Shanyue Sun1, Guangying Du1, Jiang Xue1, Jinbo Ma1, Minmin Ge1, Hongbo Wang1, Jingwei Tian1. 1. School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai, P.R. China.
Abstract
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which is highly expressed in human glioblastoma and involved in tumor immune escape and resistance to chemotherapy, is clinically correlated with tumor progression and poor clinical outcomes, and is a promising therapeutic target for glioblastoma. IDO inhibitors are marginally efficacious as single-agents; therefore, combination with other therapies holds promise for cancer therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-tumor effects and mechanisms of the IDO inhibitor PCC0208009 in combination with temozolomide. The effects of PCC0208009 on IDO activity inhibition, and mRNA and protein expression in HeLa cells were observed. In the mouse glioma GL261 heterotopic model, the effects of PCC0208009 on l-kynurenine/tryptophan (Kyn/Trp), tumor growth, flow cytometry for T cells within tumors, and immunohistochemistry for IDO and Ki67 were examined. In the rat glioma C6 orthotopic model, animal survival, flow cytometry for T cells within tumors, and immunohistochemistry for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and IDO were examined. The results show that PCC0208009 is a highly effective IDO inhibitor, not only directly inhibiting IDO activity but also participating in the gene regulation of IDO expression at the transcription and translation levels. PCC0208009 significantly enhanced the anti-tumor effects of temozolomide in GL261 and C6 models, by increasing the percentages of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells within tumors and suppressing tumor proliferation. These findings indicate that PCC0208009 can potentiate the anti-tumor efficacy of temozolomide and suggest that combination of IDO inhibitor-based immunotherapy with chemotherapy is a potential strategy for brain tumor treatment.
Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which is highly expressed in humanglioblastoma and involved in tumor immune escape and resistance to chemotherapy, is clinically correlated with tumor progression and poor clinical outcomes, and is a promising therapeutic target for glioblastoma. IDO inhibitors are marginally efficacious as single-agents; therefore, combination with other therapies holds promise for cancer therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-tumor effects and mechanisms of the IDO inhibitor PCC0208009 in combination with temozolomide. The effects of PCC0208009 on IDO activity inhibition, and mRNA and protein expression in HeLa cells were observed. In the mousegliomaGL261 heterotopic model, the effects of PCC0208009 on l-kynurenine/tryptophan (Kyn/Trp), tumor growth, flow cytometry for T cells within tumors, and immunohistochemistry for IDO and Ki67 were examined. In the ratglioma C6 orthotopic model, animal survival, flow cytometry for T cells within tumors, and immunohistochemistry for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and IDO were examined. The results show that PCC0208009 is a highly effective IDO inhibitor, not only directly inhibiting IDO activity but also participating in the gene regulation of IDO expression at the transcription and translation levels. PCC0208009 significantly enhanced the anti-tumor effects of temozolomide in GL261 and C6 models, by increasing the percentages of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells within tumors and suppressing tumor proliferation. These findings indicate that PCC0208009 can potentiate the anti-tumor efficacy of temozolomide and suggest that combination of IDO inhibitor-based immunotherapy with chemotherapy is a potential strategy for brain tumor treatment.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer.[1] Even after standard treatment, the prognosis of GBM remains poor, may due to the potently immunosuppressive tumor
environment.[2-4] Indoleamine
2,3-dioxygenase (IDO, also known as IDO1), a key enzyme in the metabolism of the
essential amino acid tryptophan (Trp) along the l-kynurenine (Kyn) pathway,
induces immune tolerance with local tryptophan depletion and produces toxic
tryptophan catabolites.[5] Recent studies show that IDO is highly expressed in humanglioblastoma,[6,7]
increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells, clinically correlates with drug
resistance, tumor progression, and poor clinical outcomes,[3,8,9] and suggest that IDO is a
promising therapeutic target for glioblastoma.[3,5] Several IDO inhibitors, such as
indoximod and PF-06840003, have been entered in phase 1/2 clinical trials for brain tumor therapy.In preclinical models, IDO inhibitors are only marginally efficacious as
single-agents and can enhance the anti-tumor effects of multiple classes of
chemotherapy agents.[10-12] Therefore, the
combination of IDO inhibitors with chemotherapy holds promise for cancer
therapy.[13,14] Temozolomide (TMZ) is a standard chemotherapeutic agent for
malignant glioma. Although TMZ improves the prognosis for patients with glioma, its
clinical efficacy is partial and limited. Many adjuvant therapies have been
evaluated for use with TMZ, but no further improvement in prognosis has been reported.[15]PCC0208009 (PCC) is an IDO inhibitor with a chemical structure as shown in Figure 1. It is the compound
of Example 1 in the Bristol-Myers Squibb Company patent (WO2015/031295 A1). The
studies in our laboratory have shown that PCC can effectively inhibit the activity
of IDO with an IC50 of 4.52 nM at the cellular level. There are no
previous reports on PCC. However, the efficacy and mechanisms of PCC at the cellular
level and in animal models remain to be elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study
was to investigate the underlying mechanisms for the effects of PCC on IDO, and the
anti-tumor functions of PCC combined with TMZ in mouse heterotopic transplantation
and rat orthotopic implantation glioma models.
Figure 1.
Chemical structure of PCC0208009.
Chemical structure of PCC0208009.
Methods
Chemicals and reagents
PCC was obtained from Shanghai Send Pharmaceutical, with purity >98.5%, the
molecular formula C29H35N7O and a molecular
weight of 487.6. For in vitro tests, PCC was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) and diluted with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) to the desired
concentration. For in vivo tests, PCC was reconstituted in aqueous 1% sodium
carboxymethyl cellulose (SCMC, w/v) to the desired concentrations. TMZ, produced
by Merck, was diluted to the appropriate concentrations with 1% SCMC.Phycoerythrin-Cyanine 7 (PE-Cy™7) hamster anti-mouseCD3e (Catalog No. 552774),
phycoerythrin (PE) rat anti-mouseCD4 (Catalog No. 553049), fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC) rat anti-mouseCD8a (Catalog No. 561966), FITCmouse
anti-rat CD3 (Catalog No. 557354), PE-Cy™5 mouse anti-ratCD4 (Catalog No.
554839), and PE mouse anti-ratCD8a (Catalog No. 554857) were all purchased from
BD Biosciences. Antibodies against rabbit anti-mouse/ratIDO (Catalog No.
ab106134), rabbit anti-ratproliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Catalog
No. ab15497), and rabbit anti-mouseKi67 (Catalog No. ab16667) were purchased
from Abcam. Rabbit anti-humanIDO antibody (Catalog No. #86630) was purchased
from Cell Signaling Technology. Mouse anti-human β-actin antibody (Catalog No.
AF0003), horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit and goat
anti-mouse IgG (H+L) were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology. A high-capacity
RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Catalog No.4387406) and Power SYBR® green PCR master
mixtures (Catalog No. 4367659) were purchased from Thermo Fisher. Tumor
dissociation kit (Catalog No. 130-096-730) was purchased from Miltenyi
Biotec.
Cell culture and animals
The mouseglioma cell line GL261 and ratglioma cell line C6 were provided by
Cell Bank, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The human cervical cancer cell line HeLa
was gifted by Dr Hongbo Wang at Yantai University. All cell lines were cultured
in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 IU/mL penicillin, and
50 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate and maintained at 37°C in a humidified air
atmosphere containing 5% CO2.Five-to-six weeks old male C57BL/6J mice and male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats
(weighed 200 ± 20 g) were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal
Technology. The animal production license number was SCXK (Jing) 2016-0011. The
animals were quarantined and equilibrated to the new environment for at least
5 days and maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment with free access
to sterilized food and water. The animal room was maintained on a 12 h
light/dark cycle at 21°C ± 5°C and 55% ± 15% relative humidity. All of the
experiments related to animals were performed in accordance with the Guidelines
for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals of the Experimental Animal Research
Committee in Yantai University.
Effects of PCC on the viability and proliferation of HeLa cells
HeLa cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 6 × 103 cells/well.
After culture for 10–12 h, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium
with 100 ng/mL interferon gamma (IFN-γ), or PCC at 25, 50, 100, or 200 nM with
or without 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, and medium containing 0.1% DMSO was used as the
vehicle treatment. At 72 h after the addition of drugs, cell viability and
proliferation were observed. In the viability assay, adherent cells were washed,
trypsinized, and counted using a CountStar IC1000 Automated Cell Counter
(Ruiyu-Biotech), and viability of the counted cells was confirmed by 0.1% trypan
blue exclusion, which was indicated as a percentage of the living cells. In the
proliferation test, cells were assayed using the
3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method. The
cell proliferation rate of control cells was represented as 100%, and the
relative cell proliferation rates of the other groups were calculated.
Inhibition effects of PCC on IDO activity in HeLa cells
HeLa cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 6 × 103 cells/well. After
culture for 10–12 h, the medium was replaced with fresh medium only or medium
containing 100 ng/mL IFN-γ. Except for the vehicle group, the other groups were
all induced by IFN-γ for 24 h. Then, the medium was replaced with fresh medium
only, medium containing 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, or containing 100 nM PCC. At 0.5, 1, 2,
5, 10, 24, 48, and 72 h after the addition of drugs, the cell supernatants were
harvested for determination of l-kynurenine (Kyn) and tryptophan (Trp)
by liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
Effects of PCC on IDO expression in HeLa cells
HeLa cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well. After
culture for 10–12 h, the medium was replaced with fresh medium, 100 ng/mL IFN-γ,
or 100 ng/mL IFN-γ plus PCC at 50, 100, and 200 nM, respectively. After
incubation for 48 h, cells were harvested. The expression of IDO at the protein
and mRNA levels was detected by Western blot and quantitative real-time
polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), respectively.Western blot was performed as described previously.[16] Proteins were extracted from the harvested cells using radio
immunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer. The cell lysates containing 50 μg
protein were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The
membrane was blocked for 2 h at room temperature with tris-buffered saline
containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBS-T) and 5% skimmed milk, and then, incubated with
rabbit anti-human monoclonal antibody against IDO (1:1000), followed by
incubation with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:2000) for 2 h. Finally,
the protein levels were detected using BeyoECL Plus reagent and exposed to the
film. Normalization of results was ensured by running a parallel Western blot
with the β-actin antibody used as an internal control. The optical density was
quantified using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software.In the qRT-PCR assay, the total RNA was extracted from the harvested cells. Then,
reverse transcription to cDNA was performed using SuperScript® III
reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturers’ instructions. qRT-PCR was
performed using SYBR Green MasterMix on an ABI Prism 7500 fast system
(PerkinElmer) under the following amplification parameters: 95°C for 10 min,
(95°C, 15 s; 60°C, 15 s; 72°C, 30 s) ×40 cycles, 72°C for 6 min, and
2-ΔΔΔCt was used for statistical analysis of results. Relative
expression was normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
The primers used in this experiment were as follows: IDO1 forward:
5′-GCCCTTCAAGTGTTTCACCAA-3′; IDO1 reverse: 5′-CCAGCCAGACAAATATATGCGA-3′; GAPDH
forward: 5′-GGTCGGAGTCAACGGATTTG-3′; GAPDH reverse:
5′-ATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTCCAT-3′.
Mouse glioma GL261 heterotopic transplantation model
Five-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the dorsal
scapula with 0.2 mL of Matrigel containing 3 × 106 cells under
ketamine–xylazine anesthesia. The day of tumor inoculation was designated day 1.
Tumor width (W) and length (L) of xenografts were measured by Vernier caliper,
and tumor volume (TV) was calculated according to the formula:
V = 0.5 × L × W2.
Effects on the pharmacodynamic biomarker Kyn/Trp
When the tumor volumes reached approximately 300–400 mm3, the mice
were intragastrically (i.g.) administered a single dose of PCC at 100 mg/kg.
At 0, 2, 4, and 8 h after administration, plasma and tumor were collected
for the detection of Trp, Kyn, and PCC, with five animals per time point.
Trp, Kyn, and PCC were all measured by LC-MS/MS.
Anti-tumor effects of PCC in combination with TMZ
When the tumors reached approximately 100 mm3, the mice were
randomized into four groups: Vehicle, PCC, TMZ, and PCC plus TMZ; each group
contained 10 mice. PCC was i.g. administered at 100 mg/kg twice daily, TMZ
was i.g. administered at 100 mg/kg once every 2 days, and the vehicle group
was i.g. administered 1% SCMC twice daily. The dosing volume was
0.1 mL/10 g. During the study, the body weight of animals and tumor volumes
were measured once every 3 or 5 days. At the end of the study, tumors were
collected and quickly weighed. The mean tumor weight (MTW) in each group was
obtained. The inhibition rate (IR in %) was calculated by the following
formula: IR
(%) = [(MTWvehicle − MTWtreatment)/MTWvehicle] × 100.
Five tumors were randomly selected for flow cytometry analysis, and three
tumors were randomly selected for immunohistochemical detection.
Flow cytometry analysis
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were harvested from tumors using tumor
dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the instructions. Red blood
cell lysis working solution was added to the cell suspensions to remove
erythrocytes and incubated for 15 min, the cells were centrifuged at
300g for 10 min, and then washed and
adjusted to 107 cells/mL with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Three-color staining of lymphocytes was performed with PE-Cy™7-CD3e, PE-CD4,
and FITC-CD8a using standard staining methods. FACS analysis was performed
with Accuri™ C6 Flow Cytometer running CFlow Plus software.
Immunohistochemical staining
The tumors were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution, processed, and
embedded in paraffin, and the tumor sections (4 µm) were processed for
immunohistochemical staining for IDO and Ki67 as described previously.[17] Briefly, sections were blocked with 3% normal goat serum and 0.1%
Triton X-100, and incubated with antibodies against IDO (1:100) and Ki67
(1:200) overnight at 4°C; sections were then incubated with the biotinylated
secondary antibody for 30 min, followed by avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex
for 45 min at 37°C. Immunoreactivity signals were developed with 0.05%
diaminobenzidine in Tris-HCl buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.6) containing 0.03%
H2O2. Protein positive cells were stained brown in
the cytoplasm. Sections were then mounted and examined under high-power
microscope (200×), and each specimens was randomly selected for three vision
test areas as the total area. The positive expressions for IDO and Ki67 were
analyzed by the IPP software. The positive area of the protein expression
was defined as follows: The integrated optical density (IOD) = the positive
area × the average optical density.
Rat glioma C6 orthotopic implantation model
SD rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with 10% chloral hydrate
(0.35–0.5 mL/100 g) and immobilized with a stereotactic frame for tumor
implantation. A 0.6-mm-diameter bur hole was drilled at 3 mm right lateral and
1 mm anterior to the bregma. With antiseptic technique, 106 cells in
8 µL PBS were stereotactically implanted into the caudate nucleus using a
Hamilton syringe at a depth of 5 mm from the dura mater. The day of tumor
inoculation was designated day 1. Animals were used in the experiments on day
5.
Distribution of PCC in the rat brain
After tumor inoculation for 15 days, rats were i.g. administered a single
dose of PCC at 50 mg/kg. At 0.5, 2.5, and 6.5 h after dosing, the cerebrum
and cerebellum were harvested for detection of PCC content using
LC-MS/MS.
Animal survival study
According to the body weight, animals were randomly divided into four groups:
Vehicle, PCC, TMZ, and PCC plus TMZ. Each group contained 10 animals. PCC
was i.g. administered at 50 mg/kg twice daily, TMZ was i.g. administered at
50 mg/kg once every 2 days, and the vehicle group was i.g. administered with
1% SCMC twice daily, from day 5 to day 35. The dosing volume was
0.2 mL/100 g. During the study, the body weight was measured twice every
week and the survival times of rats were recorded and analyzed. Animals were
kept in the study until the rats were dead or dying.
Flow cytometry and immunohistochemical staining
In this experiment, the grouping, dose, and route of administration were the
same as described in the section “Animal survival study.” The differences
were that the animals in this study were treated from day 5 to day 26, and
each group contained 10 animals. At the end of treatment, tumors from five
rats were sampled for flow cytometry analysis, and tumors from three rats
were sampled for immunohistochemical detection. T lymphocytes from the
tumors were prepared as described above. Three-color staining of lymphocytes
was performed with FITC-CD3, PE-Cy™5-CD4, and PE-CD8a. The tumors were
immunohistochemically stained for PCNA and IDO, and brains from normal rats
were also immunohistochemically stained for PCNA.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The data were analyzed by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-tests for paired
groups or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for three or more groups.
Survival time was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method in each treated group
and compared by the logrank test.
Results
Effect of PCC on the viability and proliferation of HeLa cells
The viability and proliferation of HeLa cells were examined after cells were
treated with IFN-γ and PCC alone, or PCC plus IFN-γ. The results of the
viability assay are shown in Figure 2(a); the percentages of living cells in the PCC and IFN-γ
alone groups or in the combination treated groups had no significant differences
compared with the vehicle group (P > 0.05). The
results of the proliferation test are shown in Figure 2(b); the IRs in PCC and IFN-γ
alone or in combination treated groups also showed no significant differences
compared with the vehicle group (P > 0.05),
with IRs less than 8%. These results indicated that 25–200 nM PCC or/and
100 ng/mL IFN-γ had no obvious effects on the viability and proliferation of
HeLa cells.
Figure 2.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) on HeLa cells and IDO activity and expression
in vitro. HeLa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, or PCC at
25–200 nM with or without 100 ng/mL IFN-γ. The viability (a) and
proliferation (b) of cells were observed 72 h after the addition of
drugs. HeLa cells were induced by IFN-γ for 24 h and then treated with
100 ng/mL IFN-γ or 100 nM PCC. At different time points after the
addition of drugs, Kyn and Trp in the supernatants were determined by
liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry, and Kyn/Trp was
calculated (c). HeLa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, or
100 ng/mL IFN-γ plus PCC at 50, 100, and 200 nM. After incubation for
48 h, the expression of IDO was detected by Western blot for the protein
level (d and e) and qRT-PCR for the mRNA level (f). All experiments were
repeated three times. *P < 0.05,
compared with the vehicle group. #P < 0.05, compared with the IFN-γ group.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) on HeLa cells and IDO activity and expression
in vitro. HeLa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, or PCC at
25–200 nM with or without 100 ng/mL IFN-γ. The viability (a) and
proliferation (b) of cells were observed 72 h after the addition of
drugs. HeLa cells were induced by IFN-γ for 24 h and then treated with
100 ng/mL IFN-γ or 100 nM PCC. At different time points after the
addition of drugs, Kyn and Trp in the supernatants were determined by
liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry, and Kyn/Trp was
calculated (c). HeLa cells were treated with 100 ng/mL IFN-γ, or
100 ng/mL IFN-γ plus PCC at 50, 100, and 200 nM. After incubation for
48 h, the expression of IDO was detected by Western blot for the protein
level (d and e) and qRT-PCR for the mRNA level (f). All experiments were
repeated three times. *P < 0.05,
compared with the vehicle group. #P < 0.05, compared with the IFN-γ group.
Effect of PCC on IDO activity and expression in HeLa cells
IDO is highly expressed in HeLa cells induced by IFN-γ, which is widely used for
activity screening of IDO inhibitors. After 10–20 h induction with 100 ng/mL
IFN-γ, IDO was observed to be highly expressed in HeLa cells by Kyn/Trp
determination. The IDO inhibition effects of PCC in HeLa cells were detected
after 24 h induction with IFN-γ in this study. As shown in Figure 2(c), IDO activity (Kyn/Trp) was
maintained at a high level in the IFN-γ group, and was
highly expressed 10 h later. In the
PCC group, the activity of IDO was effectively inhibited to the level of the
vehicle group, from the drug addition to at least 72 h.HeLa cells were treated with IFN-γ or IFN-γ plus PCC for 48 h, and the
expressions of IDO at protein and mRNA levels were detected. The results from
Western blot analysis are shown in Figure 2(d) and (e); the expression levels of IDO protein
were almost undetectable in the vehicle group, but were significantly increased
by IFN-γ treatment. The IDO protein expression induced by IFN-γ was
dose-dependently suppressed by PCC, which showed significant differences at 100
and 200 nM (P < 0.05). The results from qRT-PCR
are shown in Figure
2(f); IDO mRNA was expressed at low levels
in the vehicle group and was significantly increased by IFN-γ treatment compared
with the vehicle group (P < 0.05). The IDO mRNA
expression induced by IFN-γ was dose-dependently suppressed by PCC, which showed
significant differences at all doses compared with the IFN-γ group (P < 0.05).
PCC on Kyn/Trp in GL261 subcutaneous mouse model
To investigate the biochemical mechanism of PCC in vivo, mouse model bearing
GL261 were generated. The levels of the pharmacodynamic biomarkers Kyn/Trp and
PCC in the plasma and tumors were determined at different time points after mice
were i.g. administered a single dose of PCC at 100 mg/kg. As shown in Figure 3(a), PCC was
highly distributed in the tumors and plasma. Compared to pre-dose (0 h), the
ratios of Kyn/Trp in the tumor and plasma samples were all significantly
decreased from 2 to 8 h after drug administration (P < 0.05) (Figure 3(b)).
Figure 3.
Anti-tumor effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on GL261 tumor-bearing
mice: (a, b) Mice were i.g. administered a single dose of PCC at
100 mg/kg. At 0, 2, 4, and 8 h after dosing, plasma and the tumor were
collected for determination of PCC and Kyn/Trp (n = 5). *P < 0.05, compared with the values at 0 h.
(c–e) Mice were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily),
PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC
plus TMZ, n = 10. During the study, the body weight of animals and tumor
volumes were measured once every 5 days and once every 3/4 days: (c)
body weight curve, (d) tumor growth curve, and (e) mean tumor weight.
*P < 0.05, compared with the
vehicle group; #P < 0.05,
compared with the PCC group; &P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ group.
Anti-tumor effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on GL261tumor-bearing
mice: (a, b) Mice were i.g. administered a single dose of PCC at
100 mg/kg. At 0, 2, 4, and 8 h after dosing, plasma and the tumor were
collected for determination of PCC and Kyn/Trp (n = 5). *P < 0.05, compared with the values at 0 h.
(c–e) Mice were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily),
PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC
plus TMZ, n = 10. During the study, the body weight of animals and tumor
volumes were measured once every 5 days and once every 3/4 days: (c)
body weight curve, (d) tumor growth curve, and (e) mean tumor weight.
*P < 0.05, compared with the
vehicle group; #P < 0.05,
compared with the PCC group; &P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ group.
Combinatorial treatment with PCC and TMZ on GL261 subcutaneous mouse
model
To explore the anti-tumor effects and mechanisms of PCC in combination with TMZ
on tumor growth in vivo, mouseGL261 subcutaneous model was prepared. Mice were
treated with Vehicle, PCC, TMZ, or PCC plus TMZ. The body weights of animals and
the volumes and weights of tumors were measured. Tumor samples were analyzed by
flow cytometry for T cell populations and were immunohistochemically examined
for IDO and Ki67 expression.
Body weights of tumor-bearing mice
As shown in Figure
3(c) and Table 1, compared with the vehicle group, no significant effects
on the body weight of animals were observed in the PCC group during the
study (P > 0.05). From day 12 and day 16 to
the end of this study, mouse body weights in the TMZ and PCC plus TMZ groups
were noted to have significant decreases compared with the vehicle group
(P < 0.05). The body weight decreased
by 12.56% and 12.66% in the TMZ group and PCC plus TMZ group, respectively,
compared to that at the beginning of the study (P < 0.05). However, no decrease in body weight was observed
between the PCC plus TMZ group and the TMZ group (P > 0.05), indicating that PCC did not increase the side
effects of TMZ.
Table 1.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on body weights and GL261 tumor
weights.
Groups
Body weight
(g)
Pre-treatment (day
11)
Post-treatment (day
28)
Weight gain
(%)
Tumor weight
(g)
Inhibition rate
(%)
Vehicle
23.06 ± 1.33
24.23 ± 2.32
5.07
0.432 ± 0.21
−
PCC
23.75 ± 1.25
23.83 ± 1.82
0.34
0.248 ± 0.15[*]
42.59
TMZ
22.62 ± 1.74
19.78 ± 2.92[&]
−12.56
0.203 ± 0.17[*]
53.01
PCC + TMZ
22.99 ± 1.37
20.08 ± 2.24[&]
−12.66
0.126 ± 0.06[*][#][&]
70.83
TMZ: temozolomide.
Mice were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily),
PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every two
days), or PCC plus TMZ, n=10. The percentage of body weight gain
was calculated based on that at the beginning of study. Tumor
weights were observed on day 28, and the inhibition rate of
tumor weight was calculated. *P
< 0.05, compared with the vehicle group; #P < 0.05, compared with the PCC
group;
P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ
group.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on body weights and GL261tumor
weights.TMZ: temozolomide.Mice were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily),
PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every two
days), or PCC plus TMZ, n=10. The percentage of body weight gain
was calculated based on that at the beginning of study. Tumor
weights were observed on day 28, and the inhibition rate of
tumor weight was calculated. *P
< 0.05, compared with the vehicle group; #P < 0.05, compared with the PCC
group;P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ
group.
Tumor volume and tumor weight
The suppression of tumor growth was observed in the PCC, TMZ and PCC plus TMZ
groups, and PCC combined with TMZ showed stronger suppression of tumor
growth than PCC or TMZ alone (Figure 3(d)). At the end of the
study, the mean tumor weights in PCC, TMZ, and combinatorial treatment
groups were obviously smaller than those in the vehicle group (P < 0.05), and the tumor IRs were 42.59%,
53.01%, and 70.83%, respectively (Figure 3(e) and Table 1). No
significant difference in tumor weight was observed between the PCC group
and TMZ group (P > 0.05). The mean tumor
weights in the PCC plus TMZ group were less than those in the PCC and TMZ
groups (P < 0.05).
T cell subtypes in GL261 tumor
To understand the immunological changes in animals treated with PCC and TMZ,
T cell populations within tumors were analyzed. As shown in Figure 4(a) and (b), compared with the
vehicle group, the percentages of CD3+, CD4+, and
CD8+ T cells in the PCC group were noted to have slight
increases (P > 0.05) while there were
significant decreases in the TMZ group (P < 0.05). In the PCC plus TMZ group, the percentage of
CD3+ cells was significantly higher than those in the vehicle
and TMZ groups (P < 0.05), and the
percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ were higher than those in
the vehicle group (P > 0.05) and
significantly higher than those in the TMZ group (P < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) on T cell subtypes and expressions of IDO
and Ki67 within GL261 tumors. Mice were i.g. administered with
Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ
(100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, n = 10. On day 28,
five tumors from each group were analyzed by flow cytometry with
PE-Cy™7-CD3e, PE-CD4, and FITC-CD8a. Three tumors from each group
were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis for Ki67 and IDO
expression: (a) representative flow graphs, (b) results of T cell
populations. (c and d) Ki67 detection and (e and f) IDO detection.
*P < 0.05 compared with the
vehicle group, #P < 0.05
compared with the TMZ group.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) on T cell subtypes and expressions of IDO
and Ki67 within GL261tumors. Mice were i.g. administered with
Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (100 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ
(100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, n = 10. On day 28,
five tumors from each group were analyzed by flow cytometry with
PE-Cy™7-CD3e, PE-CD4, and FITC-CD8a. Three tumors from each group
were analyzed by immunohistochemical analysis for Ki67 and IDO
expression: (a) representative flow graphs, (b) results of T cell
populations. (c and d) Ki67 detection and (e and f) IDO detection.
*P < 0.05 compared with the
vehicle group, #P < 0.05
compared with the TMZ group.
IDO and Ki67 expression in GL261 tumor
Immunohistochemical detection was carried out to observe the changes in IDO
and Ki67 expression in GL261tumors. The Ki67 protein is a cellular marker
for proliferation.[18] As shown in Figure
4(c) and (d), Ki67 expression was noted at a high level in the vehicle
group. Considerable decreases in Ki67 expression were observed in the PCC
and TMZ groups (P > 0.05), and a
significant decrease was observed in the PCC plus TMZ group compared to the
vehicle group (P < 0.05). There was no
significant difference in Ki67 expression between the TMZ and PCC groups
(P > 0.05). The expression of IDO is
shown in Figure 4(e)
and (f). The high
expression level of IDO was observed in GL261tumors in the vehicle group,
while IDO expression in the PCC group was significantly decreased (P < 0.05).
Combinatorial treatment with PCC and TMZ on C6 orthotopic rat model
The syngeneic intracranial orthotopic model of ratglioma C6 were prepared by
implanting tumor cells into the caudate nucleus of SD rats. The day of tumor
inoculation was designated day 1.
Distribution of PCC in rat brain
At 15 days after tumor inoculation, the rats were i.g. administered a single
dose of PCC at 50 mg/kg, and the cerebrum and cerebellum were harvested for
the detection of PCC content. The PCC contents in the cerebrum and
cerebellum were 122.3 and 113.7 nM/g at 0.5 h, 70.6 and 63.5 nM/g at 2.5 h,
32.8 and 34.3 nM/g at 6.5 h, respectively. These results indicated that PCC
could cross the blood-brain barrier and distribute into the brain.
Animal survival and body weights
The animal survival curve is shown in Figure 5(a). No significant
prolongation in animal survival was observed in the PCC or TMZ groups
compared with the vehicle group (P > 0.05).
Animal survival in the PCC plus TMZ group was significantly prolonged than
compared with the vehicle group (P < 0.05)
and compared with the PCC and TMZ groups (P < 0.05).
Figure 5.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on survival of C6-bearing rats
and T cell subtypes within tumors. Rats were i.g. administered with
Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (50 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ
(50 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, from day 5 to day
35, n = 10. The survival time and body weight of animals were
recorded and analyzed. Animals were treated from day 5 to day 28
according to the above protocol, tumor from 5 rats were analyzed by
flow cytometry with mouse anti-rat FITC-CD3, PE-Cy™5-CD4, and
PE-CD8a: (a) animal survival curve, (b) body weights of animals, (c)
representative flow graphs, and (d) results of T cell populations.
*P < 0.05 compared with the
vehicle group; #P < 0.05
compared with the TMZ group.
Effects of PCC0208009 (PCC) and TMZ on survival of C6-bearing rats
and T cell subtypes within tumors. Rats were i.g. administered with
Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (50 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ
(50 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, from day 5 to day
35, n = 10. The survival time and body weight of animals were
recorded and analyzed. Animals were treated from day 5 to day 28
according to the above protocol, tumor from 5 rats were analyzed by
flow cytometry with mouse anti-ratFITC-CD3, PE-Cy™5-CD4, and
PE-CD8a: (a) animal survival curve, (b) body weights of animals, (c)
representative flow graphs, and (d) results of T cell populations.
*P < 0.05 compared with the
vehicle group; #P < 0.05
compared with the TMZ group.As shown in Figure
5(b), compared with the vehicle group, no significant effects on
the body weight of rats were observed in the PCC group during the study
(P > 0.05); from day 8 to the end of
this study and from day 8 to day 21, rat body weights in the TMZ group and
PCC plus TMZ group were noted to show significant decreases (P < 0.05). However, no additional decrease in
body weight was observed between the PCC plus TMZ group and the TMZ group
(P > 0.05), indicating that PCC did not
increase the side effects of TMZ in this model.
T cell subtypes in C6 tumor
To understand the immunological mechanisms of underlying the anti-tumor
effects of PCC and combinatorial treatment of PCC and TMZ, T cell
populations within tumors were analyzed. As shown in Figure 5(c) and (d), compared with the vehicle group,
the percentages of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T
cells in the PCC group were increased, ranging from 40% to 70%, and were
slightly decreased in the TMZ group. In the PCC plus TMZ group, the
percentages of CD3+, CD8+, and CD4+ T cells
were significantly increased compared with the vehicle and TMZ groups by
approximately about twofold.
PCNA and IDO expression in C6 tumor by immunohistochemistry
The results from immunohistochemical staining are shown in Figure 6. PCNA
expression is a useful prognostic and diagnostic biomarker for gliomas.[19] The expression of PCNA was very low in the brain tissue and highly
expressed in the tumor of the vehicle group (Figure 6(a)). Compared with the
vehicle group, PCNA in the PCC, TMZ, and PCC plus TMZ groups was
significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The
PCNA in the PCC plus TMZ group was significantly decreased compared to the
PCC and TMZ groups (P < 0.05). IDO
expression in the PCC group was significantly decreased in the C6 tumor
compared with that in the vehicle group (P < 0.05) (Figure 6(b)).
Figure 6.
Immunohistochemical detection for PCNA and IDO expression in C6
tumors. Rats were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice
daily), PCC (50 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (50 mg/kg, once every
2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, from day 5 to day 35. Brain from normal
rats and tumor from three rats in each group were
immunohistochemically stained for PCNA or IDO. *P < 0.05 compared with the vehicle group;
#P < 0.05 compared
with the PCC group; &P < 0.05 compared with the TMZ group. Mice were i.g.
administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (100 mg/kg,
twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ,
n = 10. The percentage of body weight gain was calculated based on
that at the beginning of study. Tumor weights were observed on day
28, and the inhibition rate of tumor weight was calculated. *P < 0.05, compared with the vehicle
group; #P < 0.05,
compared with the PCC group; &P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ group.
Immunohistochemical detection for PCNA and IDO expression in C6
tumors. Rats were i.g. administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice
daily), PCC (50 mg/kg, twice daily), TMZ (50 mg/kg, once every
2 days), or PCC plus TMZ, from day 5 to day 35. Brain from normal
rats and tumor from three rats in each group were
immunohistochemically stained for PCNA or IDO. *P < 0.05 compared with the vehicle group;
#P < 0.05 compared
with the PCC group; &P < 0.05 compared with the TMZ group. Mice were i.g.
administered with Vehicle (1% SCMC, twice daily), PCC (100 mg/kg,
twice daily), TMZ (100 mg/kg, once every 2 days), or PCC plus TMZ,
n = 10. The percentage of body weight gain was calculated based on
that at the beginning of study. Tumor weights were observed on day
28, and the inhibition rate of tumor weight was calculated. *P < 0.05, compared with the vehicle
group; #P < 0.05,
compared with the PCC group; &P < 0.05, compared with the TMZ group.
Discussion
The clinical responses to most immunotherapy strategies are poor, mainly due to the
immunosuppressive network within the local tumor microenvironment.[20] IDO is a key immunosuppressive enzyme that modulates the anti-tumor immune
response by promoting regulatory T cell generation and blocking effector T cell
activation. Targeting IDO is a promising approach that may reverse the complex
process of immune escape and induce a potent anti-tumor response. However, in
preclinical models of cancer, single-agent therapy with IDO inhibitor showed modest
anti-tumor activity. Therefore, combination IDO inhibitors incorporating other tumor
therapies including chemotherapy will be required for maximal therapeutic
benefit.PCC is an effective IDO inhibitor, yet whether it has cytotoxic activity is unknown.
In vitro experiments indicated that PCC had no effect on the viability and
proliferation of HeLa cells, regardless of whether they were treated with IFN-γ.
Other experiments also indicated that PCC up to 10 μM had no obvious direct
cytotoxic activity against common tumor cell lines (data not shown). After induction
with IFN-γ, IDO activity was highly increased in HeLa cells, which could be
effectively inhibited to normal levels by PCC, lasted for at least 72 h, and other
IDO inhibitors also inhibited IDO activity, but the maintenance time was much
shorter, less than 36 h. Based on this result, we speculated that PCC affects IDO
expression in HeLa cells. The results from Western blot and qRT-PCR analyses showed
that PCC significantly decreased IDO expression induced by the IFN-γ at the protein
and mRNA levels. In the study of mouseGL261 and rat C6 models, PCC decreased the
expression of IDO protein in tumors. The above results indicated that PCC was
related to the regulation of IDO expression at the transcription and translation
levels. However, the mechanistic basis for this inhibition is not yet clear, and
further studies are needed.The activity of IDO can be estimated by measuring serum Kyn concentrations or
Kyn/Trp.[12,21] The IDO inhibitory effects of PCC in vivo were evaluated in
mouse model bearing GL261. Kyn/Trp in the tumor and plasma was significantly
decreased after drug administration. The trend and extent were comparable between
the tumor and plasma, and Kyn/Trp could serve as a biomarker for the therapeutic
activity of PCC or other IDO inhibitors.The anti-tumor functions of PCC combined with TMZ were
evaluated in the mouseGL261 and rat C6 models. PCC in combination with TMZ
significantly suppressed tumor growth and prolonged animal survival and enhanced anti-tumor effects. This could be reflected by
Ki67 and PCNA expression. Ki67 protein and PCNA are useful markers for cell
proliferation. PCC in combination with TMZ could significantly decrease the
expression of these two markers, indicating that combinatorial treatment could more
effectively inhibit tumor cell proliferation.In the study of T cell populations and immunohistochemical staining, TMZ, as a
cytotoxic drug, showed decreased effects on all subtypes within tumors, indicating
that TMZ also killed T cells when it killed the tumor cells; this might be a reason
for drug resistance and relapse. PCC alone slightly increased the percentages of T
cells within tumors but significantly increased them when in combination with TMZ.
This indicated tha PCC and TMZ could more effectively increase the proportion of T
cells in tumor. However, the mechanistic basis for the enhancement of anti-tumor effect was not clear, though it is
speculated that TMZ could promote the release of tumor antigens by killing tumor
cells, and PCC could reverse the immune tolerance of the tumor microenvironment,
with these two factors interacting to enhance the anti-tumor immune responses.In summary, PCC is a highly effective IDO inhibitor that not only directly inhibits
the IDO activity but also participates in the regulation of IDO expression at the
transcription and translation levels. PCC0208009 combined with TMZ enhanced the anti-tumor effects in animal models by
increasing the percentages of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+
T cells within tumor and suppressing tumor proliferation. These findings suggest
that the combination of IDO inhibitor-based immunotherapy with chemotherapy is a
potential strategy for brain tumor treatment.
Authors: Alexander J Muller; James B DuHadaway; P Scott Donover; Erika Sutanto-Ward; George C Prendergast Journal: Nat Med Date: 2005-02-13 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Derek A Wainwright; Irina V Balyasnikova; Alan L Chang; Atique U Ahmed; Kyung-Sub Moon; Brenda Auffinger; Alex L Tobias; Yu Han; Maciej S Lesniak Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lijie Zhai; Erik Ladomersky; Kristen L Lauing; Meijing Wu; Matthew Genet; Galina Gritsina; Balázs Győrffy; Priscilla K Brastianos; David C Binder; Jeffrey A Sosman; Francis J Giles; Charles D James; Craig Horbinski; Roger Stupp; Derek A Wainwright Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Lijie Zhai; April Bell; Erik Ladomersky; Kristen L Lauing; Lakshmi Bollu; Jeffrey A Sosman; Bin Zhang; Jennifer D Wu; Stephen D Miller; Joshua J Meeks; Rimas V Lukas; Eugene Wyatt; Lynn Doglio; Gary E Schiltz; Robert H McCusker; Derek A Wainwright Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 8.786