Literature DB >> 29992590

One-year follow-up of the prospective registry of patients using the wearable defibrillator (WEARIT-II Registry).

Valentina Kutyifa1, Arthur J Moss1, Helmut U Klein1, Scott McNitt1, Wojciech Zareba1, Ilan Goldenberg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The WEARIT-II Registry demonstrated efficacy and safety of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) for at-risk cardiac patients. However, 1-year outcomes in this population have not been reported.
METHODS: The WEARIT-II Registry enrolled 2,000 U.S. patients prescribed the WCD. One-year mortality data from start of WCD use were prospectively collected for 1,846 patients (93%). Outcome data were analyzed by disease etiology and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation following WCD use.
RESULTS: During 12 months of follow-up, 73 patients died (4%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed differences in all-cause mortality from WCD prescription between patients with ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy versus congenital/inherited heart disease (4% vs 3% vs 7%, P = 0.013). Patients with ventricular arrhythmia events during WCD use had a higher 1-year mortality (10% vs 3%, P = 0.042). Renal disease, increasing age, prior syncope, and nonbeta-blocker use predicted mortality. One-year mortality was similar in patients who did versus did not receive an ICD following WCD use in ischemic (3% vs 4%, P = 0.470) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (3% vs 3%, P = 0.892). Patients with congenital/inherited heart disease with no implanted ICD had a trend toward a higher rate of mortality than those who received an ICD (8% vs 3%, P = 0.082). Multivariate models confirmed these findings.
CONCLUSION: One-year follow-up from the WEARIT-II Registry shows an overall good survival in patients prescribed the WCD. Short-term use of WCD allows appropriate risk stratification for decision on an ICD implantation in at-risk ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Congenital/inherited heart disease patients had a higher risk of 1-year mortality even without an implanted ICD post-WCD.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implantable cardioverter defibrillator; outcomes; sudden cardiac death; ventricular tachyarrhythmias; wearable cardioverter defibrillator

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29992590     DOI: 10.1111/pace.13448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  Real life experience with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator in an international multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Boldizsar Kovacs; Tobias C Dreher; Norbert Klein; Stephanie Rosenkaimer; Susanne Röger; Jürgen Kuschyk; Ardan Muammer Saguner; Jacqueline Kowitz; Julia W Erath; Firat Duru; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Extended follow-up after wearable cardioverter-defibrillator period: the PROLONG-II study.

Authors:  Johanna Mueller-Leisse; Johanna Brunn; Christos Zormpas; Stephan Hohmann; Henrike Aenne Katrin Hillmann; Jörg Eiringhaus; Johann Bauersachs; Christian Veltmann; David Duncker
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-04

Review 3.  Update on Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mrhaf Alsamman; Adesh Prashad; Ramy Abdelmaseih; Tehreem Khalid; Rakesh Prashad
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2022-08-15

4.  Protected risk stratification with the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: results from the WEARIT-II-EUROPE registry.

Authors:  Christian Veltmann; Stefan Winter; David Duncker; Carsten G Jungbauer; Nadine K Wäßnig; J Christoph Geller; Julia W Erath; Olaf Goeing; Christian Perings; Michael Ulbrich; Mattias Roser; Daniela Husser; Laura S Gansera; Korkut Soezener; Frank Michael Malur; Michael Block; Thomas Fetsch; Valentina Kutyifa; Helmut U Klein
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.