STUDY OBJECTIVES: For clinicians involved in investigating and treating sleep disorders, understanding the accuracy of patient recall of supine sleep would allow informed comparisons between polysomnography (PSG) and patient-reported sleep in patients with supine-predominant obstructive sleep apnea. This study aims to assess the accuracy of patient perception of supine sleep. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study, assessing patient perception of total sleep and supine sleep, including duration. Data were analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics, bias-plot (Bland-Altman) analysis, and Spearman correlation (rs) to analyze relationships among continuous data. RESULTS: Total number of patients who underwent PSG was 518, with data from 368 of these patients analyzed. Most of these patients underwent diagnostic PSG (49.2%). Patients were excluded because of missing or incomplete data (n = 133) or immobility (n = 17). Some patients (n = 97, 26%) did not perceive supine sleep, with 34 (35% of those with unperceived supine sleep or 9% of whole group) of these having more than 60 minutes of PSG supine sleep (range 0-305.5 minutes). All "unsure" patients (n = 8, 2.2%) had significant supine sleep recorded (31.5-257.5 minutes). For the presence of any PSG supine sleep, questioning had a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity 72.7% with positive predictive value of 96.7% and negative predictive value of 24.5%. There was a significant correlation (rs = 0.63, P < .0001) between perceived and PSG supine sleep, but wide limits of agreement (-246.9 to 194.2 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing in-laboratory PSG, the perception of supine sleep predicts the presence of PSG supine sleep. However, questioning patients has a poor negative predictive value and patient estimates of supine sleep duration are inaccurate.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: For clinicians involved in investigating and treating sleep disorders, understanding the accuracy of patient recall of supine sleep would allow informed comparisons between polysomnography (PSG) and patient-reported sleep in patients with supine-predominant obstructive sleep apnea. This study aims to assess the accuracy of patient perception of supine sleep. METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study, assessing patient perception of total sleep and supine sleep, including duration. Data were analyzed utilizing descriptive statistics, bias-plot (Bland-Altman) analysis, and Spearman correlation (rs) to analyze relationships among continuous data. RESULTS: Total number of patients who underwent PSG was 518, with data from 368 of these patients analyzed. Most of these patients underwent diagnostic PSG (49.2%). Patients were excluded because of missing or incomplete data (n = 133) or immobility (n = 17). Some patients (n = 97, 26%) did not perceive supine sleep, with 34 (35% of those with unperceived supine sleep or 9% of whole group) of these having more than 60 minutes of PSG supine sleep (range 0-305.5 minutes). All "unsure" patients (n = 8, 2.2%) had significant supine sleep recorded (31.5-257.5 minutes). For the presence of any PSG supine sleep, questioning had a sensitivity of 77.9%, specificity 72.7% with positive predictive value of 96.7% and negative predictive value of 24.5%. There was a significant correlation (rs = 0.63, P < .0001) between perceived and PSG supine sleep, but wide limits of agreement (-246.9 to 194.2 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing in-laboratory PSG, the perception of supine sleep predicts the presence of PSG supine sleep. However, questioning patients has a poor negative predictive value and patient estimates of supine sleep duration are inaccurate.
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Kais Hamza; Scott Sands; Anthony Turton; Philip Berger; Garun Hamilton Journal: Respirology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: H Bearpark; L Elliott; R Grunstein; S Cullen; H Schneider; W Althaus; C Sullivan Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Danielle L Wilson; Alison M Fung; Gabrielle Pell; Hannah Skrzypek; Maree Barnes; Ghada Bourjeily; Susan P Walker; Mark E Howard Journal: Sleep Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Shaun W Yo; Simon A Joosten; Hari Wimaleswaran; Darren Mansfield; Luke Thomson; Shane A Landry; Bradley A Edwards; Garun S Hamilton Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 4.324
Authors: Robert M Silver; Shannon Hunter; Uma M Reddy; Francesca Facco; Karen J Gibbins; William A Grobman; Brian M Mercer; David M Haas; Hyagriv N Simhan; Samuel Parry; Ronald J Wapner; Judette Louis; Judith M Chung; Grace Pien; Frank P Schubert; George R Saade; Phyllis Zee; Susan Redline; Corette B Parker Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.661