OBJECTIVE: Myoelectric pattern recognition has been successfully applied as a human-machine interface to control robotic devices such as prostheses and exoskeletons, significantly improving the dexterity of myoelectric control. This study investigates the feasibility of applying myoelectric pattern recognition for controlling a robotic hand in stroke patients. METHODS: Myoelectric pattern recognition of six hand motion patterns was performed using forearm electromyogram signals in paretic side of eight stroke subjects. Both the random cross validation (RCV) and the chronological handout validation (CHV) were applied to assess the offline myoelectric pattern recognition performance. Experiments on real-time myoelectric pattern recognition control of an exoskeleton robotic hand were also performed. RESULTS: An average classification accuracy of 84.1% (the mean value from two different classifiers) and individual subject differences were observed in the offline myoelectric pattern recognition analysis using the RCV, while the accuracy decreased to 65.7% when the CHV was used. The stroke subjects achieved an average accuracy of 61.3 ± 20.9% for controlling the robotic hand. However, our study did not reveal a clear correlation between the real-time control accuracy and the offline myoelectric pattern recognition performance, or any specific characteristics of the stroke subjects. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that it is feasible to apply myoelectric pattern recognition to control the robotic hand in some but not all of the stroke patients. Each stroke subject should be individually online tested for the feasibility of applying myoelectric pattern recognition control for robot-assisted rehabilitation.
OBJECTIVE: Myoelectric pattern recognition has been successfully applied as a human-machine interface to control robotic devices such as prostheses and exoskeletons, significantly improving the dexterity of myoelectric control. This study investigates the feasibility of applying myoelectric pattern recognition for controlling a robotic hand in strokepatients. METHODS: Myoelectric pattern recognition of six hand motion patterns was performed using forearm electromyogram signals in paretic side of eight stroke subjects. Both the random cross validation (RCV) and the chronological handout validation (CHV) were applied to assess the offline myoelectric pattern recognition performance. Experiments on real-time myoelectric pattern recognition control of an exoskeleton robotic hand were also performed. RESULTS: An average classification accuracy of 84.1% (the mean value from two different classifiers) and individual subject differences were observed in the offline myoelectric pattern recognition analysis using the RCV, while the accuracy decreased to 65.7% when the CHV was used. The stroke subjects achieved an average accuracy of 61.3 ± 20.9% for controlling the robotic hand. However, our study did not reveal a clear correlation between the real-time control accuracy and the offline myoelectric pattern recognition performance, or any specific characteristics of the stroke subjects. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that it is feasible to apply myoelectric pattern recognition to control the robotic hand in some but not all of the strokepatients. Each stroke subject should be individually online tested for the feasibility of applying myoelectric pattern recognition control for robot-assisted rehabilitation.
Authors: Aaron Yurkewich; Illya J Kozak; Andrei Ivanovic; Daniel Rossos; Rosalie H Wang; Debbie Hebert; Alex Mihailidis Journal: J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Jessica Gantenbein; Jan Dittli; Jan Thomas Meyer; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy Journal: Front Neurorobot Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 2.650