| Literature DB >> 29991673 |
Seung-Won Lee1,2, Guangming Wu3, Na Young Choi1,2, Hye Jeong Lee1,2, Jin Seok Bang1,2, Yukyeong Lee1,2, Minseong Lee1,2, Kisung Ko4, Hans R Schöler3,5, Kinarm Ko1,2,6.
Abstract
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) derived from mouse testis are unipotent in regard of spermatogenesis. Our previous study demonstrated that SSCs can be fully reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells, so called germline-derived pluripotent stem cells (gPS cells), on feeder cells (mouse embryonic fibroblasts), which supports SSC proliferation and induction of pluripotency. Because of an uncontrollable microenvironment caused by interactions with feeder cells, feeder-based SSC reprogramming is not suitable for elucidation of the self-reprogramming mechanism by which SSCs are converted into pluripotent stem cells. Recently, we have established a Matrigel-based SSC expansion culture system that allows long-term SSC proliferation without mouse embryonic fibroblast support. In this study, we developed a new feeder-free SSC self-reprogramming protocol based on the Matrigel-based culture system. The gPS cells generated using a feeder-free reprogramming system showed pluripotency at the molecular and cellular levels. The differentiation potential of gPS cells was confirmed in vitro and in vivo. Our study shows for the first time that the induction of SSC pluripotency can be achieved without feeder cells. The newly developed feeder-free self-reprogramming system could be a useful tool to reveal the mechanism by which unipotent cells are self-reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells.Entities:
Keywords: germline-derived pluripotent stem cells; self-reprogramming; spermatogonial stem cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29991673 PMCID: PMC6078851 DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2018.2294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cells ISSN: 1016-8478 Impact factor: 5.034
Fig. 1Establishment of FF-gPS Cells
(A, B) Conversion of SSCs into gPS cells under feeder-free conditions. (C, D) Established FF-gPS cells from Oct4-GFP–expressing colonies. (E) Immunofluorescence staining of SSEA1. (F) FF-gPS cells stained positive for alkaline phosphatase. Scale bars: 200 μm (A, B), 100 μm (C–F).
Fig. 2Cellular and Molecular Characterization of FF-gPSs
(A) RT-PCR analysis of the expression of pluripotency marker genes. The gene expression pattern of FF-gPS cells was comparable to those of mESCs and gPS cells. (B) Hierarchical analysis of mESCs, SSCs, MEFs, gPS cells, and FF-gPS cells. (C) Comparison of global gene expression between mESCs and SSCs (left), and between mESCs and FF-gPS cells (right). Passages: ESCs P43, SSCs P115, gPS P21, FF-gPS1 P5 and FF-gPS2 P10.
Fig. 3Methylation Status of the Differentially Methylated Region of H19 and the Imprinting Control Region of Snrpn in mESC, gPS, SSC, and FF-gPS cells
DNA methylation was analyzed by bisulfate genomic sequencing. Open and filled circles indicate unmethylated and methylated CpGs, respectively. DMR, differentially methylated region. Passages: ESCs P43, SSCs P115, gPS P21 and FF-gPS P10.
Fig. 4In vitro and in vivo Differentiation and the Chimera Formation Ability of gPS Cells
(A–C)In vitro differentiation.(A) Tuj1 (green), DAPI (B) SMA (green), DAPI. (C) AFP (green), DAPI. (D–F) In vivo differentiation. (D) Ectoderm (neural rosette). (E) Mesoderm (muscle). (F) Endoderm (gland). (G, H) beta-Gal staining of chimeric mouse. (I) Oct4-GFP–positive cells in a gonad. Scale bars: 25 μm (A–C), 100 μm (D–F).