BACKGROUND: Heart failure patients have high 30-day hospital readmission rates. Interventions designed to prevent readmissions have had mixed success. Understanding heart failure home management through the patient's experience may reframe the readmission "problem" and, ultimately, inform alternative strategies. OBJECTIVE: To understand patient and caregiver challenges to heart failure home management and perceived reasons for readmission. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Heart failure patients were recruited from two hospitals and included those who were hospitalized for heart failure at least twice within 30 days and those who had been recently discharged after their first heart failure admission. APPROACH: Open-ended, semi-structured interviews. Conclusions vetted using focus groups. KEY RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews with 31 patients revealed a combination of physical and socio-emotional influences on patients' home heart failure management. Major themes identified were home management as a struggle between adherence and adaptation, and hospital readmission as a rational choice in response to distressing symptoms. Patients identified uncertainty regarding recommendations, caused by unclear instructions and temporal incongruence between behavior and symptom onset. This uncertainty impaired their competence in making routine management decisions, resulting in a cycle of limit testing and decreasing adherence. Patients reported experiencing hopelessness and frustration in response to perceiving a deteriorating functional status. This led some to a cycle of despair characterized by worsening adherence and negative emotions. As these cycles progressed and distressing symptoms worsened, patients viewed the hospital as the safest place for recovery and not a "negative" outcome. CONCLUSION: Cycles of limit testing and despair represent important patient-centered struggles in managing heart failure. The resulting distress and fear make readmission a rational choice for patients rather than a negative outcome. Interventions (e.g., palliative care) that focus on methods to address these patient-centered factors should be further studied rather than methods to reduce hospital readmissions.
BACKGROUND:Heart failurepatients have high 30-day hospital readmission rates. Interventions designed to prevent readmissions have had mixed success. Understanding heart failure home management through the patient's experience may reframe the readmission "problem" and, ultimately, inform alternative strategies. OBJECTIVE: To understand patient and caregiver challenges to heart failure home management and perceived reasons for readmission. DESIGN: Observational qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Heart failurepatients were recruited from two hospitals and included those who were hospitalized for heart failure at least twice within 30 days and those who had been recently discharged after their first heart failure admission. APPROACH: Open-ended, semi-structured interviews. Conclusions vetted using focus groups. KEY RESULTS: Semi-structured interviews with 31 patients revealed a combination of physical and socio-emotional influences on patients' home heart failure management. Major themes identified were home management as a struggle between adherence and adaptation, and hospital readmission as a rational choice in response to distressing symptoms. Patients identified uncertainty regarding recommendations, caused by unclear instructions and temporal incongruence between behavior and symptom onset. This uncertainty impaired their competence in making routine management decisions, resulting in a cycle of limit testing and decreasing adherence. Patients reported experiencing hopelessness and frustration in response to perceiving a deteriorating functional status. This led some to a cycle of despair characterized by worsening adherence and negative emotions. As these cycles progressed and distressing symptoms worsened, patients viewed the hospital as the safest place for recovery and not a "negative" outcome. CONCLUSION: Cycles of limit testing and despair represent important patient-centered struggles in managing heart failure. The resulting distress and fear make readmission a rational choice for patients rather than a negative outcome. Interventions (e.g., palliative care) that focus on methods to address these patient-centered factors should be further studied rather than methods to reduce hospital readmissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
care management; care transitions; heart failure; patient-centered outcomes research; qualitative research
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Mark H Drazner; Gregg C Fonarow; Stephen A Geraci; Tamara Horwich; James L Januzzi; Maryl R Johnson; Edward K Kasper; Wayne C Levy; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; John J V McMurray; Judith E Mitchell; Pamela N Peterson; Barbara Riegel; Flora Sam; Lynne W Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; Emily J Tsai; Bruce L Wilkoff Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Joseph G Rogers; Chetan B Patel; Robert J Mentz; Bradi B Granger; Karen E Steinhauser; Mona Fiuzat; Patricia A Adams; Adam Speck; Kimberly S Johnson; Arun Krishnamoorthy; Hongqiu Yang; Kevin J Anstrom; Gwen C Dodson; Donald H Taylor; Jerry L Kirchner; Daniel B Mark; Christopher M O'Connor; James A Tulsky Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John J V McMurray; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Stefan D Anker; Angelo Auricchio; Michael Böhm; Kenneth Dickstein; Volkmar Falk; Gerasimos Filippatos; Cândida Fonseca; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Tiny Jaarsma; Lars Køber; Gregory Y H Lip; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Alexander Parkhomenko; Burkert M Pieske; Bogdan A Popescu; Per K Rønnevik; Frans H Rutten; Juerg Schwitter; Petar Seferovic; Janina Stepinska; Pedro T Trindade; Adriaan A Voors; Faiez Zannad; Andreas Zeiher Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-05-19 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Michelle S Diop; James L Rudolph; Kristin M Zimmerman; Mary A Richter; L Michal Skarf Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Jessica H Retrum; Jennifer Boggs; Andrew Hersh; Leslie Wright; Deborah S Main; David J Magid; Larry A Allen Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-02-05
Authors: David B Bekelman; John S Rumsfeld; Edward P Havranek; Traci E Yamashita; Evelyn Hutt; Sheldon H Gottlieb; Sydney M Dy; Jean S Kutner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-03-14 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Wei Ning Chi; Courtney Reamer; Robert Gordon; Nitasha Sarswat; Charu Gupta; Emily White VanGompel; Julie Dayiantis; Melissa Morton-Jost; Urmila Ravichandran; Karen Larimer; David Victorson; John Erwin; Lakshmi Halasyamani; Anthony Solomonides; Rema Padman; Nirav S Shah Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Karen B Hirschman; Kathryn H Bowles; Lydia Garcia-Gonzalez; Brooke Shepard; Tracie J Walser; Gladys L Thomas; Michael A Stawnychy; Barbara Riegel Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2020-12-20 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Daniel Liebzeit; Rachel Rutkowski; Alicia I Arbaje; Beth Fields; Nicole E Werner Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Caterina Checa; Laura Medina-Perucha; Miguel-Ángel Muñoz; José María Verdú-Rotellar; Anna Berenguera Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kristie M Harris; Daniel L Jacoby; Rachel Lampert; Richard J Soucier; Matthew M Burg Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2020-11-20 Impact factor: 4.214
Authors: Adam S Vohra; Rhys F M Chua; Stephanie A Besser; Charina F Alcain; Sweta Basnet; Brenda Battle; Mitchell J Coplan; James K Liao; Corey E Tabit Journal: Crit Pathw Cardiol Date: 2020-09