Literature DB >> 29990367

Robust and automatic motion-capture data recovery using soft skeleton constraints and model averaging.

Mickaël Tits1, Joëlle Tilmanne1, Thierry Dutoit1.   

Abstract

Motion capture allows accurate recording of human motion, with applications in many fields, including entertainment, medicine, sports science and human computer interaction. A common difficulty with this technology is the occurrence of missing data, due to occlusions, or recording conditions. Various models have been proposed to estimate missing data. Some are based on interpolation, low-rank properties or inter-correlations. Others involve dataset matching or skeleton constraints. While the latter have the advantage of promoting a realistic motion estimation, they require prior knowledge of skeleton constraints, or the availability of a prerecorded dataset. In this article, we propose a probabilistic averaging method of several recovery models (referred to as Probabilistic Model Averaging (PMA) in this paper), based on the likelihoods of the distances between body points. This method has the advantage of being automatic, while allowing an efficient gap data recovery. To support and validate the proposed method, we use a set of four individual recovery models, based on linear/nonlinear regression in local coordinate systems. Finally, we propose two heuristic algorithms to enforce skeleton constraints in the reconstructed motion, which can be used on any individual recovery model. For validation purposes, random gaps were introduced into motion-capture sequences, and the effects of factors such as the number of simultaneous gaps, gap length and sequence duration were analyzed. Results show that the proposed probabilistic averaging method yields better recovery than (i) each of the four individual models and (ii) two recent state-of-the-art models, regardless of gap length, sequence duration and number of simultaneous gaps. Moreover, both of our heuristic skeleton-constraint algorithms significantly improve the recovery for 7 out of 8 tested motion-capture sequences (p < 0.05), for 10 simultaneous gaps of 5 seconds. The code is available for free download at: https://github.com/numediart/MocapRecovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29990367      PMCID: PMC6039011          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Gaussian process dynamical models for human motion.

Authors:  Jack M Wang; David J Fleet; Aaron Hertzmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  A general regression neural network.

Authors:  D F Specht
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1991

3.  Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Pfister; Alexandre M West; Shaw Bronner; Jack Adam Noah
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2014-05-30

4.  Quantitative assessment of the accuracy for three interpolation techniques in kinematic analysis of human movement.

Authors:  Samuel J Howarth; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 5.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors.

Authors:  Lorenzo Chiari; Ugo Della Croce; Alberto Leardini; Aurelio Cappozzo
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  A novel approach to solve the "missing marker problem" in marker-based motion analysis that exploits the segment coordination patterns in multi-limb motion data.

Authors:  Peter Andreas Federolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications.

Authors:  Lars Mündermann; Stefano Corazza; Thomas P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture technologies through simultaneous data collection during gait: proof of concept.

Authors:  Elena Ceseracciu; Zimi Sawacha; Claudio Cobelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting Missing Marker Trajectories in Human Motion Data Using Marker Intercorrelations.

Authors:  Øyvind Gløersen; Peter Federolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Detection and Classification of Artifact Distortions in Optical Motion Capture Sequences.

Authors:  Przemysław Skurowski; Magdalena Pawlyta
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Flipping food during grilling tasks, a dataset of utensils kinematics and dynamics, food pose and subject gaze.

Authors:  Débora Pereira; Yuri De Pra; Emidio Tiberi; Vito Monaco; Paolo Dario; Gastone Ciuti
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Locally weighted PCA regression to recover missing markers in human motion data.

Authors:  Hai Dang Kieu; Hongchuan Yu; Zhuorong Li; Jian Jun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.