Malin Björkander1, Peter Bentzer1,2, Ulf Schött1,3, Marcus E Broman1,3, Thomas Kander1,3. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden. 3. Department of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incidence and risk factors for complications after insertion of central venous catheters have previously been reported for smaller cohorts. The aim of this observational multicenter study was to study risk factors for mechanical complications in a large, recently collected cohort of patients. METHODS: Records of central venous catheter insertions from 8 hospitals in southern Sweden from 2013 to 2016 were collected from the regional chart system. Data on blood coagulation tests, use of ultrasonography, central venous catheter location, bore size, number of needle passes, arterial puncture, the chronological order of the central venous catheter insertion, and mechanical complications were extracted. Only one insertion/patient was included using worst-case selection criteria. Predefined primary outcome was mechanical complications defined as bleeding, pneumothorax, nerve injury, or malignant arrhythmia. Severe mechanical complications were defined as bleeding requiring intervention or transfusion, pneumothorax, persistent nerve injury, or non-self-limiting arrhythmias. RESULTS: We included 10 949 insertions and identified 118 (1.1%) incidents of mechanical complication, of which 85 (0.8%) were bleedings, 21 (0.2%) were pneumothoraces, 7 (0.06%) were transient nerve injuries, and 5 (0.05%) were self-limiting arrhythmias. Severe mechanical complications occurred in 23 (0.2%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, multicenter observational study on 10 949 central venous catheter insertions, mechanical complications were rare. Preprocedural coagulopathy, number of needle passes, and arterial puncture were associated with grade 2-4 bleeding. Subclavian vein insertions, arterial puncture, and chronological order of the central venous catheter insertion were associated with pneumothorax.
BACKGROUND: Incidence and risk factors for complications after insertion of central venous catheters have previously been reported for smaller cohorts. The aim of this observational multicenter study was to study risk factors for mechanical complications in a large, recently collected cohort of patients. METHODS: Records of central venous catheter insertions from 8 hospitals in southern Sweden from 2013 to 2016 were collected from the regional chart system. Data on blood coagulation tests, use of ultrasonography, central venous catheter location, bore size, number of needle passes, arterial puncture, the chronological order of the central venous catheter insertion, and mechanical complications were extracted. Only one insertion/patient was included using worst-case selection criteria. Predefined primary outcome was mechanical complications defined as bleeding, pneumothorax, nerve injury, or malignant arrhythmia. Severe mechanical complications were defined as bleeding requiring intervention or transfusion, pneumothorax, persistent nerve injury, or non-self-limiting arrhythmias. RESULTS: We included 10 949 insertions and identified 118 (1.1%) incidents of mechanical complication, of which 85 (0.8%) were bleedings, 21 (0.2%) were pneumothoraces, 7 (0.06%) were transient nerve injuries, and 5 (0.05%) were self-limiting arrhythmias. Severe mechanical complications occurred in 23 (0.2%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, multicenter observational study on 10 949 central venous catheter insertions, mechanical complications were rare. Preprocedural coagulopathy, number of needle passes, and arterial puncture were associated with grade 2-4 bleeding. Subclavian vein insertions, arterial puncture, and chronological order of the central venous catheter insertion were associated with pneumothorax.
Authors: Marc Ghannoum; Darren M Roberts; David S Goldfarb; Jesper Heldrup; Kurt Anseeuw; Tais F Galvao; Thomas D Nolin; Robert S Hoffman; Valery Lavergne; Paul Meyers; Sophie Gosselin; Tudor Botnaru; Karine Mardini; David M Wood Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 10.614
Authors: Maria Adrian; Ola Borgquist; Peter Bentzer; Jonas Åkeson; Martin Spångfors; Jonas Wrigstad; Anders Holmström; Rikard Linnér; Thomas Kander Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Yan Bo Chen; Hao Shi Bao; Ting Ting Hu; Zhou He; Biaolin Wen; Feng Tao Liu; Feng Xi Su; He Ran Deng; Jian Nan Wu Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Becem Trabelsi; Zied Hajjej; Dhouha Drira; Azza Yedes; Iheb Labbene; Mustapha Ferjani; Mechaal Ben Ali Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 10.318
Authors: Josée Bouchard; Greene Shepherd; Robert S Hoffman; Sophie Gosselin; Darren M Roberts; Yi Li; Thomas D Nolin; Valéry Lavergne; Marc Ghannoum Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Quincy K Tran; Mark Foster; Justin Bowler; Mia Lancaster; Jennifer Tchai; Katie Andersen; Ann Matta; Daniel J Haase Journal: Heliyon Date: 2020-01-07
Authors: Boris Böll; Enrico Schalk; Dieter Buchheidt; Justin Hasenkamp; Michael Kiehl; Til Ramon Kiderlen; Matthias Kochanek; Michael Koldehoff; Philippe Kostrewa; Annika Y Claßen; Sibylle C Mellinghoff; Bernd Metzner; Olaf Penack; Markus Ruhnke; Maria J G T Vehreschild; Florian Weissinger; Hans-Heinrich Wolf; Meinolf Karthaus; Marcus Hentrich Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.673