Alicja Domagała1, Małgorzata M Bała2,3, Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez4, Dawid Storman5, Mateusz J Świerz5, Mateusz Kaczmarczyk3, Monika Storman3. 1. Institute of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 2. Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 3. Systematic Reviews Unit - Polish Cochrane Branch, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 4. Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada. 5. Systematic Reviews Unit - Polish Cochrane Branch, Students' Scientific Group of Systematic Reviews, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the wide range of studies concerning physician satisfaction in different European countries, there is a lack of literature reviews synthesizing and analyzing current evidence evaluating satisfaction of physicians working in European hospitals. The goal of our research was to provide a general overview of the studies in this area and their results. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to January 2017 including both MESH/Emtree terms and free text words related to the subject with no language restrictions. The eligibility criteria included: (i) target population: physicians working in European hospitals, (ii) quantitative research aimed at assessing physician satisfaction and (iii) validated tools. We performed a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8585 abstracts and 368 full text articles were independently screened by 2 reviewers against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Finally 61 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis. Included studies enrolled a total of 50 001 physicians from 17 countries. Sample sizes varied between 54 and 7090 participants (median: 336). According to our review ∼59% of physicians working in European hospitals are overall satisfied, 3.54 was the mean satisfaction among studies reporting data on a scale from 1 to 5, 4.81 for studies with a scale from 1 to 7, 6.12 among studies reporting data on a scale from 1 to 10, and 59.65 among studies with a scale from 0 to 100. CONCLUSIONS: The level of physician satisfaction in Europe is moderate. There is a large variety of tools and scales used to assess it.
BACKGROUND: Despite the wide range of studies concerning physician satisfaction in different European countries, there is a lack of literature reviews synthesizing and analyzing current evidence evaluating satisfaction of physicians working in European hospitals. The goal of our research was to provide a general overview of the studies in this area and their results. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to January 2017 including both MESH/Emtree terms and free text words related to the subject with no language restrictions. The eligibility criteria included: (i) target population: physicians working in European hospitals, (ii) quantitative research aimed at assessing physician satisfaction and (iii) validated tools. We performed a narrative synthesis and meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 8585 abstracts and 368 full text articles were independently screened by 2 reviewers against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Finally 61 studies were eligible for qualitative analysis. Included studies enrolled a total of 50 001 physicians from 17 countries. Sample sizes varied between 54 and 7090 participants (median: 336). According to our review ∼59% of physicians working in European hospitals are overall satisfied, 3.54 was the mean satisfaction among studies reporting data on a scale from 1 to 5, 4.81 for studies with a scale from 1 to 7, 6.12 among studies reporting data on a scale from 1 to 10, and 59.65 among studies with a scale from 0 to 100. CONCLUSIONS: The level of physician satisfaction in Europe is moderate. There is a large variety of tools and scales used to assess it.
Authors: Alicja Domagała; Małgorzata M Bała; Dawid Storman; Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez; Mateusz J Świerz; Mateusz Kaczmarczyk; Monika Storman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez; Alicja Domagała; Katarzyna Dubas-Jakóbczyk; Maciej Polak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Katarzyna Dubas-Jakóbczyk; Alicja Domagała; Dorota Kiedik; Juan Nicolás Peña-Sánchez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 3.390