Literature DB >> 29991989

Studying the expression rate and methylation of Reprimo gene in the blood of patients suffering from gastric cancer.

Amin Abbasi1, Sahar Heydari2.   

Abstract

As gastric cancer has no exclusive signals in its initial phases, it is usually diagnosed in advanced phases. Although many researches have been conducted on methylation and diagnosis of cancer's markers, the methylation and expression of Reprimo gene and its correlation with gastric cancer has not been thoroughly studied. Methylation of Reprimo promoter is a repetitive procedure exclusive to cancer which nullifies its expression and performance. The present research seeks to study the expression and methylation of Reprimo among people suffering with gastric cancer so that it may be used as a biomarker for early diagnosis. Fifty blood samples taken from healthy people (normal samples) and 50 blood samples obtained from gastric cancer patients were analyzed using Real-Time PCR. The methylation status of the promoter of Reprimo was studied using Methylation Specific PCR technique in normal samples and in gastric cancer Iranian patients. We observed reduction in expression rate of Reprimo in the blood samples of patients suffering with gastric cancer in comparison to normal blood samples. A significant correlation was also observed between the expression rate of this gene, age and methylation of its promoter among patients suffering with gastric cancer and various analysis points to a correlation between reduced expressions of Reprimo gene in gastric cancer patients. In conclusion, reduced expression of Reprimo gene and greater levels of methylation of its promoter seems to be promising biomarkers for early diagnosis of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; MS-PCR; Reprimo; methylation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29991989      PMCID: PMC6036304          DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2018.7423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol        ISSN: 2037-7452


Ethical Publication Statement

We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.

Gastric cancer is the 5th most common type of cancer in the world with a mortality rate of 723000 cases reported in 2012 throughout the world rendering it as the third main cause of mortality as a result of cancer.[1] Reprimo (RPRM) gene acts as a potential suppressor of P53-dependent tumor signaling pathway. It encodes a highly glycosilated protein mostly found in cytoplasm.[2,3] Reprimo is one of the genes responsible for regulation of development and growth of normal cells.[4] Deactivation of Reprimo gene usually takes place in initial phases of various tumors mostly as a result of DNA methylation.[5] It has been greatly observed that in two cell categories of gastric cancer without Reprimo methylation, weak expression in normal conditions and high expression in cases of DNA damage were observed.[6] Expression of Reprimo is usually stimulated in response to damages caused to DNA, but expression of Reprimo wipes out the expression and effects of this gene.[6,7] As a result, this gene acts as a suppressive agent for tumor growth in gastric cancer. Clinical assessment of methylation of Reprimo promoter may be used as an indicator of invasive tumors, and thus as an indicator for chemotherapy.[8] Although it is of significant importance for better management of gastric cancer, the methylation and expression of Reprimo gene and its correlation with gastric cancer has not been thoroughly analyzed. Thus, the present research seeks to study the correlation between methylation and expression rate of Reprimo gene in gastric cancer.

Materials and Methods

The present research studied as many as 100 venous blood samples including 50 healthy blood samples (normal samples) and 50 blood samples obtained from gastric cancer patients. Proper samples were obtained from Masoud Medical Diagnostic Laboratory (Iran) collected from 2013 to 2015 in test tubes containing EDTA. The individuals studied aged 16 to 86 years old. Twentysix samples were from female and the remaining sevetyfour from male subjects. 40 samples were older than 55 years, while the remaining 60 were younger than 55. All participating patients in this study were in the early stages of gastric cancer. They had been referred to the doctor with stomach ache, diarrhea and vomiting.

Extracting RNA from blood and cDNA synthesis

RNA extraction kit of Kiagen Com. (cat. No. 762165) was used to extract RNA in accordance with the standard protocol which accompanied the kit. cDNA synthesis was carried out in a microtube 1μl of dNTP (10Mm), 1μl of Random Hexamer (400Mm), 1 μl of Oligo dt, 2 μl of MMULV 10X buffer, 0.5 μl of MMULV (200U/μl) all provided by Sinagen Co. (Iran) and the 10μl of RNA sample and 4.5μl of Nuclease Free Water in a total volume of 20μl was conducted. The microtubes were exposed to a temperature of 65 ℃ for 5 minutes and then to a temperature of 4 ℃ for 1 minute. Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used for internal control.

Carrying out Real-Time PCR

Using the sequences in NCBI gene bank, the primers required for Reprimo genes and GAPDH were designed and studied using Gene Runner software. The designed primer had a 100% match with sequences and it was used in Iran for the first time (Table 1). The mixture of Real- Time PCR contained 10μl of master mix obtained from Sinagen Co. (Iran), 0.5μl forward primer (0.4mM), 0.5μl of reverse primer (0.4 mM), 1μl of cDNA sample, and 8μl of distilled water with a total volume of 20μl. The following thermal plan was designed for PCR reaction using Reprimo primer: 10 minutes of initial denaturation in a temperature of 95℃ for 1 cycle, 40 cycles of exposure to a temperature of 95 ℃ each lasting 15 seconds, and 1 minute of exposure to 64.6 ℃ of annealing. The following thermal plan was defined for PCR reaction using GAPDH primers as internal controls: 10 minutes of initial denaturation in a temperature of 95℃ for 1 cycle, 45 cycles of exposure to a temperature of 95℃ for 15 seconds, 30 seconds of exposure to an annealing temperature of 59℃. In the end, the analysis of data obtained through Real-Time PCR was carried out based upon the threshold cycle obtained for target and reference genes. The difference between the average of reference Ct gene and target Ct gene was calculated as an indicator of ΔCt for both test and control groups. To study the specificity of primers and cyber green fluorescence color and assuring the proliferation of exclusive parts and making sure there are no non-specific particles and Dimer-Primer in PCR product, the melting curve was drawn for Reprimo and GAPDH genes separately using Step One Real-Time PCR Applied Biosystems (Figures 1 and 2). The linear charts of Reprimo and GAPDH genes proliferation curve were drawn by assessing the changes in the fluorescence level using Step One Real-Time PCR Applied Biosystems (Figures 3 and 4).
Table 1.

Primers designed for Real-Time PCR reaction of Reprimo and GAPDH genes

PrimerSequenceTm ℃Amplicon Size (bp)
Reprimo (F)CTGGGACAAAGACCCAGAAT58.9983 bp
Reprimo (R)GGTGTCACGGATGTCAAGAG59.1083 bp
GAPDH (F)ATGGAGAAGGCTGGGGCT62.05124 bp
GAPDH (R)ATCTTGAGGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTC61.62124 bp
Fig 1.

The melting curve of Reprimo in normal samples and gastric patients

Fig 3.

Linear curve of Reprimo gene proliferation in normal samples and gastric patients

DNA Modification

Purification of genome DNA from blood was carried out using DNA purification gene obtained from Kiagen Co. (Cat. No./ID: 69504) based upon the standard protocol specified in the kit. EpiJET Bisulfite Conversion Kit produced by Thermo Scientific Co. (USA) was used for DNA methylation in accordance with the protocol specified in the kit.

MS-PCR to diagnose the methylated and non-methylated areas

In designing the primers for carrying out MS-PCR (Methylation Specific PCR), those primers designed for the regions containing methylated cytosines begin with letter G, while those designed for areas containing non-methylated cytosines begin with letter T. Two pairs of primers were designed for this purpose: 1 pair of methylated primer and 1 pair of non-methylated primer (Table 2). The complex used in the reaction contained 12.5μl of master mix produced by Cleaver Scientific in England (Cat. No. CSL-JANDA), 1μl of forward primer, 1μl of reverse primer, 2μl of DNA sample, and 8.5μl of distilled water in a total volume of 25μl. The following thermal plan was defined for MS-PCR in order to diagnose the methylated and non-methylated regions: 3 minutes of initial denaturation in a temperature of 93℃, 30 cycles of exposure to a temperature of 93℃ for 30 seconds, and exposure to an annealing temperature of 54.4℃ for primers designed for non-methylated regions and 64.6℃ for primers designed for methylated regions for 30 seconds, 30 seconds of exposure to a temperature of 72℃ for elongation, and a 1 final cycle of exposure to a temperature of 72℃ for 5 minutes. Finally, 1.5% agarose gel was used to study the results of MS-PCR reaction.
Table 2.

Primers designed for methylated and non-methylated regions in MS-PCR reaction

PrimerSequenceTm ℃Amplicon Size (bp)
ReprimoMet (F)AGTATTATTAGGGTTGGAGCGGACG61.2158 bp
Reprimo Met (R)AAATACCGAACTAAACGCTCACTCG60.7158 bp
Reprimo Unmet (F)TATTATTAGGGTTGGAGTGGATG54.3158 bp
Reprimo Unmet(R)AAATACTGAACTAAATGCTCACTTG55.2158 bp

Results and Discussion

The results of the expression rate of Reprimo gene

Ct of samples was calculated by the machine following the proliferation reaction and it was converted to RQ (Quantification Relative) of expression rate. Graph of the results was drawn by Graph Pad Prism software (Fig. 5). The majority of gastric patients exhibited a reduced Reprimo gene expression rate compared to normal cases. In this case, the average of normal samples was set to 1 by machine analysis. As it was expected from Reprimo Gene as a suppressive tumor in gastric cancer, the expression rate of this gene in normal samples was much more than what was observed in the majority of samples suffering with gastric cancer. This correlation is significant as P-value < 0.05. The average of expression of gastric patients is much less than what was observed in normal samples. This comparison is a significant correlation considering the p-value (Fig. 10). An analysis of results revealed that the expression rate of Reprimo gene among sick cases compared to healthy people (normal samples) younger than 55 is 1.206 while this value among those older than 55 was 0.673. This classification is solely based upon people’s age group. As it is evident in chart 3, the mean expression rate of patients younger than 55 is statistically significant (Fig. 7). The expression rate of Reprimo gene among male patients was nearly equal to what was observed among female patients and the mean RQ level of men and women was 0.785 and 0.774 respectively (Fig 8). Considering chart 4, we may conclude that gender has no influence on the expression rate of Reprimo and pathogenicity of gastric cancer.
Fig 5.

Analysis of Reprimo gene expression in gastric patients compared to normal samples (p-value ≤ 0.0001). 1-35 groups: Average rate of Reprimo gene expression in Gastric cancer Patients. Normal group: Average rate of Reprimo gene expression in normal samples.

Fig 7.

Analysis of expression rate of Reprimo gene among cases older than 55 and those younger than 55 (p ≤0.0106)

The results of MS-PCR using methylated primers

Having carried out MS-PCR using methylated primers on 100 intended samples in order to study the methylation status of Reprimo gene promoter, it turned out that 23 samples out of the total 50 DNA samples of patients were methylated, but this number in normal cases was only 7. As a result, 45.7% of samples for Reprimo gene promoter are methylated (Fig. 9). The expression rate of Reprimo gene in non-methylated samples turned out to be 99.6% while this value in methylated samples was 54%. The mean expression rate of Reprimo gene in non-methylated samples is more than what was observed in methylated samples.
Fig 9.

Example of MS-PCR results obtained using methylated primers. The samples with a band size of 158 bp have methylation in the region of Reprimo gene promoter

Although recognition of factors such as helicobacter pylori and various environmental factors has helped reduce the prevalence of gastric cancer, it is still one of the most common types of cancers in the world and constitutes a major clinical challenge.[9] Gastric cancer is one of the most important causes of mortality in developing countries.[10] As a result of ineffectiveness of most common treatments, the majority of patients have a low survival rate even after treatment and pass away. Various studies have pointed to the fact that various factors such as helicobacter pylori infection and its resulting side effects and other factors such as genetics and its resulting polymorphism may have a major influence on sensitivity and development of gastric cancer.[11] The multi-factor nature of gastric cancer makes it impossible to come up with an accurate prohibition strategy and to diagnose it quickly. As the majority of gastric cancer cases have no symptoms until they reach the advanced level, early diagnosis of gastric cancer is very difficult.[12] The first documented epigenetic change in gastric cancer is hyper-methylation of the promoter of genes that restore inconsistent nucleotide mutations of DNA.[13] Several genes have been described as tumor repressors deactivated as a result of hyper-methylation in gastric cancer. Although recent reports point to the discovery of methylation of particular genes, no comprehensive characteristic of DNA methylation in gastric cancer has been reported to this date. Bernal et al started a research to find a gene with inappropriate hyper-methylation which is useful for early diagnosis.[15] By searching CpG islands in the promoter 24 region of candidated gene among 32 cases suffering with gastric cancer, they arrived at the conclusion that inappropriate methylation of Reprimo can act as a potential biomarker for early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Reprimo is the new candidate mediating termination of cell cycle in G2 phase with the aid of P53. Takao Takahashi et al. have pointed to the fact that Reprimo gene is not expressed by its promoter’s methylation in pancreatic and lung cancer. They proved that hyper-methylation is responsible for transcription of Reprimo through hyper-methylation (92% match). Methylation of Reprimo promoter has been reported in 79% of gastric cancer, 62% of gallbladder cancer, 57% of lymphoma, 56% of clone cancers, 40% of esophageal cancer, 37% of breast cancer, and 31% of leukemia cases.[16] By studying 39 patients with an average age of older than 64 and a men to woman ration of 1.3 to 1 and comparing them against normal control samples, Alejandro et al arrived at the conclusion that Reprimo is superior in diagnosing non-invasive genes than CEA and CA 19_9. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the rate of positive possibilities may be a great progress in assessing the diagnostic effect of Reprimo for noninvasive diagnosis of gastric cancer.[17] Considering the important effect of Reprimo gene in preventing gastric cancer and as a repressor in early diagnosis of gastric cancer among those suffering with it, we decided to study the expression rate of this gene in the blood sample of those suffering with gastric cancer in Iran. This project is the first comprehensive research studying the expression rate of gene in the blood samples obtained from those suffering with gastric cancer in Iran. Using Real Time PCR based upon cyber-green of RPRM gene expression and utilizing MS-PCR technique, the methylation status of Reprimo gene promoter was studied. As the results of this research showed, the expression rate of RPRM gene in the blood samples obtained from patients is much less than what is observed in normal blood samples. Considering that all patients with gastric cancer who participated in this study were in the early stages of cancer, based on our results, the study of Reprimo gene hypermethylation can be useful in early diagnosis of gastric cancer. Our results are in line with those reported by Kathleen Saavedra et al. pointing that Reprimo gene is a tumor repressor and its methylation in the blood samples obtained from those suffering with gastric cancer is much higer than what we see in healthy individuals (45.7% of patients constituting a significant correlation). It can also act as a biomarker for early diagnosis of gastric cancer. There is also a significant correlation between expression rate of Reprimo and the age of people suffering with cancer and the methylation status of its promoter. On the hoter hand, the correlation between the expression rate of Reprimo gene and the gender of those suffering with cancer was far from being significant.
  14 in total

1.  Reprimo, a new candidate mediator of the p53-mediated cell cycle arrest at the G2 phase.

Authors:  R Ohki; J Nemoto; H Murasawa; E Oda; J Inazawa; N Tanaka; T Taniguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-07-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Aberrant patterns of DNA methylation, chromatin formation and gene expression in cancer.

Authors:  S B Baylin; M Esteller; M R Rountree; K E Bachman; K Schuebel; J G Herman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 3.  The p53 circuit board.

Authors:  Kelly D Sullivan; Corrie L Gallant-Behm; Ryan E Henry; Jean-Luc Fraikin; Joaquín M Espinosa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-02-07

Review 4.  Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Jon R Kelley; John M Duggan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Hyperglycemia increases risk of gastric cancer posed by Helicobacter pylori infection: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Fumie Ikeda; Yasufumi Doi; Koji Yonemoto; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Michiaki Kubo; Kentaro Shikata; Jun Hata; Yumihiro Tanizaki; Takayuki Matsumoto; Mitsuo Iida; Yutaka Kiyohara
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sachiyo Nomura; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 7.  Molecular biomarkers in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hironori Shiozaki; Kazuki Sudo; Jeannelyn S Estrella; Brian D Badgwell; Prajnan Das; Aurelio Matamoros; Shumei Song; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  DNA damage-inducible gene, reprimo functions as a tumor suppressor and is suppressed by promoter methylation in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Akira Ooki; Keishi Yamashita; Kensei Yamaguchi; Anupom Mondal; Hiroshi Nishimiya; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 9.  Noncoding Genomics in Gastric Cancer and the Gastric Precancerous Cascade: Pathogenesis and Biomarkers.

Authors:  Alejandra Sandoval-Bórquez; Kathleen Saavedra; Gonzalo Carrasco-Avino; Benjamin Garcia-Bloj; Jacqueline Fry; Ignacio Wichmann; Alejandro H Corvalán
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.434

10.  Loss of Expression of Reprimo, a p53-induced Cell Cycle Arrest Gene, Correlates with Invasive Stage of Tumor Progression and p73 Expression in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen Saavedra; José Valbuena; Wilda Olivares; María José Marchant; Andrés Rodríguez; Verónica Torres-Estay; Gonzalo Carrasco-Avino; Leda Guzmán; Francisco Aguayo; Juan Carlos Roa; Alejandro H Corvalán
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  EJTM3 is also covering Mobility and Medicine at large, an update.

Authors:  Ugo Carraro
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2018-09-17

2.  Implementing EjtM3 (European Journal of Translational Myology, Mobility, Medicine) along the silk-road.

Authors:  Paola Arslan; Barbara Ravara
Journal:  Eur J Transl Myol       Date:  2018-06-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.