment arms, during muscle-induced knee motion against the classic hinge joint model and experimental studies.
RESULTS: Our NMBS study provided the proof-of-principle of the novel modeling approach. FCM2 freed us from assuming a certain joint formulation while correctly predicting the joint dynamics in agreement with the established methods. Although experimental results were closely predicted, owing to noise in the ISA estimation, muscle moment arms were overestimated (RISA = 0.84 < RHINGE = 0.97, RMSEISA = 13.18 mm > RMSEHINGE = 6.54 mm), identifying the robust ISA estimation as key to FCM2.
CONCLUSION: FCM2 automatically derives the equations of motion in closed form. Moreover, it captures subject-specific joint function and, thereby, minimizes modeling and parameterization efforts. SIGNIFICANCE: Model derivation becomes driven by quantitative data available in clinical settings so that FCM2 yields a promising framework toward subject-specific NMBS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29993490     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2800293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  5 in total

Review 1.  The helical axis of anatomical joints: calculation methods, literature review, and software implementation.

Authors:  Andrea Ancillao
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Musculoskeletal Multibody Simulation Analysis on the Impact of Patellar Component Design and Positioning on Joint Dynamics after Unconstrained Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maeruan Kebbach; Martin Darowski; Sven Krueger; Christoph Schilling; Thomas M Grupp; Rainer Bader; Andreas Geier
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Effect of surgical parameters on the biomechanical behaviour of bicondylar total knee endoprostheses - A robot-assisted test method based on a musculoskeletal model.

Authors:  M Kebbach; R Grawe; A Geier; E Winter; P Bergschmidt; D Kluess; D D'Lima; C Woernle; R Bader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Estimating the Instantaneous Screw Axis and the Screw Axis Invariant Descriptor of Motion by Means of Inertial Sensors: An Experimental Study with a Mechanical Hinge Joint and Comparison to the Optoelectronic System.

Authors:  Andrea Ancillao; Maxim Vochten; Erwin Aertbeliën; Wilm Decré; Joris De Schutter
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The Influence of Mathematical Definitions on Patellar Kinematics Representations.

Authors:  Adrian Sauer; Maeruan Kebbach; Allan Maas; William M Mihalko; Thomas M Grupp
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.