Sarit Polsky1, Mengdi Wu2, Bruce W Bode3, Stephanie N DuBose2, Robin S Goland4, David M Maahs5, Nicole C Foster2, Anne L Peters6, Carol J Levy7, Viral N Shah1, Roy W Beck2. 1. 1 Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes , Aurora, Colorado. 2. 2 Jaeb Center for Health Research , Tampa, Florida. 3. 3 Atlanta Diabetes Centers , Atlanta, Georgia . 4. 4 Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center at Columbia University Medical Center , New York, New York. 5. 5 Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University , Stanford, California. 6. 6 Department of Internal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California. 7. 7 Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Bone Disease, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gestational tight glycemic control is critical for women with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Limited data exist on the adoption and retention of diabetes technologies among women in different parity strata. METHODS: We compared T1D management between T1D Exchange clinic registry participants (mean age 28 ± 9 years, 84% white non-Hispanic, and median T1D duration 13 years) who were pregnant at enrollment or year 1 follow-up ("recently pregnant" between 2010 and 2013, n = 214), ever (but not recently) pregnant (n = 1540), and never pregnant (n = 2586). We examined self-reported maternal and fetal outcomes in 130 women who delivered a baby within the last year. RESULTS: Recently pregnant women had the lowest hemoglobin A1c (6.5% pregnant vs. 7.8% ever pregnant vs. 8.0% never pregnant, P < 0.001). Recently pregnant women reported the highest use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (74% vs. 60% vs. 58%, adjusted P < 0.001) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) (36% vs.17% vs. 12%, adjusted P < 0.001) therapies compared with ever or never pregnant women, respectively, after adjusting for age, diabetes duration, and socioeconomic status. Among women 18-25 years old, CGM use was highest among recently pregnant women (adjusted P = 0.0022). Never pregnant women 26-45 years old had a higher use of CGM compared with younger counterparts (adjusted P < 0.001). Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were common. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high uptake levels of advanced diabetes technologies among pregnant women, rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes remain high. More studies are needed to determine how these technologies could be best used in pregnancy and postpartum to improve health outcomes among women with T1D.
BACKGROUND: Gestational tight glycemic control is critical for women with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Limited data exist on the adoption and retention of diabetes technologies among women in different parity strata. METHODS: We compared T1D management between T1D Exchange clinic registry participants (mean age 28 ± 9 years, 84% white non-Hispanic, and median T1D duration 13 years) who were pregnant at enrollment or year 1 follow-up ("recently pregnant" between 2010 and 2013, n = 214), ever (but not recently) pregnant (n = 1540), and never pregnant (n = 2586). We examined self-reported maternal and fetal outcomes in 130 women who delivered a baby within the last year. RESULTS: Recently pregnant women had the lowest hemoglobin A1c (6.5% pregnant vs. 7.8% ever pregnant vs. 8.0% never pregnant, P < 0.001). Recently pregnant women reported the highest use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (74% vs. 60% vs. 58%, adjusted P < 0.001) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) (36% vs.17% vs. 12%, adjusted P < 0.001) therapies compared with ever or never pregnant women, respectively, after adjusting for age, diabetes duration, and socioeconomic status. Among women 18-25 years old, CGM use was highest among recently pregnant women (adjusted P = 0.0022). Never pregnant women 26-45 years old had a higher use of CGM compared with younger counterparts (adjusted P < 0.001). Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were common. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high uptake levels of advanced diabetes technologies among pregnant women, rates of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes remain high. More studies are needed to determine how these technologies could be best used in pregnancy and postpartum to improve health outcomes among women with T1D.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diabetes management; Glycemic control; Pregnancy; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Ravinder Jeet Kaur; Byron H Smith; Basak Ozaslan; Jordan E Pinsker; Mari Charisse Trinidad; Grenye O'Malley; Donna Desjardins; Kristin N Castorino; Camilla Levister; Corey Reid; Shelly McCrady-Spitzer; Selassie J Ogyaadu; Mei Mei Church; Molly Piper; Walter K Kremers; Barak Rosenn; Francis J Doyle; Eyal Dassau; Carol J Levy; Yogish C Kudva Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 7.337
Authors: Grenye O'Malley; Barak Rosenn; Emily V Nosova; Yogish C Kudva; Sophia Scarpelli Shchur; Camilla Levister; Ravinder Kaur; Jordan E Pinsker; Kristin Castorino; Mei Mei Church; Eyal Dassau; Carol J Levy Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2021-07-03
Authors: Carol J Levy; Nicole C Foster; Stephanie N DuBose; Shivani Agarwal; Sarah K Lyons; Anne L Peters; Gabriel I Uwaifo; Linda A DiMeglio; Jennifer L Sherr; Sarit Polsky Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Gloria Lekšić; Maja Baretić; Marina Ivanišević; Dubravka Jurišić-Eržen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Grenye O'Malley; Basak Ozaslan; Carol J Levy; Kristin Castorino; Donna Desjardins; Camilla Levister; Shelly McCrady-Spitzer; Mei Mei Church; Ravinder Jeet Kaur; Corey Reid; Walter K Kremers; Francis J Doyle; Mari Charisse Trinidad; Barak Rosenn; Jordan E Pinsker; Yogish C Kudva; Eyal Dassau Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-08-17 Impact factor: 7.337