| Literature DB >> 29991957 |
Huizi Li1,2, Yinghua Liu3, Xinsheng Zhang3, Qing Xu3, Yong Zhang3, Changyong Xue3, Changjiang Guo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bile acids play a pivotal role in cholesterol metabolism via the enterohepatic circulation. This study investigated the effects of medium-chain triglycerides (MCTs)/medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) on the reduction of bile acid absorption in the small intestine and the mechanisms of action in vivo and partially verified in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Bile acids; Caco-2 cells; Ileal bile acid binding protein; Medium-chain fatty acids; Medium-chain triglyceride
Year: 2018 PMID: 29991957 PMCID: PMC5987598 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-018-0267-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Composition and nutrition factors of experimental diets for C57BL/6 J mice
| Ingredients | CR-MCT | CR-LCT | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basal diet (%) | 86.7 | 86.7 | 88.7 |
| Lard (%) | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Cholesterol (%) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Bile salt (%) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| MCT (%) | 2 | – | – |
| LCT (%) | – | 2 | – |
| Energy (KJ/g) | 16.81 | 16.81 | 16.39 |
| Percentage of Nutrients | |||
| Protein (%) | 18.69 | 18.69 | 19.07 |
| Fat (%) | 15.36 | 15.36 | 13.63 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 47.22 | 47.22 | 48.18 |
| Cholesterol (%) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mineral mixture (%) | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.08 |
| Vitamin mixture (%) | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.52 |
| Fibre (%) | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.5 |
| Water (%) | 9.11 | 9.11 | 9.3 |
| Others (%) | 5.58 | 5.58 | 5.72 |
Fatty acid composition of CR-MCT, CR-LCT and CR diets
| Fatty acids | CR-MCT | CR-LCT | CR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| g/100 g diet | % | g/100 g diet | % | g/100 g diet | % | |
| C8:0 | 1.51 | 9.75 | NDa | NDa | NDa | NDa |
| C10:0 | 0.55 | 3.55 | NDa | NDa | NDa | NDa |
| C14:0 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| C16:0 | 3.09 | 19.95 | 3.51 | 22.52 | 3.13 | 22.90 |
| C16:1 | 0.19 | 1.23 | 0.19 | 1.22 | 0.19 | 1.39 |
| C17:0 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.44 |
| C17:1 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.15 |
| C18:0 | 1.47 | 9.49 | 1.66 | 10.68 | 1.54 | 11.27 |
| C18:1 | 5.26 | 33.96 | 6.21 | 39.88 | 5.36 | 39.21 |
| C18:2 | 3.09 | 19.95 | 3.61 | 23.16 | 3.12 | 22.82 |
| C18:3 | 0.18 | 1.16 | 0.22 | 1.39 | 0.18 | 1.32 |
| C20:0 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 0.22 |
| C20:4 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| C20:5 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| C22:0 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Total | 15.49 | 100 | 15.58 | 100 | 13.67 | 100 |
anot detectable
Primer sequences used for mRNA quantification with qRT-PCR
| Target Genes | Human / Mouse | Forward (5′-3′) | Reverse (5′-3′) | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASBTa | M | AGGCTTTATCCTGTCTGTGGC | CAGTGTGGAGCAAGTGGTCAT | NM_011388.2 |
| I-BABPb | H | GAGAGCTGTGTTGTCTGCGT | TTGAAGTTGCGGGCCTTTTC | NM_001040442.1 |
| M | GATCATCACAGAGGTCCAGC | CTCCATCTTCACGGTAGCCT | NM_008375.2 | |
| OST-αc | M | TCCCTGACGGCATCTATGAC | ACAAGCACCTGGAACAGAGC | NM_145932.3 |
| OST-βd | M | GGAACTGCTGGAAGAAATGC | TTCTGTTTGCCAGGATGCTC | NM_178933.2 |
agene name: a solute carrier family 10, member 2 (Slc10a2), protein name: apical sodium-dependent bile salt transporter (ASBT)
bgene name: fatty acid binding protein 6 (FABP6/fabp6), protein name: ileal bile acid binding protein (I-BABP)
cgene name: solute carrier family 51, alpha subunit (Slc51a), protein name: organic solute transporter (Ost-α)
dgene name: solute carrier family 51, beta subunit (Slc51b), protein name: organic solute transporter (Ost-β)
Fig. 1Cell viability of Caco-2 cells in different conditions. Cell viability percentage = OD in experiment group /OD in control group× 100%
Fig. 2Body weights in C57BL/6J mice during 16 weeks (n = 12). aP < 0.05, versus CR-LCT group; bP < 0.05, versus CR group
Blood lipid profiles in C57BL/6 J mice (n = 12)
| Blood lipid profiles | CR-MCT | CR-LCT | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.52 ± 0.65a,b | 4.13 ± 0.49 | 4.01 ± 0.33 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.70 ± 0.29 | 0.88 ± 0.24 | 0.86 ± 0.15 |
| HDL- C (mmol/L) | 3.12 ± 0.57 | 3.34 ± 0.39 | 3.21 ± 0.25 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.43 ± 0.11a,b | 0.66 ± 0.18 | 0.61 ± 0.24 |
| HDL-C/LDL-C | 7.54 ± 1.74a | 5.44 ± 1.61 | 6.17 ± 2.65 |
| TBA (mmol/L) | 16.23 ± 6.51 | 17.71 ± 5.84 | 18.23 ± 11.91 |
aP < 0.05, versus CR-LCT group
bP < 0.05, versus CR group
Bile acid profiles in faeces in C57BL/6 J mice after 16 weeks (n = 5)
| BAs in Faeces (mg/3 d) | CR-MCT | CR-LCT | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 115.11 ± 14.05a,b | 69.48 ± 11.14 | 78.03 ± 12.82 |
| CDCA | 10.62 ± 1.44a,b | 4.57 ± 1.01 | 4.52 ± 0.96 |
| TCA | 2.43 ± 0.45 | 2.7 ± 0.31 | 2.84 ± 0.43 |
| TCDCA | 3.77 ± 0.27a | 3.05 ± 0.06 | 3.24 ± 0.98 |
| GCA | 1.05 ± 0.27 | 1.16 ± 0.33 | 1.33 ± 0.32 |
| GCDCA | 7.00 ± 2.92 | 4.94 ± 2.76 | 5.38 ± 2.25 |
| Total Primary BAs | 139.98 ± 11.44a,b | 85.89 ± 10.7 | 95.33 ± 13.89 |
| DCA | 2.1 ± 0.22 | 1.98 ± 0.13 | 1.62 ± 0.42 |
| LCA | 8.71 ± 0.9a.b | 4.15 ± 0.69 | 4.55 ± 0.19 |
| UDCA | 6.89 ± 0.99a.b | 5.37 ± 0.73 | 4.9 ± 0.89 |
| TLCA | 0.76 ± 0.02a.b | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.49 ± 0.05 |
| TDCA | 3.82 ± 0.28 | 3.70 ± 0.14 | 3.26 ± 0.48 |
| GDCA | 1.38 ± 0.45 | 1.18 ± 0.01 | 1.48 ± 0.35 |
| Total Secondary BAs | 23.66 ± 1.53a,b | 16.87 ± 1.37 | 16.3 ± 1.67 |
| Total BAs | 163.64 ± 11.6a,b | 102.77 ± 11.14 | 111.62 ± 13.96 |
aP < 0.05, versus CR-LCT group
bP < 0.05, versus CR group
Bile acid profiles in bile in C57BL/6 J mice after 16 weeks (n = 5)
| BAs in bile (mmol/L) | CR-MCT | CR-LCT | CR |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA | 92.00 ± 16.05a,b | 71.42 ± 8.00 | 62.29 ± 6.70 |
| CDCA | 3.65 ± 0.48a,b | 2.38 ± 0.27 | 2.50 ± 0.66 |
| TCA | 1.53 ± 0.22 | 1.43 ± 1.00 | 1.73 ± 0.62 |
| TCDCA | 2.97 ± 0.77a,b | 2.04 ± 0.38 | 1.85 ± 0.25 |
| GCA | 1.75 ± 1.05 | 1.70 ± 0.57 | 1.52 ± 0.10 |
| GCDCA | 0.56 ± 0.07a,b | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
| Total Primary BAs | 102.47 ± 17.51a,b | 79.19 ± 6.75 | 70.13 ± 7.51 |
| DCA | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 0.71 ± 0.04 | 0.66 ± 0.13 |
| LCA | 2.03 ± 0.11 | 1.90 ± 0.28 | 1.97 ± 0.10 |
| UDCA | 0.30 ± 0.05 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 0.27 ± 0.05 |
| TLCA | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 |
| TDCA | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.10 ± 0.03 |
| GDCA | 0.89 ± 0.13 | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 0.97 ± 0.18 |
| Total Secondary BAs | 4.14 ± 0.20 | 4.09 ± 0.44 | 4.11 ± 0.24 |
| Total BAs | 106.61 ± 17.68a,b | 83.28 ± 6.67 | 74.25 ± 7.39 |
aP < 0.05, versus CR-LCT group
bP < 0.05, versus CR group
Fig. 3The mRNA and protein expression of bile acid absorption transporters in C57BL/6J mice (n = 5). Total RNA and total protein were extracted from small intestine tissues. mRNA transcription levels were measured using real-time PCR analysis, and protein expression levels were measured using Western blot analysis. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used to normalize expression levels. Critical threshold (Ct) values were compared in a, while relative light density values were compared in c. aP < 0.05 versus CR-LCT group; bP < 0.05 versus CR group; a. critical threshold; b. section of blots; c. grey-scale analysis
Fig. 4Immunofluorescence of I-BABP in the small intestine in C57BL/6J mice. The bar represents 50 μm in the image. I-BABP was observed as green fluorescence, and the nucleus was observed as red fluorescence
The Papp values of CA across Caco-2 monolayers treated with various fatty acids and the TEER values (n = 5)
| Group | C8:0 | C10:0 | C18:0 | C18:1 | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | ||||||
| Vehicle | + | + | + | + | + | |
| CA | + | + | + | + | + | |
| C8:0 | + | – | – | – | – | |
| C10:0 | – | + | – | – | – | |
| C18:0 | – | – | + | – | – | |
| C18:1 | – | – | – | + | – | |
| Fatty acid concentration | ||||||
| 0 μmol/L |
| – | – | – | – | 1.16 ± 0.14 |
| TEERf | 622.80 ± 56.03 | |||||
| 50 μmol/L |
| 0.87 ± 0.06a,c,d | 0.93 ± 0.13a,c | 1.26 ± 0.19 | 1.06 ± 0.02 | – |
| TEERf | 669.80 ± 44.56 | 713.60 ± 87.06 | 653.40 ± 59.08 | 696.60 ± 116.57 | ||
| 100 μmol/L |
| 0.74 ± 0.03a,c,d | 0.81 ± 0.06a,c,d | 1.06 ± 0.21 | 1.1 ± 0.09 | – |
| TEERf | 710.60 ± 115.01 | 673.80 ± 60.20 | 628.40 ± 58.92 | 668.00 ± 124.00 | ||
| 200 μmol/L |
| 0.43 ± 0.07a,b,c,d | 0.64 ± 0.04a,c,d | 1.11 ± 0.16 | 1.02 ± 0.09 | – |
| TEERf | 707.00 ± 134.62 | 591.20 ± 47.56 | 651.00 ± 57.72 | 586.20 ± 53.60 | ||
aP < 0.05, versus control group
bP < 0.05, versus C10:0
cP < 0.05, versus C18:0 group
dP < 0.05, versus C18:1 group
ePapp of CA (AP → BL, cm/s × 10–6)
fTEER values of Caco-2 monolayers (Ω·cm2)
Fig. 5The mRNA and protein expression of I-BABP in Caco-2 cells (n = 5). Total RNA and total protein were extracted from Caco-2 cells, the mRNA transcription level was measured using real-time PCR analysis, and the protein expression level was measured using Western blot analysis. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used to normalize the expression levels, and Critical threshold (Ct) values were compared in a, while relative light density values were compared in c. aP < 0.05 versus CA group; bP < 0.05 versus C18:0 + CA; cP < 0.05 versus C18:1 + CA group; a. critical threshold; b. section of blots; c. grey-scale analysis
Fig. 6Graphical abstract of the effects of MCTs/MCFAs on reducing intestinal bile acid reabsorption. Arrows (↑) represent an increasing level and upregulation of activity or protein or mRNA expression. Arrows (↓) represent downregulation