Jurene E Kemp1, Nicola G Bergh2,3, Muri Soares3, Allan G Ellis1. 1. Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa. 2. The Compton Herbarium, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Newlands, Cape Town, South Africa. 3. The Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, H.W. Pearson Building, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
Background and Aims: As most plants rely on pollination for persistence in communities, pollination interactions should be important determinants of plant community assembly. Here, trait and phylogenetic null modelling approaches were combined with pollinator interaction networks to elucidate the processes structuring flower colour assembly patterns in Asteraceae communities in Namaqualand, South Africa. Methods: Plant species were assigned to flower colour pattern categories (CPCs) that incorporate the complexity of the bulls-eye colour pattern, using pollinator vision models. Null models were used to assess whether daisy communities exhibit clustering (driven by filtering, facilitation or convergence) or overdispersion (driven by competitive exclusion or character displacement) of CPCs. Next, flower visitor networks were constructed for communities with non-random CPC assembly to confirm the functional role of pollinators in determining floral trait assembly. Key Results: Plant species are unevenly distributed across CPCs, the majority of which are not phylogenetically conserved, suggesting that certain CPCs have a selective advantage. Clustering of CPCs in communities is more frequent than overdispersion, and this does not reflect non-random phylogenetic assembly. In most communities at least one CPC is overrepresented relative to null assemblages. Interaction networks show that each community has a single dominant pollinator that strongly interacts with the overrepresented CPC, suggesting a role for pollinator preferences in driving clustered assembly of CPCs within daisy communities. Conclusion: This novel approach, which demonstrates non-random assembly of complex flower colour patterns and corroborates their functional association with particular pollinators, provides strong evidence that pollinators influence plant community assembly. Results suggest that in some community contexts the benefits of pollinator sharing outweigh the costs of heterospecific pollen transfer, generating clustered assembly. They also challenge the perception of generalized pollination in daisies, suggesting instead that complex daisy colour patterns represent a pollination syndrome trait linked to specific fly pollinators.
Background and Aims: As most plants rely on pollination for persistence in communities, pollination interactions should be important determinants of plant community assembly. Here, trait and phylogenetic null modelling approaches were combined with pollinator interaction networks to elucidate the processes structuring flower colour assembly patterns in Asteraceae communities in Namaqualand, South Africa. Methods: Plant species were assigned to flower colour pattern categories (CPCs) that incorporate the complexity of the bulls-eye colour pattern, using pollinator vision models. Null models were used to assess whether daisy communities exhibit clustering (driven by filtering, facilitation or convergence) or overdispersion (driven by competitive exclusion or character displacement) of CPCs. Next, flower visitor networks were constructed for communities with non-random CPC assembly to confirm the functional role of pollinators in determining floral trait assembly. Key Results: Plant species are unevenly distributed across CPCs, the majority of which are not phylogenetically conserved, suggesting that certain CPCs have a selective advantage. Clustering of CPCs in communities is more frequent than overdispersion, and this does not reflect non-random phylogenetic assembly. In most communities at least one CPC is overrepresented relative to null assemblages. Interaction networks show that each community has a single dominant pollinator that strongly interacts with the overrepresented CPC, suggesting a role for pollinator preferences in driving clustered assembly of CPCs within daisy communities. Conclusion: This novel approach, which demonstrates non-random assembly of complex flower colour patterns and corroborates their functional association with particular pollinators, provides strong evidence that pollinators influence plant community assembly. Results suggest that in some community contexts the benefits of pollinator sharing outweigh the costs of heterospecific pollen transfer, generating clustered assembly. They also challenge the perception of generalized pollination in daisies, suggesting instead that complex daisy colour patterns represent a pollination syndrome trait linked to specific fly pollinators.
Authors: Steven W Kembel; Peter D Cowan; Matthew R Helmus; William K Cornwell; Helene Morlon; David D Ackerly; Simon P Blomberg; Campbell O Webb Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Kathryn A LeCroy; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Matthew H Koski; Nathan I Morehouse; Tia-Lynn Ashman Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 5.753